Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Finally, I manage to get a locum cover for Chinese New Year 2012. It was the best time to cross the causeway without any traffic. Thus, I decided to bring my family for a short entertainment across the causeway on the first day of CNY.

For those who can’t remember, Universal Studio was supposed to be in Nusajaya, Malaysia initially. Way back in the year 2000, Universal studio was already in talks with Malaysian authority to build a theme park in Nusajaya. I personally saw the MBJB master plan in the year 2000. However, some how it did not get throu’ and I am not sure why. We have a bigger and cheaper land than Singapore. I feel it must be the bureaucracy, rules and regulation that put them off. Finally we had to turn to Legoland which will open its door in June 2012 in Nusajaya.

Unfortunately, it was Singapore who benefitted. Surprisingly, Universal Studio Singapore belongs to Genting Berhad which is a Malaysian company!! How ironic!

The best ride was this:

I must say it lives up to its name as the world’s first Transformers ride. A virtual 3D action where you feel like you are in the movie! I would recommend this to anyone who visit Universal Studio Singapore.

The rest of the rides were awesome as well. The cyclone roller coaster was really scary. Lucky I do not have any cardiac disease yet. Felt like I was flying 14 storeys high

It was exhausting I must say. I spend almost the whole day from 10am to 7.30pm walking and taking rides with my kids/wife etc.

Despite that, I could not finish all the attractions in the park. The Mummy indoor roller coaster with visual effects was also excellent.

After all these tiring rides, the best part was when I could drive back to my house in JB in less than an hour !! NO JAM at all…………………………….

Looking forward for another visit in a year’s time.

Didn’t I say this almost 2 years ago? https://pagalavan.com/2010/04/27/no-more-nursing-schools-from-july/. The government stopped new nursing colleges from July 2010 onwards but this was what I said then:

 “It is good that the government is going to stop new nursing colleges but will this solve the problem? The existing nursing colleges itself are producing thousands of nurses of doubtful quality and they will keep producing them to get profit. So the number of new nurses will continue to be produced by these colleges, or may even increase! Even now, there are fresh nurses who are unable to find a job as the government service seem to be saturated with them.”

This was 2 years ago and now, the article below written by Dr Jeyakumar clearly illustrates the current situation. I predicted this to happen and it is happening. The number of application for nursing job in my hospital is piling up day by day. Many of them are totally below par in quality and not even employable. I was made to understand that you just need 1 credit in SPM to be eligible to do nursing!! You don’t need to pay anything as the college will apply for PTPTN loan for you. And woolah, you will do the course for free and become unemployed later. Who cares about job prospects as the college has already made the money.

The same situation is also happening for radiographers, physiotherapist and pharmacy dispensers. All these private colleges are recruiting students into this courses by giving false information that there is severe shortage. Obviously the Ministry of Higher Education is sleeping or not bothered at all as we are “education hub” , mah…………

What’s next? Unemployed doctors……………………… the same scenario is already happening for medicine and thus the “so-called” moratorium of medical schools last year. BUT every medical college ( 36 of them) seem to be increasing the number of intake year by year, even introducing newer twining programmes. Housemanship is now given on contract basis and I can see some shocking news waiting for them when they finish housemanship in 2 years time.

Thousands of private college nursing grads jobless — Jeyakumar Devaraj

January 14, 2012

JAN 14 — The Higher Education Ministry’s failure to control the greed of private nursing colleges has established a situation in which thousands of their graduates are jobless. And yet, these graduates are burdened with PTPTN loans of as much as RM50,000 to RM60,000.

Here are the facts:

● 61 private institutions have been given the go-ahead by the Higher Education Ministry to conduct nursing courses;

● there are currently more than 37,500 nursing undergraduates enrolled in these 61 private learning institutions. A large percentage of these undergraduates have acquired the PTPTN loan, normally around RM55,000;

● the total amount of staff nurses employed throughout the country as of December 2010 was 61,110. Of that total, 47,992 were stationed in the government sector and the remainder 21,118 in the private sector;

● in 2010, 7,665 nursing graduates from private institutions sat for the Nursing Board examination. Only 70.1 per cent of them passed the examination compared to the passing rate of 98.4 per cent amongst graduates from Health Ministry colleges.

