Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Education’ Category

Since my last post on 1/12/2013, I received numerous insights on what is being planned for the future. Just few days after my post, there was a symposium held in UM regarding this issue. One of the recommendation that was proposed was  for a common entry exam known as MMLE (Malaysian Medical Licensing Exam), similar to USMLE. The 1st Part of this exam can be sat when you are a student. As I had predicted long time ago, there will come a time where this will be inevitable. The government will not be able to provide job to everyone and thus some sort of screening test must be done. It is either a common entry exam or a common exit exam after housemanship. The only problem in Malaysia is transparency ! Being in Malaysia, we are so used to being influenced by political masters to artificially implement a quota system. What will happen to JPA scholars, MARA scholars and public university graduates? Will they be given priority or will they be in the same boat? Even though I support such a move to eradicate the poor quality students, transparency is always my concern. Who will conduct these exams and how will it be conducted remained to be seen.

When I was admitted to UM Medical Faculty in early 1990s, every single one of us will be given JPA scholarship. It is up to us whether we want to accept it or not. Over the last few years, the students were given an option whether to choose JPA scholarship or PTPTN loan. The latest news that I heard was that many students this year were not offered JPA scholarship at all. Many of those who applied were also rejected. This was across the board for all universities. Is this a prelude to the fact that jobs are not guaranteed in the future ? Being a JPA scholar means the government must provide a job for you as you will be bonded for 10 years. I was also informed that JPA has stopped giving overseas scholarship for medicine.

Many people do not realise the implication of oversupply of doctors. Many are just talking about quality which I had written many times. Introducing a common entry or exit exam will overcome the issue of quality (hopefully) but what will happen to the rest? Many would have spent almost RM 300-500K not knowing that they will become unemployed. Likely they will venture into selling products either pharmaceutical products or supplements. The public will be convinced with what they are selling as they are “doctors” on paper. It has already started. I know a few who had quit housemanship and working as “medical consultant” for companies selling supplements and health products. It is a business and capitalist world out there, where everyone wants to make money out of our society’s ignorance, similar to our many medical schools in this Bolehland.

And for those who completed housemanship but could not get a MO job in government service, they may end up opening GP clinics or venturing into complimentary medicine like Ozone therapy, chelation therapy, homeopathy etc etc. Unethical practices will become a norm and cheating public will be a daily affair in the name of survival. You can already see it happening when GPs are selling supplements, traditional medicines and venturing into aesthetic medicine, anti ageing etc etc. I know one GP who wanted to give growth hormone injection and hydrocortisone tablets to a 75 years old lady to make her “younger”!!

I spoke to one GP who is doing law. He told me that when he opened his clinic, it was the only clinic for surrounding 8 Tamans. Now, each Taman has about 3-4 clinics, fighting for the same pool of patients! Thus, he decided to do law and soon to become a medico-legal lawyer! A good move I must say as looking at the current situation, the number of medico-legal cases will definitely increase in coming years. As for the GPs, their income will gradually decline to the extend that they will end up closing shop or end up doing what I described above. Overall, it will be the public who will be at the loosing end………….

Well, I will be going on leave again from tomorrow till Next Thursday. So, I may not be able to answer any comments till I am back. The dengue epidemic has drained me enough over the last few months, Thus, for the first time, I will be taking my family not overseas, not to a land but “on the sea” ……………Welcome to Starcruise………………

Read Full Post »

It’s December 2013, time flies! By next month, this blog will be 4 years old. From the time I started this blog in January 2010, the number of views has increased tremendously. Currently, I receive almost 1500 views per day with sometimes reaching close to 4-5000 views/day.

Yesterday, I attended a function which was graced by many government doctors and top civil servants. It was also attended by our MMA president Dato Dr K Tharmaseelan. Interesting facts were revealed, which just made whatever I predicted all these years to become  a reality soon. Over the last few years, the government was trying to improve the income and working condition of the civil service doctors. The salary was increased with time based promotion and shift duty was introduced for housemanship from September 2011.  Whenever something like this is done without proper consultation, setbacks will occur.

The shift duty was introduced not only to reduce the working hours but also to reduce the number of housemen walking around in the ward at any one time. If not, close to 50 housemen will be in each department during office hours. When it was first mooted, I wrote about it over here. As I predicted then, it has happened. Quality of training has deteriorated and patient care has gone down the drain. Many just leave the ward the moment their shift duty finishes without completing their work and promises to the patients. They just don’t bother what happens to the patient till their next shift. They also do not know what is happening to the patients when they come back for their next shift! The situation has caused concerns among the top guys in MOH and thus effective this month, the total working hours for Housemen will be increased from 60 hours with 2 days off to 75 hours with 1 day off !! Will this change anything ? I don’t think so. A better option is to go back to the old system but give them off, based on the total number of hours they have worked. If they have completed the 75 hours for that week, then they should be given the next few days off . This is what practiced in Australia and you can’t run away from your responsibility.

Unemployment of future medical graduates has been written many times in this blog and recently our MMA president voiced it out openly in mainstream newspaper. Public universities have started to cut down their intakes as of this year but private universities have to maintain certain number of students to make profit. Starting from next year, there will ONLY be certain number of intakes into civil service every year. Currently, whenever an application is sent, immediately it is processed and job offer is given within 1-2 months. Starting from next year, the intake dates will be fixed to 2-3 times/year. Whether everyone who applies will get their posting is still a mystery but likely you may need to wait longer. Thus, if you finish your degree in January and the intake is only in July , you need to wait 6 months hoping that enough post is available for all the applicants.

There are also talks at MOH level on giving housemanship on contract basis. It is very likely the time will come for this as the number of post will be limited. The discussion is to offer housemanship on contract basis for 2 years, after which you need to reapply into civil service. How it will be decided on who will receive the job offer is still being determined. Likely an exam plus performance review by HOD will be used. If you do not get a job in civil service, you need to find your own job outside. It also means, you can forget about postgraduate training.

From next year, the 6th posing of housemanship will be done at primary care clinics. I had written about this over here. I do not want to elaborate any further.

The time based promotion has also caused a lot of unhappiness among the senior doctors. When it was introduced in 2010, I wrote this. Whatever I wrote in that article is now becoming a reality. Many senior consultants are still stuck at U54 grade when their previous housemen(who is now a senior MO or junior specialist) are also in the same grade with almost same salary. There is no incentive for any further progress. Thus, why bother doing anything new or challenging when you are going to be paid the same. If you are going to remain in civil service , why even bother doing subspecialty! No new perks or appreciation. Well, didn’t I say that in my article way back in 2010?

Well, enough said in this blog. I will stop here till further information arrives on my table. Sadly, the medical community in Johor lost another great consultant yesterday at a young age. A well-known  Consultant Ophthalmologist and a Head of Department who is from a very well-known family in Johor passed away yesterday after battling with a primary brain tumour. God bless him. RIP. Life is always short……………..

Read Full Post »

While in Malaysia we are talking about the entry qualifications to do medicine, a more interesting but rather sad incidences are happening in other parts of the world. I had talked about increasing litigation rate, declining income of doctors, doctors closing shops due to high maintenance cost and declining income etc etc, but in our neighbouring country as well as in UK, laws are being created to send doctors to jail!.

In Indonesia, there was a recent uproar by the O&G community when 3 gynaecologist were sent to jail for negligence. I do not know the real story behind this event except from what was reported over here and here.  Indonesian health system is still developing and due to their poor control of the medical education,poor accessibility of healthcare and a huge area to cover,the quality of products/healthcare is questionable. Singapore and Malaysia benefits a lot as the major contributor of medical tourism in Malaysia are Indonesians. I do see quite a number of them and they practically DO NOT trust their doctors! I don’t blame them as when I see the medications and the diagnosis made, it is worst than whatever I had seen over here. However, some of their top universities are better than ours. Nowadays I see more Indonesian academics presenting papers in international conferences than Malaysians, despite their poorer command of English. One day, they might overtake us, who knows?

IN the UK, the Prime Minister is drafting a law to send doctors/healthcare staffs who neglect patients, to prison! It’s interesting when a politician talks about neglecting people!!  The NHS itself need a lot of rectifications before you implement such a law. The GMC in UK is already an independent strict body in monitoring the practice of doctors.  In March 2012, I wrote THIS where the GMC had warned that doctors will face stern action for ignoring poor care. It basically says that if you are a doctor who notice a poor care is being provided to a patient by another doctor, it is your duty to report it. If not, you will also be penalised!

So, what’s happening in our Bolehland? The quality of products are deteriorating day by day as we speak. We are still fighting over entry requirement when it should have been decided long time ago. The education system has gone down the drain with countless number of people scoring straight As. The deteriorating quality of junior doctors are very obvious as I had mentioned and shown evidences many times before. Will the same situation and laws be implemented in Malaysia in the future? I was saying that Indonesians are coming to Malaysia as they do not trust their doctors. Will the same scenario happen to Malaysians very soon? I can already see it happening when many patients who came to see me, openly said that they do not trust the junior doctors in KKs and government hospitals (not to say that the private doctors can be trusted either!). And, these were patients who have been going to government clinics/hospitals for a long time. Thus, they can see the difference.

There was also an interesting news in Malaysia when MOH withdrew the admitting/inpatient license of a private hospital in Seremban. This is one of the oldest private hospital in Seremban which started as a maternity centre. Unfortunately, over the last few years, I heard that many of the resident consultants left due to internal problems. They were surviving on visiting consultants. Hope the MOH and MMC will take similar stern actions on under-performing, unethical, doctors and hospitals.

OB/GYN Strike Reaches Jakarta as Doctors Threaten National Walk Out

By Arientha Primanita & Ezra Sihite on 7:57 pm November 26, 2013.

Indonesia’s gynecologists continued to rally on Tuesday behind a pair of doctors jailed over the death of a patient, calling for a nationwide shutdown and protests in the capital over the alleged “criminalization” of medical professionals.

“It’s not a strike. It’s a solidarity action that we will take to stop the criminalization of doctors,” Nurdadi Saleh, the chairman of Indonesia Obstetrics and Gynecology Association (POGI), said on Tuesday. ”We are not fighting for doctors to be immune from the law, but the cause of the death was not negligence. It was due to a gas embolism.”

The Supreme Court agrees, in part, with Nurdadi’s statement. The mother, Julia Fransiska Makatey, did die of heart complications resulting from a gas embolism, but the panel of judges placed the blame in the hands of Dewa Ayu Sasiary Prawani and her peers. Three OB/GYNs, Ayu, Hendy Siagian and Hendry Simanjuntak, were found guilty of negligence over Julia’s death at Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Prof. Dr. R.D Kandou by the Supreme Court on Sept. 18, 2012.