● Only 42.7 per cent of nursing graduates from private higher education institutions in 2010 succeeded in acquiring jobs at hospitals and clinics

Taking all these facts into account, we wish to know the following:

● Is it the Higher Education Ministry that determines the intake quotas for nursing courses in private educational institutions in Malaysia? If so, what is the rationale for allowing an intake quota of 9,000 undergraduates for the year 2011?

● Is the minister aware that every trained nurse must renew his or her professional licence (APC — Annual Practising Certificate) every year? One of the terms that is required to acquire the APC is an occupational status as a nurse in a hospital. Therefore, if one is unable to get employed as a nurse, he or she is not eligible to renew his or her APC.

● Is the minister aware that the marketability of a staff nurse will be adversely affected if she is unable to get a nursing post in a hospital? This is due to the fact that a nurse’s skills will deteriorate if the graduate is not given a chance to practise as a nurse.

● Is the minister aware that a lot of the graduates at nursing private higher education institutions originate from families that are not rich? They are hoping to get a job as a nurse in order to pay back their PTPTN loans and to aid their respective families.

● Is the minister aware that repayment of the PTPTN loan is required even if the graduate is unable to acquire a job as a nurse?

● How many of the 61 private higher education institutions currently offering nursing courses have started or are applying to start medicine courses to train doctors?

Our demands:

● Freeze the intake of new students into private nursing colleges. The market is flooded at this point in time. Do not burden more young girls with PTPTN loans that they will not be able to pay back.

● Look into the other courses that are offered by the private colleges such as physiotherapy, health care, laboratory assistants, and radiology. If there exists a similar situation of over-supply for these other courses as well, please freeze the intake of new students into these courses.

● Reject applications of private higher education institutions to conduct medicine courses if the passing rate in the Nursing Board examination was below 90 per cent for graduates from those institutions in 2010 or 2009.

● Take over the PTPTN debts for all nurse graduates who have not acquired a nursing post in hospitals despite passing the Nursing Board’s examination.

● Conduct an investigation to determine why the market for trained nurses is flooded — 37,500 will graduate in three years, whereas the need for nurses is only 1,500 per year (more or less five per cent of the total currently employed in the private sector). Is this because of poor judgment on the part of officials who determine the quota or is corruption involved? The profits of private higher education institutions are immense!

● Review the validity of the policy of relying on private companies to provide higher education for our younger generation. It is evidently clear from the actions of the private nursing colleges that maximising profits is their main focus! The existence of PTPTN loans has underwritten the income of these private higher education institutions, and they are currently competing to attract as many students as possible without a care as to whether they can provide adequate practical exposure to their students or whether there are sufficient job opportunities for their graduates.

We hope that the Higher Education Ministry officials will study the issues that we have brought up and fix a date within a month’s time to inform us of the steps that will be taken by the ministry to manage the identified problems in this memorandum. — aliran.com

* The above article is a memorandum submitted by Dr Jeyakumar Devaraj to the Higher Education Minister on December 13, 2011 expressing concern about the high number of unemployed nursing graduates.

* Dr Jeyakumar Devaraj is the member of Parliament for Sungai Siput.

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication. The Malaysian Insider does not endorse the view unless specified.

A government doctor/specialist is being charged in court for molesting a patient: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/1/12/courts/10244849&sec=courts. Will the government provide the fund? I don’t think so and I am pretty sure that this doctor do not have any indemnity insurance to cover for himself (being a civil servant). BTW this will be a criminal charge and not a medical negligence.

As I have said before, litigation rate is going up everywhere especially in Klang Valley and cases like this are going to increase day by day. As doctors, we should be very careful with what we do. Make sure that we have a chaperone every time in our room or while you are examining a female patient. I am not sure what actually happened in the case below but I presume that he did a pelvic examination on this pregnant patient without first informing the patient and without a chaperone. If they have charged him in court means that the police has found enough evidence.

The government has already advised all government doctors to take their own medical indemnity insurance. It may be made compulsory soon. I will also advise female doctors to have a chaperone when examining a male patient. Vice versa can also happen !!

Doc charged with molesting pregnant patient

KUALA LUMPUR: An obstetrician has been charged at a magistrate’s court here with molesting his pregnant patient.