The three doctors failed to receive the consent of Julia or her family before beginning a Cesarean section. Before the procedure, the doctors did not check the patient’s vital signs with an electrocardiogram (EKG), the court ruled. Julia died a short time later as a substantial amount of gas trapped in her vascular system reached her heart.

While it is normal for air to enter the circulatory system during surgery, it takes a sizable amount of gas — in excess of 100 ml — to stop the heart. Gas embolisms are a common risk for surgeries like Cesarean sections, but deaths resulting from embolisms following C-sections are rare in countries like Singapore where proper preventative measures have greatly reduced the risk.

Indonesia has made strides in recent years to reduce maternal mortality rates, but the nation still has one of the highest rates of death for pregnant mothers in Southeast Asia. According to data compiled by the World Bank, 220 mothers die for every 100,000 live births. Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Singapore and Myanmar all reported lower death rates.

Gas embolisms caused only 2 percent of those deaths region-wide, according to World Health Organization data tracking maternal deaths from 1997 to 2007. Hemorrhaging, or blood loss, resulted in 32 percent of maternal deaths in Southeast Asia during the same period.

Allegations of malpractice are common in Indonesia, but doctors’ so-called “conspiracy of silence,” has hindered efforts to prosecute negligent health care professionals. When Ayu, Hendry and Hendy were first brought up on malpractice charges, the three were declared innocent by a local court. The verdict was later overturned by the Supreme Court but by that point the doctors were already missing.

All were sentenced to 10 months in prison and were ordered to report to the jail to begin their sentences in early Nov. The Attorney General’s Office declared the doctors fugitives from justice after none of them reported to prison. Ayu was found working in Balikpapan on Nov 8 and detained. Her former colleague Hendry was detained a short time later.

Hendy is still at large.

The arrests sent shockwaves through the nation’s OB/GYN community. Gynecologists in North Sulawesi and Gorontalo walked out on a three-day strike last week over allegations of a witch hunt. The anger has now spread to the capital, where some 600 doctors plan to march on the Supreme Court on Wednesday. Gynecologists will wear a black armband and pins in solidarity with the three OB/GYNs, Nurdadi said.

“We have all been working nicely, but if we are still being stepped on how can we not shout with a protest,” he said.

The association is calling for the Supreme Court to revoke its decision and allow the doctors to walk free. The Indonesian Doctors Association (IDI) and POGI North Sulawesi have already filed for a judicial review. The case sets a dangerous precedent in Indonesia, IDI chairman Zaenal Abidin said.

“It could be bad jurisprudence as the doctors could be charged if the patients died or did not recover from illnesses,” Zaenal said. ”We will prove that the Supreme Court is wrong in implementing the law.”

The IDI itself admits that a gas embolism was found in Julia’s autopsy. But the POGI alleged that complications like gas embolisms are unpredictable and unpreventable. The patient was admitted to the emergency room and was only 26 years old, too young to necessitate a EKG reading before her surgery, Nurdadi said. She needed fast treatment to save the life of her child, which the OB/GYN staff successfully did, he said.

The doctors cannot be held liable for deaths that are out of their hands, Nurdadi said.

“How could something outside doctors’ capabilities be caused by negligence?,” he said.

The case received the backing of Indonesian Health Minister Nafsiah Mboi on Tuesday who said she supported the protest. The Ministry of Health will assemble a team to investigate the death, she said.

“The media and public must understand [the doctors’] feelings,” Nafsiah said. ”[What] if friends of yours were treated unfairly like this? Ayu was trying to help a pregnant woman and her unborn baby. She was in critical condition.

“The baby survived but the mother did not.”

David Cameron: Bad doctors and nurses will face jail

DOCTORS and nurses who “wilfully neglect” patients will face up to five years in prison, it was announced last night.

Published: Sat, November 16, 2013

Prime Minister David Cameron is promising tough actionPrime Minister David Cameron is promising tough action [REUTERS]
David Cameron said NHS workers who mistreated and abused patients would face “the full force of the law”, under the creation of the new criminal offence.The Prime Minister revealed one of the recommendations from a review of patient safety, set up following the Mid Staffs scandal.

Earlier this year, a public inquiry found poor care may have led to hundreds of needless patient deaths at Stafford Hospital.

A package of measures will be unveiled by Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt in Parliament on Tuesday.

Staff who mistreat and abuse patients will face punishment modelled on laws against the wilful neglect of adults under the Mental Capacity Act.

These include fines and prison sentences of up to five years.Mr Cameron said: “The NHS is full of brilliant doctors, nurses and other health workers who dedicate their lives to caring for our loved ones.

“But Mid-Staffordshire hospital showed that sometimes the standard of care is not good enough.

“That is why we have taken a number of different steps that will improve patient care and improve how we spot bad practice.

“Never again will we allow substandard care, cruelty or neglect to go unnoticed and unpunished.”

He added: “This is not about a hospital worker who makes a mistake, but specific cases where a patient has been neglected or ill-treated.

“This offence will make clear that neglect is unacceptable and those who do so will feel the full force of the law.”

Health chiefs urged the Government to make sure the new offence is accompanied by legally enforceable staffing levels on hospital wards, especially in the case of elderly care.

Dr Peter Carter, chief executive of the Royal College of Nursing, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “This on its own will not be a remedy, it will not be a panacea to cure the perceived ills of the NHS.

“What you need to do is to ensure that you have legally enforceable staffing levels so that you don’t end up with the situation that we are finding increasingly with the care of the older people.”

The Government is acting on the recommendations of a report into the Mid Staffs scandal [EPA]

“Never again will we allow substandard care, cruelty or neglect to go unnoticed and unpunished”

David Cameron

NHS campaigners also want the new charges to include hospital managers who suppress or ignore whistleblowers.”This alone will not avoid another Mid Staffs,” said Julie Bailey, who set up the Cure the NHS group which campaigned for a public inquiry into Mid Staffs.

“When staff try and reach out and inform managers there is a problem on those wards, staff need to be listened to.

“And if they are not listened to by the managers, that’s when we need that criminal offence.

“It may be extreme, but it will save lives.”

But, the chair of the Royal College of GPs, Dr Maureen Baker, said proper, effective systems were more important than the introduction of new criminal charges.

“Doctors, nurses – we are human, human beings make mistakes. You can’t change the human condition, but you can help support the humans in having systems around them that help keep them safe, caring and compassionate,” she said.

“You can’t rely on the law to properly regulate how people do their jobs. We need to rely on the professionalism of doctors, nurses, managers.

“What we need to do is let the professionalism take more centrality so that people can flag up the way they need to work in a safe system to care for patients properly.”

Health Ministry shuts down Chinese Maternity Hospital

NOVEMBER 22, 2013

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 22 — The Health Ministry has issued an order to the N.S. Chinese Maternity Hospital and Medical Centre (NSCMH) to suspend its in-patient services with immediate effect.

Health director-general Datuk Dr Noor Hisham Abdullah said this was because the hospital was found to have committed 10 violations of the Private Healthcare Facilities and Services Act 1998.

“These violations encompass matters involving both in-patient and out-patient services. One such example is that NSCMH lacks full-time resident doctors in certain core disciplines, thus raising concerns about patient safety,” he said in a statement, here.

The statement dated yesterday was faxed to Bernama, here, today.

Dr Noor Hisham said the hospital was now not allowed to admit new patients and the existing in-patients were to be transferred to other hospitals as patient safety and quality of healthcare were of paramount importance to the ministry.

He said the suspension order followed a thorough investigation into a complaint received by the ministry in August and was substantiated by findings obtained during a verification visit to the hospital on Sept 4.

“The ministry had twice issued show-cause letters on Sept 18 and Oct 21 respectively, asking for the hospital to provide detailed response regarding the remedial actions that had been taken and those that were being planned in order to overcome these 10 violations.”

He said a special meeting was convened on Oct 17 with the hospital’s representatives and NSCMH life members, seeking detailed explanation for the 10 violations noted during the verification visit and also to discuss possible solutions to the problems faced by the hospital.

“The hospital’s management was given 14 working days to respond to the second show-cause letter dated Oct 21 and that period lapsed on Nov 8.

“Hence, due to the failure of the hospital’s management to adequately address and overcome these 10 violations, the ministry was left with no other option but to issue a notice of immediate suspension of in-patient services at the hospital in order to ensure safe medical practices and to protect the interest of the patients,” he said. — Bernama

– See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/health-ministry-shuts-down-chinese-maternity-hospital#sthash.sjdkWGbM.dpuf

Read Full Post »

Since my last article on 10/11/2013, I read quite a number of letters in the newspaper regarding the issue of oversupply of doctors in Malaysia and the deteriorating quality of graduates.  There were 2 letters over here and here which was written by lay persons who were deeply concerned about our “doctor’s mill” and “obsession in doing medicine”. Something that I have been screaming about since the last 4 years or longer!

What interest me most was the statement from Datuk Dr Jayaindran who is the Head of Department of Medicine in HKL and a Deputy DG. Even though he decline to admit directly that there will be surplus of doctors, if you read in-between the lines, it is very clear that we are heading in that direction. He admits that the local medical schools are producing about 4000 graduates a year with another 1-2000 returning from overseas (remember, close to 50% of the medical schools in Malaysia have not produced graduates yet). However, he goes on to say that we have about 10 000 posts available? I got no idea from where he got this figure but even if it is true, based on his own calculation of graduates, it should be filled in less than 2 years! He also admits that there will come a time where the job will not be automatic and the graduates will have go through the necessary process and wait in line………….

It is also interesting to note that not only we have the highest number of medical schools per capita population in the world, we have now the best housemen: patient ratio in the world. We have conveniently beaten UK with 800 years of medical education with a ratio of 1: 3 compared to 1: 12 in the UK. Welcome to the true BOLEHLAND!! And now, the MOH will be discussing with MOE to increase the minimum entry qualifications !! So, are we admitting officially that our entry qualifications are low and any tom, dick and harry are becoming doctors? Are we admitting that the quality of students who are doing medicine is low ? No wonder the outputs are generally of low quality as well!

Finally, the madness is now hitting the sky. MOH is coming up with a brilliant plan of sending housemen to polyclinics and district hospitals for “training”, in line with the changing needs of our healthcare system and disease pattern!! Why can’t they just admit that they are running out of post/jobs! Again, we will be the first in the world! Today, our great Health Minister, who is a doctor by training has declared that housemanship training will soon be conducted at polyclinics, likely as early as next year ! As far as I am concerned, this is the most stupidest idea I have ever heard. Housemanship training is not about seeing primary care patients. This is done after completing ward-based horsemanship training. Of course, being a Miniter , he has to toe the line……….. Remember, our PM’s advise to Wathyamoorthy!