Dr Mohd Suhaidin Che Ngah, 36, claimed trial to using criminal force to outrage the modesty of a 27-year-old woman by touching her private parts at Hospital Sungai Buloh at 2.15pm on Nov 11 last year.

He seemed unfazed when the charges were read, even smiling throughout the hearing.

The offence, under Section 354 of the Penal Code, carries a maximum 10 years’ jail term or a fine or whipping, or any two such punishments, upon conviction.

DPP Nur Hidayah Raihan Md Nasir proposed bail at RM7,000.

However, Dr Mohd Suhaidin’s brother, who was his surety, sought a lower sum.

Magistrate Namirah Hanum Mohamad Albaki set bail at RM5,500 with one surety and fixed March 26 for mention.

Will this situation appear in Malaysia soon? I am afraid the time will come. In fact it has already started to happen. I am beginning to see doctors closing shop and jumping from one hospital to another for survival. With the glut that is coming, the situation will only get worst. This article appeared in CNNMoney  and below this I have attached some info regarding 1Care system.

Small Business: Doctors going broke
By Parija Kavilanz | CNNMoney.com – Thu, Jan 5, 2012 12:37 PM EST 

Doctors in America are harboring an embarrassing secret: Many of them are going broke.

This quiet reality, which is spreading nationwide, is claiming a wide range of casualties, including family physicians, cardiologists and oncologists.

Industry watchers say the trend is worrisome. Half of all doctors in the nation operate a private practice. So if a cash crunch forces the death of an independent practice, it robs a community of a vital health care resource.

“A lot of independent practices are starting to see serious financial issues,” said Marc Lion, CEO of Lion & Company CPAs, LLC, which advises independent doctor practices about their finances.

Doctors list shrinking insurance reimbursements, changing regulations, rising business and drug costs among the factors preventing them from keeping their practices afloat. But some experts counter that doctors’ lack of business acumen is also to blame.

Loans to make payroll: Dr. William Pentz, 47, a cardiologist with a Philadelphia private practice, and his partners had to tap into their personal assets to make payroll for employees last year. “And we still barely made payroll last paycheck,” he said. “Many of us are also skimping on our own pay.”

Pentz said recent steep 35% to 40% cuts in Medicare reimbursements for key cardiovascular services, such as stress tests and echocardiograms, have taken a substantial toll on revenue. “Our total revenue was down about 9% last year compared to 2010,” he said.

“These cuts have destabilized private cardiology practices,” he said. “A third of our patients are on Medicare. So these Medicare cuts are by far the biggest factor. Private insurers follow Medicare rates. So those reimbursements are going down as well.”

12 entrepreneurs reinventing health care

Pentz is thinking about an out. “If this continues, I might seriously consider leaving medicine,” he said. “I can’t keep working this way.”

Also on his mind, the impending 27.4% Medicare pay cut for doctors. “If that goes through, it will put us under,” he said.

Federal law requires that Medicare reimbursement rates be adjusted annually based on a formula tied to the health of the economy. That law says rates should be cut every year to keep Medicare financially sound.

Although Congress has blocked those cuts from happening 13 times over the past decade, most recently on Dec. 23 with a two-month temporary “patch,” this dilemma continues to haunt doctors every year.

Beau Donegan, senior executive with a hospital cancer center in Newport Beach, Calif., is well aware of physicians’ financial woes.

“Many are too proud to admit that they are on the verge of bankruptcy,” she said. “These physicians see no way out of the downward spiral of reimbursement, escalating costs of treating patients and insurance companies deciding when and how much they will pay them.”

Donegan knows an oncologist “with a stellar reputation in the community” who hasn’t taken a salary from his private practice in over a year.  He owes drug companies $1.6 million, which he wasn’t reimbursed for.

Dr. Neil Barth is that oncologist. He has been in the top 10% of oncologists in his region, according to U.S. News Top Doctors’ ranking. Still, he is contemplating personal bankruptcy.

That move could shutter his 31-year-old clinical practice and force 6,000 cancer patients to look for a new doctor.

Changes in drug reimbursements have hurt him badly. Until the mid-2000’s, drugs sales were big profit generators for oncologists.