Despite admitting that the quality of graduates are going downhill, they seem to be introducing more and more programs which are going to make it worst. Let me tell you an example which I just saw few days ago. An 82 year old lady who is known to have Diabetes and renal impairment came to see me with lethargy, poor oral intake and feeling unwell. She is under a Klinik Kesihatan follow-up with the following medications:

1) Metformin 1g bd

2) Frusemide 40mg od

3) Hydrochlorothiazide 50mg od

4) Spironolactone 25mg od (just added 2 weeks ago for high BP !!)

5) Aspirin 100mg od

I think this is a good MCQ question. What do you think would have happened to this patient ? Obviously, this 82 year old lady is dehydrated with a Creatinine of 330 and Potassium of 6.2 mmol/L !! And this is a doctor who has completed 2 years of housemanship. An 82 year old lady with renal impairment taking all these medications which are contraindicated in renal impairment? I have said many times that doctors can be life savers as well as killers, with a license to kill! The situation is only going to get worst! They can’t even supervise their own MOs but want HOs to undergo training in KKs!  God bless this country……………..

The madness indeed has hit the sky……………..

Ministry reviewing entry qualifications

THE Health Ministry is looking into the possibility of increasing the minimum entry qualifications into medical colleges in a move to improve the standard of healthcare in the country and the competency of doctors.

The ministry, together with the Ministry of Education, has embarked on a study to review the existing entry requirements.

According to the Malaysian Medical Council website, the minimum entry requirement into medical school currently is five Bs at SPM level in biology, physics, chemistry, mathematics or additional mathematics and another subject.

“We’re investigating whether the minimum qualification needs to be re-looked. Nursing colleges started with three credits which was later increased to five.

“Similarly, we are looking at this possible scenario for those applying to medical colleges,” said the ministry’s deputy director-general of health (medical) Datuk Dr Jeyaindran Sinnadurai.

On claims that many junior doctors are not as competent or passionate about their job because of insufficient training, he admitted this was partly true.

“We have had several meetings to address the training of house officers (HOs). For example, their training used to run for 12 months, but now it has been extended to 24 months.”

He said this was because those trained overseas did not have similar exposure to patients, as local graduates did. Hence, it was necessary for them to relearn various aspects of all the six mandatory disciplines in medicine.

“Many are very stressed out because they have not been exposed to this type of clinical practice in their medical schools and it comes as a culture shock.”

He also said the flexi-system introduced some time ago for house officers had some limitations in that it did not give the HOs ownership and accountability for their patients.

“To overcome this we have made several modifications and are confident that it will address these areas of concern.

“With our proposed new system, we’re certain that HOs will have adequate supervision to ensure they take ownership of their patient and be accountable for their management. This will result in them working 65 to 75 hours a week, which we think is acceptable,” he added.

To ensure adequate exposure to clinical procedures and other ward-based work, the ministry is working on implementing a one HO to four patients ratio.

Dr Jeyaindran said that when he was a HO in the early 1980s, it used to be a 1:20 patients ratio. While the original ministry quota was 1:14, today it’s 1:3 patients. Other countries, such as Singapore have a ratio of 1:8 while in the United Kingdom it is 1:12.

“Still, some HOs are complaining about too much work and too many hours. It was recently brought up that HOs shouldn’t work more than 60 hours a week.

“However, they should consider their housemanship as a period of training, not focusing on how many hours they worked but the amount of experience that was gained.”

He said of the 144 government hospitals, 48 are designated as training hospitals for HOs, with close to 35,000 beds.

The ministry is hoping to open two more training hospitals soon.

“Over and above this, as non-communicable diseases (NCD) are beginning to be a burden to the healthcare system, we’re looking at HOs to be trained at primary care clinics (klinik kesihatan) under the supervision of family physicians.

“This pilot project will start early next year. We need to realign the training of our future doctors based on changing needs of the nation and evolving disease patterns.”

Dr Jeyaindran, however, does not foresee medical graduates becoming jobless in the near future, despite the fears expressed by the MMA.

“Admittedly there will come a time when they will have to wait a while to find suitable training posts. They will not get a vacancy straight away. They’ll have to apply and wait their turn. It’s a worldwide phenomenon.

“It’s not a minibus, you can’t shove in as many people at one time as you like. And, when a graduate applies to the government, he or she has to go through the process; it’s not about not having enough posts.”

He said the ministry was also studying the current status of medical colleges, particularly the number of students admitted per year.

“There are close to 360 medical colleges all over the world. Locally, we are producing about 4,000 medical graduates annually.

“This does not include the 2,000 to 3,000 who come back every year. But we don’t really know the numbers because many are privately funded, mostly by their parents.

“The study has already been mooted and the outcome will be out next year.”

On accusations that there aren’t sufficient postings for HOs, Dr Jeyaindran said there was enough capacity.

“We have 9,500 medical postings and 10,000 available medical posts, so there is capacity.

“When we re-look the numbers, 9,000 might be the optimal figure but we are changing gradually, it must be a progressive move.

“How fast we do it will depend on the outcome of the two studies.

“The data will help us make rational decisions. We have to ask ourselves what is a safe number to attain in delivering safe healthcare; it’s a numbers game.

“We are getting there but it may take a longer time.”

He added that as of now, there were no plans to reduce the duration of HO training.

“We are still maintaining the need for HOs to undergo two years of housemanship and two years of compulsory service.

“If you come from an unrecognised college, you must sit for a compulsory exam. Unfortunately, it was decided that this medical qualifying exam can be taken almost anywhere.

“Before, it was only available in Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Universiti Malaya (UM) and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM).

“MMC strongly feels that the standard should be the same.

“Although we have many local colleges, the final assessment is very different from university to university.

“Building two, three or four more hospitals is not the solution, and MMA’s suggestion to have training hospitals for medical colleges is not the answer either.

“We must have specialists of sufficient seniority; we want to get it right the first time and not make hasty decisions.”

Read more: Ministry reviewing entry qualifications – General – New Straits Times http://www.nst.com.my/nation/general/ministry-reviewing-entry-qualifications-1.396547#ixzz2kuMUDh1O

More Training Centres Needed To House Newly Graduated Doctors – Dr Subramaniam

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 16 (Bernama) — The Health Ministry hopes to create more opportunities for newly graduated doctors to undergo housemanship due to an increase in the number of doctors graduating every year, said Datuk Seri Dr S. Subramaniam.Subramaniam said the number of graduates (doctors) has increased from 2,267 in 2008 to 3,655 in 2012 but the number of centres where they can be trained is only 42 hospitals throughout the country.“The ministry is therefore considering to place new doctors at polyclinics and hospitals in districts so that they can gain experience, exposure and acquire the necessary skills and the communication capabilities in medical services for two years,” he said after opening a seminar on “Housemanship Training in Malaysia” here, Saturday.

Also present was Malaysia Medical Association (MMA) President Datuk Dr N.K.S Tharmaseelan.

Subramaniam said new doctors may also undergo their housemanship at hospitals under the Defence Ministry.

— BERNAMA

Read Full Post »

Today, many of us would have read the 2 depressing news from the mainstream media. The first was brought to the attention of the public via this blog almost 4 years ago. In fact, I started to write about this issue way back in 2006 in MMA magazine. The MMA president then did not quite agree with me and told me that I am exaggerating. The current MMA president seem to be more vocal and has brought up the issue of “oversupply” of doctors in various mainstream media over the last few months. Somehow, the DG and Minister of Health denies that such a thing will happen at least for another 2-3 years. However, they never denied the fact that we will achieve the ratio of 1: 600 by 2016 and 1: 400 by 2020. With close to 36 medical schools and more than 40 medical programs, it will be sooner than later. The quality of products are becoming atrocious at times. Over the last 2 weeks, I have had at least 4 queries by “medical students” on postgraduate education. These are students in their 4th/5th year of medical educations and yet do not know anything about postgraduate education in medicine. All of them felt that doing Master’s and PhD is like going for another full-time course in a university. I give up!

Another depressing news was about a 3rd year medical students who committed suicide. Based on the newspaper report, the likely cause could be depression as he did not want to continue with his medical education. However, his parents insisted (even though they claim that they had agreed for him to change course, recently!) I will say this again: parents should never force their children to do medicine! Most of the housemen who end up with the psychiatric department belong to this group.

Finally, I received an interesting email from a Malaysian who is currently in Canada. She is a product of IMU twinning program in early 2000. She has given me permission to publish her email over here, in this blog. It looks like the situation in Canada is not better either. Furthermore, she has also commented on the deteriorating quality of medical students who are undergoing twinning program in Canada which has led to some universities closing their twinning arrangements with IMU.

“From as far back as 2004, when I first transferred to Dalhousie University, there were rumblings that Canadian partner medical schools were considering withdrawing from IMU’s arrangement because of the quality of students they were receiving. In fact, the year I graduated, the 4 students from IMU (including myself) became the first cohort of students in the history of the partnership to complete the program without failing out or repeating. To my surprise, when I arrived at Memorial University of Newfoundland for my postgraduate training, I found that this was indeed a bit of a trend across all the partner universities. To wit:
 
I met Malaysian graduates of University of Western Ontario who confirmed that UWO was no longer keen on taking Malaysian IMU students.
Same for University of Calgary (though UoC was a little less vehement, because their 3yr program gave zero credit for the 2.5yrs spent at IMU meaning all transfers started in 1st year there)
Dalhousie, year after year, keeps saying they are withdrawing (I suspect the CAD$35,000/yr tuition fee they charged was too lucrative however, to follow through for a long time… )
Memorial, this year, has announced that they are no longer accepting IMU students.
 
Much of the problems stemmed from the fact that the students from Malaysia arrived ill-equipped to handle the rigors of clerkship. In the Canadian system, the 3rd year of medical school can best be compared to the housemanship year – 100hr work weeks (back then, though this is now capped at 80hrs) combined with having to study and sit exams was not exactly an “ease-into-the-system” welcome. At Dalhousie, the “ease-in” consisted of a 12-week “bridging program” in which a crash course on psychiatry and pediatrics was provided (because, back in those days, IMU taught zip on these two subjects). Following that, you were thrown into 3rd year and left to “sink or swim”. Many sank.
 
I am now on faculty at Memorial University and it has been interesting to note that the failure rate of Malaysian medical students transferring out to Canada – at least at Memorial – has been increasing. I am not sure why, since I do not keep abreast of developments in IMU’s curriculum. Suffice to say that, after 7yrs of rumblings in the system, Memorial has now withdrawn from the partnership. Your blog seems to suggest that there is something alarming happening in the system in Malaysia, and I wonder if that has anything to do with it, though I would have imagined that IMU, being older than many of the other private institutions now peppering the landscape of medical education in Malaysia, would be able to retain its faculty quality?
 
I consider myself extremely fortunate that I navigated the minefield of medical education in Malaysia and landed where I am. Malaysians arriving in Canada for medical school (via IMU or other arrangements) face a rather tricky problem: there are no postgraduate opportunities for non-citizens and non-PRs, which means that you end up with a Canadian degree and have to either go back to Malaysia or compete for a spot in the US. The only other option is to pursue postgraduate training in less-popular sites that are willing to overlook your citizenship status in favour of the Canadian qualification (because the qualification is often preferable to a Canadian citizen with a foreign degree).
 
The biggest draw for Malaysian medical students to come to Canada is the fact that IMU’s program was an incredible backdoor to a Canadian medical degree that bypassed the 3yr undergrad requirement. As such, those that do succeed end up being the youngest grads – when I graduated from Dal, I was younger than the youngest 1st year med student, and as such I got a headstart on my colleagues on the road to becoming an attending (I believe it is termed consultant in Malaysia).  It was an incredible opportunity but that door appears to have closed at the majority of the Canadian universities that once partnered with IMU.
 
None of the Malaysian grads I knew, who went to Canadian universities, ended up returning to Malaysia. Given what I have read, I doubt I will return to Malaysia to practice, either. In any case, there is no opportunity there in the field of emergency medicine. Certainly, financially it would be rather disastrous to return. Average physician income in Canada is well over CAD$250,000 – rheumatologists, for example, had an average gross income of CAD$360,000. (Granted, taxes in Canada are much higher…but not that much higher!) Your blog highlighting the pay issues in Malaysia for young physicians is truly a reality check for those that go into the field expecting riches. Even in Canada, this is true – the average length of training for a physician is 3yrs for an undergraduate degree, 4yrs medical school followed by a minimum of 2yrs (family medicine) to 6yrs (certain surgical specialties e.g. neurosurgery) for the postgrad qualification. Following which one may pursue an additional 1-3yrs of subspecialty qualification (e.g. rheumatology would take 3+4+3+2yrs to finish from the point of entry into university after A Levels). As you have pointed out, during those years, even in Canada the pay is worse than working at McDonald’s when calculated out on a per-hour basis. 
 
In any case, thank you for a most interesting read. I feel sad that this is the state of affairs in Malaysia – I had hoped when I left that, with time, the country would achieve progress but alas, it appears that is not so.

p.s :I forgot to mention – the average graduating medical student in Canada finishes with about CAD$100,000 – CAD$160,000 of debt. This debt collects interest while they toil at their postgraduate studies. So when they finish at last and are making that “average $250,000 salary”, they are usually far behind their peers who have gone on to establish themselves in, say, accountancy or engineering or other such fields. They “lose” those years of saving and asset accumulation AND have debt that they have to pay down. In other words, the physician begins his actual career (as a fully-fledged specialist) with a negative net worth of six figures….”

Read Full Post »

There are a lot of information about medical education in this blog. As long as there is a demand, businessman will take every opportunity to make money out of our society’s ignorance. I had always opposed the idea of privatisation of medical education. It should never be privatised. Many countries which privatised medical education eventually landed up producing sub par graduates. Businessman will only think about money and would not be bothered about the quality of medical educations. It use to take years to build a medical school but in this “bolehland”, we can start a shop-lot medical school within months! UM which started in 1964, were taking only 180 students by 1992 but we have less than 5 years old medical school taking 200 students ! We are truly a Bolehland!

I came across this interesting article published in New England Journal of Medicine  on 30/10/2013: Are We in a Medical Education Burble Market? . Despite the high medical education cost in US, the income of doctors has been sluggish since the early 2000s. Can the medical schools go on charging high fee when many doctors are finding it difficult to survive in US as I had written before? Many struggle to come out of debt even after years of working and training. The increasing litigation rate has not made their lives any easier. The article is a good read and likely the same situation will happen in Malaysia very soon. When the oversupply hits the country and when many doctors find it difficult to make money and cover their debt, only then people will realise that there is NO money in medicine. Eventually, they will stop sending their children to do medicine and the fee will gradually drop. The bubble will  burst ! In fact, it has already started with many medical schools finding it difficult to get students.

Another interesting article, from the US as well, was about a physician who left her medical practise. The topic was ” Why I left Medicine: A Burnt out Doctor’s decision to quit”. I use to say that there are 2 groups of  doctors out there. One is a group with pure passion in medicine and want to do the best for every patient. Another, is a group which treats medicine like any other job. They just want to come to work on time and leave on time. They don’t care less of what happens to the patients the moment they leave the hospital/clinic. Unfortunately, the dedicated and passionate group of doctors are the one who will get burnt out! That’s the reality. These doctors will spend most of their time in the hospital trying to make sure their patients are doing well and they even think about their patients while they are at home. These will create havoc in their family life and eventually lead to divorce, mental illness and even suicidal tendencies.

At the end of the day, many will realise that it is just another job to make a living. No matter what passion that you have, it will eventually boil down to your family and life. At one point I did almost give up medicine when I had huge debt to settle, a family with 2 kids to feed and without even an own house and furnitures. At that point, passion will be secondary. What matters most will be on how you want to bring up your family without debt. That’s the reason I keep saying that you should not take huge loans to do medicine. It will take a lifetime to settle the debt with car and house loan coming along the way. Unfortunately, many feel that they are going to make tonnes of money after graduating, and that clouds their mind.

Please read the articles below.

HAPPY DEEPAVALI TO EVERYONE…………………..

Why I Left Medicine: A Burnt-Out Doctor’s Decision To Quit

By Diane Shannon
Guest Contributor

When I introduce myself as a physician who left clinical practice, non-physicians ask me why I left. They’re generally intrigued that someone who sacrificed many years and many dollars for medical training would then change her mind. But physicians, almost universally, never ask me why I left. Instead, they ask me how. They call and email me with logistical questions, wanting to learn the secret of how I managed the transition out of clinical medicine (read “escape”).

Earlier this month I attended a conference on physician well-being at the Massachusetts Medical Society where I heard an alarming statistic: the suicide rate among women physicians is more than two times that of women in the general population.

It may be dramatic and self-serving to frame my career change as a way to avoid suicide, but I can attest that medicine was not conducive to my health. As an internist, working in adult outpatient clinics around Boston, I had trouble leaving my work at work. I’d go for a run and spend the entire 30 minutes wondering if I’d ordered the right diagnostic test. I suffered from chronic early morning wakening, even on my weekends off. I startled easily. I found it impossible to relax. I worried constantly that I’d make a mistake, like ordering the wrong dosage of a medication, or that a system flaw, like an abnormal lab report getting overlooked, would harm a patient. I no longer remembered the joy I’d felt when I first began medical school, and I couldn’t imagine surviving life as a doctor.

I no longer believe it was weakness or selfishness that led me to abandon clinical practice. I believe it was self-preservation. I knew I didn’t have the stamina and single-mindedness to try to provide high-quality, compassionate care within the existing environment. Perhaps, due to temperament or timing, I was less immune than others to the stresses of practicing medicine in a health care system that often seemed blind to humanness, both mine and my patients’.

That’s not to say that I don’t miss practicing medicine. I do. I miss engaging in meaningful interactions and being of service, reassuring an elderly woman that we could make her emphysema easier to endure, bearing witness to a cancer patient’s grace in the face of death, supporting a college student facing an unexpected pregnancy. I miss spending my days in deeply meaningful work. But given my choices at the time, I have no regrets.

I recently interviewed Mark Linzer, M.D., who researches physician burnout, and learned that the underlying causes are fairly predictable. Linzer and his research team found that four factors are associated with higher rates of burnout: time pressure, degree of control regarding work, work pace and level of chaos, and values alignment between the physician and administration. I experienced all four, but I think the greatest source of stress for me was the high level of chaos. I didn’t trust that patients would consistently receive the care they needed. Orders were sometimes incorrect, illegible (in the days before electronic medical records), or overlooked once written. An intravenous catheter left in too long led to widespread infection. Care providers forgot to wash their hands and spread serious infections from one patient to the next. EKGs and x-rays were misread. I’m someone who tends to imagine the worst. In the maelstrom of a chaotic work environment, I was worn down by worry.

Tactics to prevent medical errors have advanced since I practiced medicine. Checklists now remind care providers to replace intravenous catheters. Hand sanitizing gels and handwashing reminders are commonplace in hospitals and clinics now. Electronic ordering systems prevent handwriting errors and signal care providers about drug interactions and duplicate orders. It’s possible that with these improvements my greatest source of stress is now less of an issue, but physician burnout remains a widespread problem.

A 2012 study found that almost half of the practicing physicians surveyed had one or more symptoms of burnout. An online poll in the same year of more than 24,000 physicians found that only 54 percent would choose medicine again as a career, compared with 69 percent in 2011. From personal experience, I know the importance of creating a system in which physicians can fulfill their potential and connect with patients. I believe that until we see physicians as humans, prioritize their well-being, and create systems in which they can provide safe and compassionate care, we cannot expect them to heal others.

Hospital leaders are beginning to understand this equation. At the MMS conference, a panel of hospital executives spoke about the additional pressures on physicians within the current economic climate. I found it encouraging that the hospital leaders saw physician burnout as a serious problem and that many of the changes they were using to combat burnout were relatively simple. At one medical center, leaders attend patient rounds on a regular basis to better understand the physicians’ experience at the frontlines of care. They hold retreats to listen to physician complaints—then follow up on identified issues. Another leader sends thank you notes to physicians each time the hospital receives a complimentary letter from a patient. At another hospital, leaders decided to allow physicians to have more say about their daily schedule at the outpatient clinics. These were not costly interventions, and according to the executives, they seem to be helping.

Some of the solutions to physician burnout may be relatively simple and inexpensive — administration taking the time to understand physicians’ work experience and the barriers they encounter daily. Others are complex and resource-intensive, such as revamping the reimbursement system to measure and reward high quality compassionate care rather than the volume of procedures, tests, and physician visits.

Whether simple or complex, none of the solutions will be easy to execute, especially in the midst of the seismic changes taken place with health reform. But I believe that it’s possible to create a health system that supports physicians in their quest to provide high-quality, safe, compassionate care. I don’t think we can fix the U.S. health care system by expecting superhuman performance from humans under super-sized stress. We will only succeed if we instill safety and compassion for patients and providers in every aspect of care. If I suppress my humanness to survive in an environment that requires such a sacrifice, how will I be able to see yours?

Many groups across the nation are working on ways to infuse more humanity into health care. One example, the Schwartz Center for Compassionate Healthcare, founded by a health care attorney diagnosed with advanced lung cancer at age 40, helps health care organizations set up meetings where care providers can speak openly about the feelings of distress triggered by their daily work. If I’d had a safe place like “Schwartz Center Rounds” to express my emotions — fear, overwhelm, anger, guilt –perhaps I would have developed the resilience I needed to continue practicing medicine.