In oncology, doctors were allowed to profit from drug sales. So doctors would buy expensive cancer drugs at bulk prices from drugmakers and then sell them at much higher prices to their patients.

“I grew up in that system. I was spending $1.5 million a month on buying treatment drugs,” he said. In 2005, Medicare revised the reimbursement guidelines for cancer drugs, which effectively made reimbursements for many expensive cancer drugs fall to less than the actual cost of the drugs.

“Our reimbursements plummeted,” Barth said.

Still, Barth continued to push ahead with innovative research, treating patients with cutting-edge expensive therapies, accepting patients who were underinsured only to realize later that insurers would not pay him back for much of his care.

“I was $3.2 million in debt by mid 2010,” said Barth. “It was a sickening feeling. I could no longer care for patients with catastrophic illnesses without scrutinizing every penny first.”

He’s since halved his debt and taken on a second job as a consultant to hospitals. But he’s still struggling and considering closing his practice in the next six months.

“The economics of providing health care in this country need to change. It’s too expensive for doctors,” he said. “I love medicine. I will find a way to refinance my debt and not lose my home or my practice.”

If he does declare bankruptcy, he loses all of it and has to find a way to start over at 60. Until then, he’s turning away new patients whose care he can no longer subsidize.

“I recently got a call from a divorced woman with two kids who is unemployed, house in foreclosure with advanced breast cancer,” he said. “The moment has come to this that you now say, ‘sorry, we don’t have the capacity to care for you.’ ”

Small business 101: A private practice is like a small business. “The only thing different is that a third party, and not the customer, is paying for the service,” said Lion.

“Many times I shake my head,” he said. “Doctors are trained in medicine but not how to run a business.” His biggest challenge is getting doctors to realize where and how their profits are leaking.

“On average, there’s a 10% to 15% profit leak in a private practice,” he said. Much of that is tied to money owed to the practice by patients or insurers. “This is also why they are seeing a cash crunch.”

My biggest tax nightmare!

Dr. Mike Gorman, a family physician in Loganvale, Nev., recently took out an SBA loan to keep his practice running and pay his five employees.

“It is embarrassing,” he said. “Doctors don’t want to talk about being in debt.” But he’s planning a new strategy  to deal with his rising business expenses and falling reimbursements.

“I will see more patients, but I won’t check all of their complaints at one time,” he explained. “If I do, insurance will bundle my reimbursement into one payment.”   Patients will have to make repeat visits — an arrangement that he acknowledges is “inconvenient.”

“This system pits doctor against patient,” he said. “But it’s the only way to beat the system and get paid.”

— Are you a doctor who has made financial decisions you came to regret? E-mail Parija Kavilanzand you could be part of an upcoming article. Click here for CNNMoney.com comment policy.

 
Salient points – 1Care

1. The government plans to introduce a new healthcare system called 1-Care. It includes an insurance system to fund for healthcare.

2. The National Healthcare Financing Authority will be in charge of 1Care – and …it is likely to be turned into a GLC.

3. Based on available information, every household will be made to pay up to 9.4% of gross household income for social health insurance. The payers will be the individual, the employer and the government via taxes, exact proportion still being worked out)

4. There shall be no choice. Everyone has to pay. There is no opting out. We have to pay upfront. It will no longer be fee-for-service; it is fee-before- service.

5. There has been no information on exactly how this payment will have to be made or how the government will collect from self-employed people.

6. The government will be expected to contribute to the insurance premiums of government pensioners, civil servants and five dependants.

7. But the problem is: 1Care does not cover all your medical expenses. Only for a prescribed basic list of what “you can have” healthcare items. Anything more than basic you will have to pay your own.

8. Your long-serving independent family doctor will have to join the system or will not be allowed to see you under the 1Care scheme. The robust, cost- effective independent clinics serving the country will be replaced by 1Care clinics.
9. You cannot pick your own doctor. 1Care will allocate a doctor to you.

10. If you want to see a doctor of your choice, you’ll need to pay for that from your own pocket. Your allocated doctor will decide when and which specialist you can see if the need arises (a process called gate-keeping).

11. The NHFA will pay GPs RM60 (present proposal) for each patient as consultation fees. It does not include medicine. Compare this with presently, for cough and cold visit, the GP would charge RM20-RM30 for consultation and medicine. With 1Care: consultation for GP visit is RM60 and this does not include medicine

12. You cannot see your doctor as and when you feel the need arises. There will be a rationing system in place as well. There will also be rationing for specialist care with the GP as the gate-keeper. Likewise if you wish to see the specialist of your choice or go to a hospital of your choice, unless referred by your allocated doctor, you will also have to pay out of your pocket.

13. Even if you only see the doctor once in a year, you will not get a refund from 1Care. Your medical costs are prepaid in advance irrespective of whether you become sick or not.
You are also expected to make an additional co-payment for your visit. This is to discourage you from seeing doctors too often.

14. You will be prescribed only medicines from a standardised list of not-the- original medicines in keeping with WHO List of essential Medications.. This will save cost for 1Care and maximise profit for the insurance companies. Insurance companies will have major say in the price and the range of this standardise medicine list. It will likely to be the cheapest medicine.

15. The doctor will only give you injections. You’ll need to get all other medicines from a pharmacist, even if it means hauling three sick children with high fever along a hot, dusty busy street looking for the nearest pharmacy.

16. If you do not like what is given to you, you can get alternative care by paying out of your own pocket.

The Big Picture

Each year, we all pay a total of RM44.24 billion a year for healthcare – now called National Healthcare Hospitals and clinics ( an integration of public hospitals and clinics, private hospitals and private GPs. which in essence is a privatisation of public and nationalisation of private healthcare facilities)
All this will now go under 1Care.
This means 1Care will get almost RM45 billion a year.
The administrative cost is likely to be 10% or about RM 4.5 billion

The poor

Who will then care for the poor and the marginalised population when the private and public healthcare corporatize and turned into independent commercial entities each competing with the other for business and profits?

Public hospitals and clinics are service-driven will become corporatize/privatise and have to be profit-driven
So who will serve the people in remote places?
Who will serve the very poor people?

Situations
What happens when the government introduces 1Care?

The whole system of independent one-stop GPs will be restructured and converted into 1Care clinics like the UK NHS general practitioner system.

Before:

Ali has always having skin rashes for many years. He has to see his doctor once a month to get treatment. That would mean he will have to see his doctor 12 times a year just for this illness. What if he has other illnesses?

Now:

But now, Ali’s doctor has allocated only a budget equivalent to six visits a year. Regardless of how many time Ali would need for his yearly treatment. What happens then? A rationing system will kick in. If the doctor sees Ali too many time, his “P4P” (Pay for Performance) profile will be poor and he will be paid less.

To start with, Ali will probably cannot just walk in and expect to be treated. He will have to make an appointment. There will be a long waiting list. What if Ali needs to be treated for fever or some painful joints? He will also have to wait for his appointment. If he cannot wait and wants immediate treatment from another doctor he will have to pay on his own. This is what the NHS UK system is offering its patients.

Lim has an appointment to see his doctor over a knee ache. Just before his appointment, he has an ingrown toe nail that has become painful. At the clinic, after his doctor treats him for his knee ache, he asks his doctor if he could look into his ingrown nail. His doctor says “No, the system does not allow me to do that. You must make another appointment. This visit I can only treat and bill for your knee ache. 1Care will accuse me of over-servicing my patients. I have no discretion here, all is by SOPs” This is what the NHS UK system is like today.

Mutu lives in a remote rubber estate. One day he had chest pain and went to the nearby 1Care clinic..He has blood pressure problems since young and has had fits. A hospital assistant saw him. Because of a change of his medications to the cheapest not-the-original medications, his blood pressure went out of control and his seizures returned. He developed a fatal stroke and died This is already what is happening when essential original medications are replaced with the cheapest .The cheapest medications is not necessarily the best for the patient and certainly not the safest.See More

I picked this from the Star today :http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/1/6/nation/10212570&sec=nation. A direct translation from Malay by our government agency!! What can I say? there goes our standard of English. Probably the person in charge used Google translator and did not check before publishing it on their website.

I wonder how they will translate “plug and play“………………………………………. better than “clothes that poke eyes“, I guess.

laughter is the best medicine, I thought politicians were already giving us jokes everyday………………..and now MINDEF?

 Whenever the salary scheme changes, issues like this will appear. The letter below