Given that I recently celebrated my fiftieth birthday and am happily ensconced in a writing career, it is unlikely that I will return to clinical practice. Sometimes this realization saddens me, but I no longer feel that leaving was weak or selfish.

Instead I believe that because I’ve survived in the trenches and now have a bit of perspective, I can help advocate for changes that will allow other physicians to practice medicine in a way that is life-giving to themselves and the patients they are privileged to serve — the way I had hoped to practice when I first donned my white coat.

Diane W. Shannon, M.D., MPH, is a freelance writer who focuses on performance improvement in health care. She lives in Chestnut Hill.

Are We in a Medical Education Bubble Market?

David A. Asch, M.D., M.B.A., Sean Nicholson, Ph.D., and Marko Vujicic, Ph.D.

October 30, 2013DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1310778

In November 1636, the prices of tulip bulbs in the Dutch market rose rapidly from their normal level to the point where a single bulb might sell for 10 times the annual earnings of a typical worker. Just as quickly, in May 1637, tulip-bulb prices returned to their previous values. The causes of this dramatic rise and fall remain in dispute. The event occurred during the Dutch Golden Age, when stock exchanges, central banking, and many of the fundamental structures that govern contemporary capital markets and the approaches deployed by MBAs today were developed.One modern economic analysis suggests that the precipitous decline in tulip-bulb prices resulted from a February 1637 change in the way that futures contracts were enforced, which immediately reduced the value of those contracts by 97%,1 but this analysis doesn’t explain why the prices had shot up in the first place. Clearly, tulipmania was a bubble market fueled by speculation rather than intrinsic valuation. After all, why would people be willing to pay 10 times the average annual wage for a single tulip bulb unless they were confident that they could sell it to an even greater fool willing to pay even more?

Bubble markets are created when an asset trades for increasingly higher prices as it is bought by people who are hopeful about its future value and then sold to others with even more optimistic views of that value. Recent examples include the U.S. housing bubble, in which home prices rapidly rose until 2007 and then just as rapidly fell, and the dot-com bubble, in which prices of Internet stocks rose until 2000 and then plummeted. Bubbles burst when some new sense of lower intrinsic value appears. The last buyers are stuck with something they paid too much for and can no longer unload. It’s like being caught without a chair when the music stops, but whereas even the losers at musical chairs knew that at some point someone would be left standing, bubble markets are usually recognized only in retrospect — the losers never saw it coming.

Are we in a bubble market in medical education? In medicine, students buy their education from medical schools and residency programs (which pay wages that are lower than the value of the work that residents provide in return). This education is transformed into skills and credentials that are then sold to patients in the form of services. So long as it is believed that patients, or whoever purchases health care on their behalf, will keep paying more and more for physicians’ services, students and trainees should be willing to pay more and more for the education that enables them to sell those services.

A simple measure of this market economy is the ratio of the average debt of a graduating student to the average annual income in the profession on entry into the workforce. There are more precise ways to measure the return on investment in medical education — for example, the net present value of the stream of cash flows out (for education) and in (for services). But that value isn’t very intuitive for most prospective students. In contrast, debt-to-income ratios reflect what students must borrow rather than what they must pay and, given whatever other assets they may have, how much in the hole they have to go. Thus, these ratios may better reflect how students actually feel about buying education.

Figure    1FIGURE 1Ratio

of Debt to Income, According to Medical Specialty. shows these ratios for selected medical specialties over the past 15 years and reveals that the ratio has become less favorable for students overall but particularly unfavorable for students entering family medicine or psychiatry. Although the cost of becoming a doctor is roughly the same whether you go into pediatrics or orthopedics, you earn much more in orthopedics.

The graph is instructive in another way: the debt-to-income ratio reveals the connection between what physicians can charge patients and what schools can charge students. Just as tulip bulbs can be sold at high prices only to people who think they can resell them at still higher prices, schools can sustain their high tuitions only if students can be convinced of higher returns in the form of payments from future patients. So, the amount that schools are able to charge students is inextricably linked to how much we pay doctors now and how much we plan to pay them in the future. Medical students can take on enormous debt only because the costs of that debt can be easily passed along to others down the road.

So are we in a medical education bubble? We would realize we have been in one if a sudden collapse in what patients are willing to pay doctors made it impossible to sell medical education at current prices, causing applications to fall and some medical schools to cut tuition to continue to attract qualified applicants. Figure 1 might be seen as suggesting that we are approaching such a collapse in primary care fields and psychiatry. But that is not likely to be the case. First, at least at the level of undergraduate medical education, schools charge a single price to students whether they go into family medicine or orthopedics. Although it isn’t necessarily clear to students or schools which students will choose what fields, the income of the average doctor can sustain the debt of the average doctor even as the differences among specialties create pressures for primary care and psychiatry.

Second, as high as the debt-to-income ratios may be for primary care and psychiatry, they are even higher for some other fields — notably, veterinary medicine, optometry, pharmacy, and dentistry, as shown in Figure 2FIGURE 2Ratio of Debt to Income, According to Occupation.. For veterinarians, incomes have risen slowly even as student debt has exploded.2 Yet although such company may ease the misery of primary care physicians, it does nothing to solve the underlying problem.

The problem is this: if we aim to reduce the costs of health care, we need to reduce the costs of medical education. We don’t have to believe that the high cost of medical education is what causes increases in health care costs in order to develop this sense of urgency. We just have to recognize that the high costs of medical education are sustainable only if we keep paying doctors a lot of money, and there are strong signs that we can’t or won’t. Only about 20% of health care costs are attributable to physician payments, and many of the current efforts to reduce costs are aimed elsewhere, such as hospital payments, and have only indirect effects on physicians’ earnings. But physicians’ and dentists’ earnings have been sluggish since the early 2000s.3,4 Even if prospects for physicians’ income fall fast, a burst bubble can be averted if schools see it coming before their students do and lower their prices.

The general lesson is that if we want to keep health care costs down and still have access to well-qualified physicians, we also need to keep the cost of creating those physicians down by changing the way that physicians are trained. From college through licensure and credentialing, our annual physician-production costs are high, and they are made higher by the long time we devote to training.5

Although it seems unlikely that we’re in a bubble market for medical education, we may already be in one for veterinary medicine. That bubble will burst when potential students recognize that the costs of training aren’t matched by later returns. Then the optometry bubble may burst, followed by the pharmacy and dentistry bubbles. At the extreme, we will march down the debt-to-income-ratio ladder, through psychiatrists to cardiologists to orthopedists . . . until no one is left but the MBAs.

Read Full Post »

Over the last 4 years since I started this blog, I had written numerous articles and in formations about medical education, the life of a doctor and the general misconception of public about medicine. Unfortunately, many refused to believe and remained in denial phase. There were many distractors during my early days of this blog , making unnecessary insulting remarks to me. However, many had to swallow their own words when day by day, everything that I wrote in this blog became a reality. For those who followed this blog since January 2010, you will remember what I wrote about degree recognition issues, the marketing gimmicks of medical colleges, the mushrooming of medical colleges, the possible unemployment of future doctors, the declining income of doctors and many more articles that many refuse to believe. The reality is always a bitter truth that need to be swallowed. Slowly, most of these distractors has “disappeared” from this blog.

Today’s article in the Star by Dr Noorul Ameen (see below) would definitely make many people(public) to be surprised. Unfortunately, that is the reality. Declining incomes of doctors is very much a reality which will continue over the years to come. There will come a time where the income of doctors will not be much of a difference than a teacher or any other profession. The difference will be the money that you would have spent to become one and the increasing litigation rate. The number of medico-legal cases are on the rise and there are many lawyers nowadays who are willing to take up cases against doctors. In US, there are firms who promote themselves as experts in suing medical doctors! This website that belongs to a firm explains what is happening in the US and similarly in many other developed countries. It will only create Cover Backside Medicine(CBM) which in turn will increase the cost of healthcare due to unnecessary investigations.

With close to 34 medical colleges and almost 43 medical programs, we have the highest number of medical colleges per-capita population in the world. MMC was forced to come up with a guideline to prevent these colleges to take unqualified students but the criteria introduced is just too low. Yesterday, I had an interesting conversation with a parent whose daughter has been offered a seat in Perdana UNiversity RCSI for just RM 250K for a course which is supposedly RM 800K! It seems that this offer is being given to those Indian students who scored 4flat but could not gain entrance into public university to do medicine. She is currently doing another course in a public university.The deal is being offered via MIC. Even the RM 250K can be obtained via PTPTN loan and education funds of the party. While I appreciate the “help”   given by this university, I just wonder how a course that supposedly cost RM 800K can suddenly become RM 250K. As far as I know, none of these medical courses are recognised overseas. The first few batches were fully sponsored by the government via a special scholarship program specifically for this university (by PM’s department). Surprisingly, even the campus and the hospital has not started construction yet. If I can remember, the first private teaching hospital suppose to be ready by 2014. This could also indicate that the university is finding it difficult to attract students, especially international students.

Coming back to declining incomes of doctors, many doctors nowadays are trying their luck on unethical practices, aesthetic medicine and complimentary medicines. I know many doctors who have started unproven complimentary medical practices, selling supplements and even becoming official promoter for certain direct selling products. They are just trying to survive. The public still believes that doctors are rich and having easy life…………..

BTW, anyone want to make easy money, please read this SMS that I received yesterday:

Agents wanted to promote Medical, Dental and Pharmacy. Loan PTPTN. Comm : RM 25K. Call 0xxxxxx. www. XXXX.com.my

This SMS is from the same agency which I wrote in my previous article. From 5K it has become 25K!. It is a business and people are trying to make as much money as possible from our ignorant society…………………

When doctors can’t even afford a Proton

IN the old days, doctors drove Volvos but now they cannot even afford a Proton, says Qualitas Healthcare chairman and managing director Datuk Dr Noorul Ameen.

Having treated patients for 20 years, he knows what he’s talking about.

“I told my only child: ‘no way are you going to become a doctor’.

“Ten years ago our consultation fee was RM15 and today it’s still the same – it’s insulting what doctors earn here.

Most general practitioners with standalone clinics earn between RM7,000 and RM9,000 per month but spend about 70% of their revenue on overheads,” he claims, adding that cost of healthcare delivery worldwide has increased and that Malaysia is no exception.

He feels the Government should either support the private healthcare industry or allow the free market to determine healthcare pricing in the country.

Qualitas is a chain of over 200 clinics, dental clinics and pharmacies in Malaysia, India, Singapore, New Zealand and Australia.

Dr Noorul says Qualitas has acquired many clinics in the Klang Valley because GPs cannot sustain their practice.

The Government, he feels, “has no business” telling doctors what to charge if it is not offering tax breaks or incentives for the private sector which provides more than 50% of the nation’s healthcare needs.

“In Australia, the private sector is given grants and incentives to ensure quality and better clinical outcome for our patients.

“Here, many cost-incurring conditions are imposed on us, yet we receive no support from the Government.

“Instead of fault-finding and telling doctors this is the minimum you can charge, the Government should be telling patients what is the minimum they have to pay,” he says.

Dr Noorul, who spent a decade managing hospitals, denies that private hospitals are making huge profits, saying they need to constantly invest in the latest medical advancements.

Poor investment

“Hospitals are the worst investments one can make because the returns don’t justify the huge amounts spent,” he laments, adding that treatment here is cheaper than in Bangladesh.

On claims that doctors are also earning from dispensing medicine, he says the amount is peanuts.

In asking for higher fees, the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA) claims that their 15,000 members comprising general practitioners (GPs) and specialists are “hardly making ends meet” amid rising operations costs.

Patients are expected to pay between 10% and 30% more if the association’s “Medical Procedures and Services Nomenclature and Schedule of Relative Values” is accepted by the Health Ministry (MoH).

The new comprehensive proposal, to be submitted to the MoH by December, will not contain any fees, only relative values (which will be converted to Ringgit) for specialist procedures.

According to MMA president Datuk Dr N.K.S. Tharmaseelan, GPs currently get between RM30 and RM50 per consultation while specialists charge between RM50 and RM80.

“The MoH has approved a 14.4% increase for our consultation and specialist procedure fees but even that hasn’t been gazetted yet,” he says.

Medical Practitioners Coalition Association of Malaysia (MPCAM) and Malaysian Primary Care Network (MPCN) president Dr Jim Loi says the MMA’s call for a 30% hike in doctors’ consultation fees may not be feasible in a sluggish economy.

He adds that together with the Federation of Private Medical Practitioners Association of Malaysia (FPMPAM) and other related bodies, a plan to form the country’s first medical union is underway.

Association of Third Party Medical Claims Administrators Malaysia (TPA) vice-president Paul Cheok says he sympathises with GPs.

He says most GPs are charging rates that are much lower than what’s allowed in the 13th Schedule of the Private Healthcare Facilities and Services (Private Hospitals and Other Private Healthcare Facilities) Regulations 2006.

“The reality is that some GPs are charging as low as RM5 for consultation because competition is too steep.

“For example, if a GP charges a flu patient RM35 for consultation, the bill for cough and cold plus medication could reach RM150. Who can afford that?

“Whether the professional fee hike is 14.4% or 30% is irrelevant because charging what is allowed will result in them not having any patients,” he observes.

To improve the welfare of GPs, the MMA has made several proposals to the MoH.

Dr Tharmaseelan says the MoH is considering allowing all non-communicable disease patients to do follow-up checks at GP clinics.

“The Government will supply the medicine and the GPs are paid a fixed consultation fee.

“We’ve also vociferously opposed the plan to build more 1Malaysia clinics in urban areas where many GP practices are located and requested that existing clinics be manned by private doctors.

“Pilot projects are now being conducted where GPs run the 1Malaysia clinics after office hours,” he says.

To prevent clogging up public hospitals and also to help GPs, the MMA is urging the MoH to foot the bill for public servants who visit private clinics.

Read Full Post »

Many things are changing in this world. The same goes to the field of medicine. It use to be a so-called glamorous job where no one will question whatever you say. Whatever you tell the patients is considered gospel truth and patients will just swallow it. However, times are changing and doctors are finding it difficult to deal with patients. Patients are becoming more demanding and do not hesitate to question you. Internet is both a gift and a curse. Patients come to you after spending some time “google-ing” their symptoms and ask you various questions which you are not prepared for. I have had patients who walk into my room with a diagnosis in their mind and they just want me to confirm it! It does irritate me but I will always tell them that I will decide what need to be done.  But then , there will always be an anxiety at the back of your mind whether you are missing something and  the patient might be right. I am still able to control this anxiety but I am seeing many consultants/doctors out there who practise CBM ( Cover Backside Medicine). They order all sorts of unnecessary investigations just to make sure they do not miss something. This was what happened in US when the litigation rate started to rise which subsequently pushed the healthcare cost up the roof. Likely , the same will happen over here , both in private and public hospitals.  Mind you, government hospitals are also seeing increasing number of medico-legal cases.

The article below was written in the Malaysian Insider today.  I decided to publish it over here as the article do bring up certain issues that are important. I had highlighted some of the sentences for easier reference. In fact, I had written many times in this blog regarding unethical practices and “Cover Backside Medicine” practices in private sector. That’s why I use to say that never judge a book by its cover. Most naive and ethical doctors do not earn much but the unethical doctors may be laughing to the banks. This is partly because, patients tend to believe a doctor who tells them what they want to hear. A doctor who removes an asymptomatic gallstone is good where as a doctor who says nothing need to be done is useless. I believe that patients are partly to be blamed for this.

Coming back to the article below, I personally do not like some of the words used in this article like ” useless doctor” and ” bastard”! This sentence ” “You wonder why we should pay these useless doctors so much when we can find reliable answers online!” is rather annoying. Internet do not really give you reliable answers. I have had many patients who ended up getting anxiety and panic attacks after reading informations in the net. Today, interestingly I even had a patient who diagnosed herself as “bipolar disorder” after reading from the internet!!

But one thing that this article proofs is that patients are becoming more educated, demanding and would not hesitate to take actions against doctors. Gone are the good old days where patients swallow what you say, forgive and forget. The situation is changing rapidly and life is not going to be easy for future doctors. With the deteriorating quality of doctors being produced, the situation is only going to get worst. Many patients are already aware of this scenario of oversupply and under trained doctors. Many of them do go to a few doctors for second opinions.

The rest I will let the readers to read the article below……………….

The sickness of our private healthcare services

OCTOBER 09, 2013

Lim Ka Ea
Lim Ka Ea is a traveller who sees travel as the answer to all the world’s woes. Writing is a grand love. Ka Ea has had NGO and legal experience.

“If I keep this oath faithfully, may I enjoy my life and practise my art, respected by all humanity and in all times; but if I swerve from it or violate it, may the reverse be my life.”
– The Hippocratic Oath

Mary was entering her mid-thirties when it finally dawned on her that she is reproductively challenged. The thought of her own infertility did play in her mind when she was much younger but her suspicion was only confirmed recently when she was diagnosed for polycystic ovarian syndrome (POS). The strange thing was, the diagnosis did not come from her fertility doctor, who had then been too eager to start her and her husband on the notoriously expensive and invasive in vitro treatment, without first examining their health.

The diagnosis for POS had come up through her own initiative. Once she and her husband decided that they would try to conceive through artificial insemination, Mary thought it would be prudent to go through a full medical check-up, “just to make sure my body is ready for the baby, you know. We’ve read that in vitro is very stressful and we want to make sure that we’ve tried everything possible to make sure that the conditions are conducive,” she said.

When her blood work came back, her thyroid function tests were elevated. Later, it was her endocrinologist who told her that in addition to hypothyroidism, she might be suffering from POS too. He told her that the sudden and continuous weight gain, increased cholesterol level, development of fatty liver, irregular menstruation, and acne are some of the symptoms of POS.

Mary had initially thought that these symptoms were attributed to her bad eating habits and sedentary lifestyle but it now explains why these unflattering conditions remain unchanged even after her vigorous attempts to eat and exercise better.

“The funny thing is, no one told me about it. The GP (General Practitioner) at the hospital where I did the full medical check-up did not alert me to anything after he examined my test results. All he did was to make me feel bad about my weight and asked me to take another test in three months’ time to see whether there are any changes to my thyroid functions. All this while, I had been wondering why I’ve been battling bad skin and weight gain. If only I had known earlier, I would have been less depressed and feeling hopeless all the time,” Mary said.

“You have most of the POS symptoms. Go home and do a search online. Read up and learn as much as possible about POS and then go see a gynaecologist to seek treatment. You need to solve all this hormonal issue first before you even try to get pregnant. There are other options before you start considering in vitro. Let’s get you fixed up first, ok?”

That was the most honest and reassuring conversation Mary have had with a doctor so far.

After reading up on hypothyroidism and POS on the Internet, Mary discovered that the chances of having a problematic pregnancy would have been high if she had become pregnant either through natural or artificial means. She confessed that much to her disappointment and great horror, she felt that the renowned fertility specialist she saw at a highly recommended infertility clinic in Kuala Lumpur should have informed her of this vital piece of information.

Mary and her husband initially reasoned that the specialist would have alerted them to her condition if only he had bothered to look at their medical records, which they had brought along with them during their first consultation, having thought pre-emptively that the doctor would have asked for it.

“It was going to cost us about seventeen thousand ringgit for the whole procedure and that doesn’t even cover the cost of a second treatment if the first one doesn’t work. With hypothyroidism and POS, the chances of having a miscarriage would have been great.

“Can you imagine how devastating it would have been if we hadn’t known?” Mary asked and added dejectedly, “The thing is, the doctor didn’t even bother looking at our medical records, you know. They just wanted to make money out of us.”

Mary said that on hindsight now, she is not even sure whether the doctor would have warned them of the potential complications if he had known of her conditions. Mary insisted that her endocrinologist is the minority.

“There are definitely good doctors out there, but they are extremely rare,” she said.  She revealed that she no longer trusts the medical service and would turn to her trusted online sites for all her medical diagnosis and query.

“You wonder why we should pay these useless doctors so much when we can find reliable answers online!” She laughed scornfully.

Mary is not alone when it comes to being at the receiving end of bad medical services and not trusting our medical practitioners. It would appear that more and more private hospitals are abandoning the Hippocratic Oath for personal gain.

A medical practitioner revealed that the price of medicine at a private hospital costs a lot more than an external pharmacy. He often advises his patients to buy their medicine from external pharmacies because it makes no sense for them to pay “cut-throat” prices for the same medicine. However, when Kelly tried to do precisely that, the doctor treating her apparently did not take it too well.

“Instead of giving me a prescription for six months as he had recommended, the bastard only prescribed me a month’s worth of medication. In other words, he was ‘forcing’ me to go back to him for a follow-up prescription and that would have meant paying him ninety ringgit for just a bloody piece of paper. Can you imagine that?!”

The Department of Pharmaceutical Services at the Ministry of Health informed that there is currently no law to control the prices of medication at private hospitals. However, it is encouraging when the Head of the Medicine Pricing Unit wrote, “As a patient, you have the right to obtain a prescription from your doctor to buy your medicine from any pharmacy even though it displeases the doctor. I believe that empowered patients can change the current bad habits practised by medical professions so that we can all guarantee affordable medication for the people.”

Vikram, another unhappy patient, shared the experience he had with his doctor when he was undergoing treatment for Hepatitis C. He said that he was mortified when the nurse asked about his treatment in front of other patients while he was waiting for his doctor in a clinic. He understood that the nurse probably asked out of customary politeness but he did not appreciate the fact that in the course of her doing so, other people had learned about his medical condition.

He said that patient information management is lacking in many healthcare facilities and was shocked that this clinic is part of a hospital that has received an accreditation from the Malaysian Society for Quality in Health (MSQH), the national accrediting body for healthcare facilities and services.

“On top of that, my doctor failed to inform me of all the side effects of the antiviral medication I was taking. There was no counselling or support for me and my spouse. The repercussions of the medication was so great that I felt as if the treatment had ruined an important part of our lives. 

“For each visit, I paid ninety ringgit for a five-minute consultation where the doctor did practically nothing. Thankfully I had a good insurance coverage because the medication cost an arm and a leg. To be honest, I wish I had not undergone this treatment if only I had known of the repercussions. I wasn’t informed properly,” Vikram said regretfully.

As of June this year, 75 percent of public hospitals have received the MSQH accreditation while only 25 percent of private hospitals have. At the international level, only eight hospitals have received the Joint Commission International (JCI)’s accreditation.

The JCI is created by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organisations, a US government agency, aimed to improve the safety and quality of care in the international community through the provision of education and advisory services, and international accreditation and certification.

The assessment criteria used by the MSQH is quite similar to the one used by the JCI, except the latter provides additional components such as patient and family education, staff qualifications and education, medication management and use, and the assessment and care of patients; elements which seem to be sorely lacking in our own private healthcare services.

Previously, the government has made several attempts to make it mandatory for all public and private hospitals to obtain MSQH accreditation but these attempts have been put on hold thus far. Although having some sort of national or international accreditation by a recognised and credible agency does boost public confidence, alongside minimising and mitigating clinical and safety related risks, these accreditations do not take into account public rating. The application submission for accreditation is done by the hospital in question and the assessment is then carried out by a panel of surveyors appointed by the accreditation agency.

There is no consideration for public opinion on how the hospital has fared.

“As a patient, I would like us to have some sort of a scorecard for all the hospital in Malaysia. Something simple for a start and it can be done by civil society, someone independent and done from the patient’s perspectives.

“What we need is someone who will disguise as a patient to test out the hospitals. So you have this person who goes to several hospitals and says he’s got liver problem, for instance, and then he assesses how the hospitals handle him based on selected key criteria. The problem has to be the same though, so you can compare apple for apple,” Vikram suggested thoughtfully.

Kelly said the hospital’s ability to deal with complaints is something left to be desired.

“No point. I’ve written to a hospital before to express my dissatisfaction over their service. I haven’t received any response from them. This was last year. It’s like as if the hospital doesn’t really care if you’re unhappy with them. They have patients lined up anyway. So why should they care?”

Sumitra, who is married to a doctor, revealed that medical practitioners often tend to close an eye when their colleagues commit a medical error. This culture is deeply rooted on the notion of solidarity akin to “I have your back now so that when I need you, you’ll have mine.” 

This makes it virtually impossible to have a doctor testifies against the other, even when a grave error occurs at the expense of a patient’s life.

Perhaps what Malaysia needs is a patients association such as the one in the United Kingdom. The UK’s Patients Association provides a platform for the people to rate their National Health Service (NHS). The association also runs educational campaigns such as the Speaking Up Complaints Project which encourages patients to speak up against poor medical services and the NHS to improve the way it deals with patients’ complaints. The NHS is ranked as one of the top 20 best healthcare services in the world by the World Health Organisation.

Not all is lost. Malaysia seems to be doing remarkably well in the area of medical tourism. A private hospital in Kuala Lumpur is recently recognised by the Medical Travel Quality Alliance as one of the world’s top ten best hospitals for medical tourists. By taking advantage of the weaker Malaysian currency, foreigners from the Middle East, Europe and Japan are flocking to Malaysia to enjoy better medical treatment.

It would have cost the local patients an arm and a leg to receive treatment in these hospitals but Mary said, “If the service is compatible with the amount I pay for, why not? The problem with the private hospitals here is that I’m not even getting the value for my money.”

While our private hospitals continue to nurse tourists with top notch care, in order to stay competitive alongside South Korea, Thailand and Turkey, have they forgot about our own illnesses along the way? – October 9, 2013.

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.

 

Read Full Post »

I just completed the “Walk a Payung” event for SLE association of Malaysia, Johor chapter this morning.  It was the second time we were having this event in JB and we received a wonderful response despite a rainy day. I had a oppurtunity to talk to few people from MOH and a public university academic on few interesting issues.

The issue about medical education and oversupply of doctors has been discussed several times in this blog since 2010. Unfortunately, I still get asked many repeated questions about the situation and some still feel that it will not happen. A few recent comments in this blog said that they are still short of manpower in certain departments in their hospital. I have said it many times before that MALDISTRIBUTION is the main problem. The maldistribution is not only between the departments but also between hospitals and regions. The shortage now is mainly in East Peninsular states and East Malaysia ( compared to the number of post available). In terms of specialist, I do agree that we have severe shortage of specialist in government hospitals. That’s the reason why there are not enough people to train the juniors and the entire system is collapsing when it comes to quality. I was informed today that all the public universities are scaling down their intake. UM has scaled down from 200+ students to 180 this year and subsequently to 150 next year. Unfortunately, the private universities are increasing their intakes to make as much money as possible before the market gets saturated, as what happened to the nurses.

The government is chasing after the ratio of 1: 400 by 2020 which is the reason why they approved too many medical schools. Unfortunately, they have miscalculated as medical education is not like any other field. The training after graduation is very important and we need to have enough consultants to do that. Many people out there still think that post-graduate education in medicine is similar to other courses where they attend a 4 years FULL-TIME course and woolah, they are a specialist! I get asked this question again and again. Let me tell you that post-graduate education in medicine is “FULL TIME” working and “PART TIME” studying.  You still need to work as anyone else while studying for your exams and doing your thesis. That’s the reason why you can’t go overseas to do your post-graduate education if your degree is not recognised elsewhere. The Ministry is running out of post and this has been confirmed to me by many MOH officials. New posts are being created but it is unlikely to solve the problem as the numbers will not be enough. The number of Master’s slot is also being increased but again, it is unlikely to cope with the exponential increase in the number of graduates. I was informed by MOH officials that they will soon officially allow doctors to apply for other jobs.

Now, coming back to “chasing after the ratio”, it is not going to make any difference. Klang Valley has a doctor:population ratio of 1: 450 currently but why do the public hospitals still complain of shortage ? This is because, majority of the specialist are in private sector. A report in NST yesterday says that we have 200 gazetted cardiologist in Malaysia BUT only 30 is in government sector. That’s  the problem that we are facing. If you include all the private and public hospital’s number of beds and doctors in Klang valley, we have more than enough BUT 80% of patients go to public hospitals when 60-70% of the specialists are in private sector !. So, it is an “artificial ” shortage which will never end. A public -private integration will be needed to solve this problem.

Thus, achieving the ratio is not going to solve any problems. Even after the government had achieved the ratio, similar complains of shortage, long waiting hours for patients and long working hours will still be heard. By being a doctor, you can’t run away from being overworked and working long hours. You are dealing with lives and there is no such thing as “office hour” job.  Everyone(including parents) who intend to do medicine must be aware of this before doing medicine for “good life, good money and good future”, a false perception by many. An article written in this blog by a medical officer is a good read for ALL. It tells you a life as a doctor in a government hospital. The situation is unlikely to change even when the government achieves the ratio. The situation is not much of a difference compared to developed countries like US as written over here (see below).

Finally, I received the following SMS few days ago which is self-explanatory:

Vanakam, we are a medical students placement agency. We are looking for agents. WE pay commision up to RM 5,000 – interested Pls do call xxxxxxxx (Mr XXXX) TQ. www ………………com.my

When I visited their website it says ” Confirm Seat! “………………….. Gosh, how low the level of medical education has become………………

Anyone wants to make easy money? be an agent !! Recruit 10 students a month and you get RM 50K. No wonder many parents get cheated by the agents.

Long Work Hours Wreak Havoc in MDs’ Personal Lives

All Work, No Play a Recipe for Family Conflict, Depression, and Burnout

Fran Lowry

Sep 23, 2013

All work and no play is a recipe for family conflict, depression, and burnout in physicians, especially among those who are in dual-career relationships, new research shows.

A survey of some 90,000 US physicians across all specialties and their working partners shows that many respondents report frequent work-home conflicts (WHC) due to the long hours they spend at work, causing them to suffer burnout, depression, and poor quality of life.

“Work-home conflicts are common in physicians and in the partners of physicians,” lead author Liselotte N. Dyrbye, MD, from the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, told Medscape Medical News.

“We found that younger physicians, female physicians, and physicians who work in academic medical centers are the ones who are more likely to have work-home conflicts, and that these conflicts are driven by a lot of work hours,” Dr. Dyrbye said.

“This makes sense, because the more hours you work, the more opportunity there is for work-home conflicts,” she said.

The study was published online September 17 in the Journal of General Internal Medicine.

Choosing Work Over Home

Previous work conducted by this same team of investigators has examined work-home conflicts in US surgeons and academic internal medicine physicians.

The current study extends this research by looking at the issue of work-home conflict in a broader, more diverse group of physicians as well as in their partners.

In the current study, Dr. Dyrbye and her research team surveyed 89,831 physicians from all specialties listed in the Physician Masterfile. Of these, 7288 (27.7%) physicians completed the survey.

Of the physicians who completed the survey, 1644 provided their partner’s contact information.

These partners were in turn surveyed, and 891 (54%) responded.

The median age of the physicians and their partners was 55 years and 51 years, respectively. Most (89.2% of physicians and 86.6% of partners) had children. The majority of physicians were male (75.2%), and most partners were female (73.0%).

Slightly more than half of the partners (n = 503, 56.5%) were employed, reporting a median of 40.0 hours of work per week. Also, most of the employed partners were working in nonmedical professions (58.2%); 40.9% worked in healthcare.

The survey results showed that 44.3% of physicians and 55.7% of employed partners experienced a work-home conflict in the last 3 weeks. Most were able to resolve their conflicts in a way that allowed their home and work responsibilities to be met.

However, physicians tended to choose work responsibilities over home responsibilities, with 28.4% reporting that they resolved their work-home conflict in favour of work, and 10.9% of physicians reporting they resolved the conflict in favor of home.

Compared with physicians, more employed partners tended to put home before work, with fewer (19.7%) choosing to resolve their work-home conflict in favour of work, and 20.1% choosing home.

Dose-Dependent Relationship

The more hours worked, the greater the work-home conflicts. Multivariate analysis showed that for each additional 10 hours per week worked, the odds ratio for a work-home conflict was 1.31 for physicians and 1.23 for their working partners (< .0001).

Work-home conflicts were also associated with more burnout, depression, and poor quality of life.

Physicians with work-home conflicts were 47.1% more likely to have symptoms of burnout, compared with 26.6% for physicians without work-home conflicts. The trend was similar for the employed partners, with 42.4% having symptoms of burnout if they had work-home conflicts, compared with 23.8% with no work-home conflicts.

Both physicians and their employed partners with a recent work-home conflict were also more likely to have symptoms of depression, substantially lower overall mental and physical quality of life, and worse fatigue. Both groups were also more likely to be less satisfied with their partner and to be considering getting a separation or a divorce.

“These work-home conflicts are very important and have serious ramifications,” Dr. Dyrbye said.

“We hope that our research draws attention to the fact that with more and more dual career relationships, work-home conflicts are something that managers and leaders of organizations need to be aware of and find solutions for, that it’s not just an individual problem, and it can’t just be up to the working spouse to try to figure it out,” she added. “I hope that people can look closely at their policies and the opportunities for dual-career professionals to thrive within the organization.”

A Warning

Commenting on the findings for Medscape Medical News, Michael Myers, MD, professor of clinical psychiatry, State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, said that the study is an important warning to young professionals that too much work may be putting their quality of life and their physical and mental health at risk.

“This paper gives us more ammunition to be able to tell our medical students that if you consistently work more than 56 hours…a week, and keep doing it over time, and your spouse is working 40 hours or more a week, you are really putting your conflict level and your relationship at risk, and you are putting yourself at risk for burnout. Perhaps this is an argument for people to cut back on their work hours,” Dr. Myers, who is a coauthor, with Glen Gabbard, MD, of The Physician as Patient: A Clinical Handbook for Mental Health Professionals, said.

“I am very involved in medical education now, and it is good to have this kind of a study and to be able to explain to medical students and to residents that they have got to pay attention to these things, because these stresses are what their fathers and mothers who are a generation older are experiencing,” he added.

The study was funded by the American Medical Association and the Mayo Clinic Department of Medicine Program on Physician Well-being. Dr. Dyrbye and Dr. Myers report no relevant financial relationships.

J Gen Intern Med. Published online September 17, 2013. Abstract

Read Full Post »

Over the last few months, the mainstream newspaper has been writing regarding the increase in doctors fee over and over again with multiple letters to the editor. The government has “sort of” approved a 14% hike in fees which is yet to be made official but the newspapers are running articles after articles as though the world is coming to an end. I had written about the issue over here and here. Today, the Star had yet again ran an article ( here and here) regarding this issue, comparing with the proposed fee increase by MMA.

Obviously, our FOMCA representative and TPA VIce President do not know what they are talking about. The doctor’s fee has not increased since the last 15-20 years. A surgeon who has been in private practise for 20 years told me that his fee for doing an appendicectomy has not increased since he started his private practise! However, the total cost of an appendicectomy has increased from RM 2-3 000 when he first started, to about RM 7-8 000 currently! So, where are the extra charges coming from ? The answer is very simple, it is the hospital charges that has increased by leaps and bounds. But why over all these years, this so-called consumer association does not make any noise but when the doctors request for a 15-30% hike in their fee after 20 years, the whole world goes into chaos! The doctor’s fee are regulated by the government but not the hospital’s fee. If they are really sincere, they should go after the hospital’s fee which they would not, as almost all private hospitals are owned by GLC aka the government !

As what MMA President has said in the articles below, many doctors are struggling to meet the ends. The income of doctors are gradually declining as I had mentioned many times before but the cost of running a service has increased tremendously. The public feels that all doctors in private hospitals are employed by the hospital which is obviously not true. I had many of my patients who also thought the same until I told them the reality. We are just renting a room in the hospital to run our service. We have to pay a monthly rental and the hospital will also take 10-15% of our consultation fee as their administrative fee. Only the balance of our consultation and surgical fees are given to us. Then we have to pay for our indemnity insurance which is also increasing by about 8-10% annually. When there is any legal suit, the hospital will wash off their hands and you have to deal with it. The recent appeal court’s decision in awarding RM 3.5 million(not including interest) has set a new benchmark for further medico-legal suits in this country. That’s the reason MMI has increased their indemnity insurance for O&G by almost 100% this year.

As for the public, private healthcare is an option. No one is forcing you to go to a private hospital/clinic. The government hospitals and clinics are always available for you with a very minimal charge of RM 1-5. So, why complain. If you choose to go to a private hospital, then don’t make a fuss out of it. Most patient who attend private hospitals nowadays are insurance paid. Only about 10-20% of patients are self paying. This is the trend that we are seeing lately. Insurance companies on the other hand are finding it difficult to cope with the increase in private healthcare cost. They have started to question many of the decisions made by doctors in the management of the patients. They are even scrutinising each and every blood test and X-rays that are done. There will come a point where it will collapse. Any increase in premium is not sustainable and this will lead to their inability to pay the hospitals. The bigger private hospitals will then not be able to sustain the operational cost and will eventually collapse. That’s what happened in the US in 1990s and many big tertiary hospitals collapsed due to high overhead cost. They restructured their hospitals with small community based hospital and 1-2 big tertiary hospital in each district. The insurance companies now dictate everything, as I had written over here. Similar situation will happen over here eventually.

So, for those who do medicine thinking that they are going to make tonnes of money in the future by spending RM 500K for their “undergraduate” education ( which is of no value in the future without further postgraduate education) , please rethink your decision carefully. THink what you can do with that amount of money in so many other ways. Many out there think that medical postgraduate education is similar to undergraduate education. How ignorant our society has become. I had written about medical postgraduate education in this blog since I started blogging in 2010 but yet I get asked the same questions repeatedly. I can only say one thing: current generation do not read and want to be spoon-fed all the time. I don’t know how they are going to become a doctor where you need to read and search literature throughout your life………………..

Finally, I was happy to meet DR Jim Loi today in JB ( sitting beside in the photo below). He is the President of MPCAM and MPCN which is a coalition of doctors whose objective is  to create unity among doctors to stand as one voice. I wish him best of luck. I once wrote an article in MMA in 2006 ” Rebranding and Restructuring of MMA: An urgent need for a Revolution”. I hope MPCN can achieve what I had suggested then.

Good luck to you, Bro……………

Patients brace for a ‘deeper cut’ over fees for specialist procedures

BY CHRISTINA CHIN
SGCHRIS@THESTAR.COM.MY

PETALING JAYA: Patients will have to brace themselves for a “deeper cut” if a proposal to increase fees for specialist procedures is adopted by the government.

Association of Third Party Medical Claims Administrators Malaysia (TPA) vice-president Paul Cheok said the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), in asking for a 30% increase in consultation charges last month, had also proposed staggering increases in charges for specialist procedures.

TPA members, who form part of the country’s managed care organisations, provide administrative and medical claim processing services for insurance companies and more than 1,000 employers, mostly corporations.

“We are not against the approved 14.5% hike in consultation fees agreed on by the Health Ministry, but the MMA’s proposal for an increase in surgical procedures and anaesthetist fees must not be allowed. Patient volume has increased over the years, so based on the current rates, specialists are already fairly compensated,” he said.

“Specialists think private hospitals make a lot of money, but the reverse is true.”

TPA estimates that there are about 800 to 1,000 procedures listed in the 5th Edition of the MMA Fee Schedule.

Cheok said the MMA must also justify why certain procedures have been upgraded to a higher surgical fee category.

“Some procedures which were previously categorised as minor, have been pushed into the ‘major category’.

“Coupled with the new rates, this will lead to patients paying more than 200% of current charges.

“Patients should be more concerned over the proposed cost of surgical procedures instead of worrying about a rise in consultation fees,” he said, adding that often, one operation consists of multiple surgical procedures which could lead to multiple charges.

MMA president Datuk Dr NKS Tharmaseelan however said specialist procedure fees in Malaysia were still the lowest in the region.

He said doctors should not be blamed for high hospital bills as their fees only amounted to 20% of the bills.

“If hospital bills have risen, it is due to the hospitals charging higher fees for their services and other items,” he claimed.

“Many specialists in private practice can hardly make ends meet. And, they have to pay exorbitant indemnity insurance. For example, obstetricians and gynaecologist and plastic surgeons pay almost RM80,000 per annum in premiums.”

On TPA’s claim that MMA’s proposal to increase the fees for surgical procedures would lead to patients paying more than 200% than current charges, he said their calculations for the new fee rates for specialist procedures were “mere conjecture”.

“I don’t know where they are plucking the numbers from,” he said.

Medical Practitioners Coalition Association of Malaysia (MPCAM) and Malaysian Primary Care Network (MPCN) president Dr Jim Loi said the proposed rate for procedures are justified if “100% goes to the specialists”.

“The cost of items and materials have risen in tandem with the current economic state and the total cost of procedures. Specialists need to invest a lot of money,” he said.

Consumers unhappy with ‘secrecy’ over private healthcare charges

PETALING JAYA: Consumers are unhappy that private healthcare charges are still being shrouded in secrecy, said Federation of Malaysian Consu­mers Association (Fomca) secretary-general Datuk Paul Selvaraj.

“Will consumers only find out about the increase in specialist fees after they are slapped with a hefty bill?” he asked.

“The fees must be put on hospital websites so that consumers can compare healthcare charges. Now, consumers are paying ‘5-star rates’ without knowing what it’s for.”

Health director-general Datuk Dr Noor Hisham Abdullah said most of the professional fees submitted by the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA) in its latest proposal increased by 30% from the last one.

“However, all medical practitioners in private hospitals have always adhered to the 13th Schedule of the Private Healthcare Facilities and Services (Private Hospitals and Other Private Healthcare Facilities) Regulations 2006 for their professional fees,” he added.

He said the ministry would add new clauses to the regulations to reduce any attempt by medical practitioners to manipulate the cost of procedures.

MMA president Datuk N.K.S. Tharmaseelan explained that the association was preparing a new, comprehensive fee schedule which would cover new procedures, such as advanced robotic and computer-assisted navigational surgery.

Dr Tharmaseelan also dismissed a claim that specialists earn RM150,000 monthly, saying most specialists only earn an average of RM25,000 to RM30,000 per month.

On Aug 23, a reader from Kuala Lumpur claimed that a private specialist earns an average of RM150,000 per month and “have ways to fleece the patients”.

Citing an example, he said an ENT surgeon could do an operation and charge for four separate procedures.

 

Jim Loi

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »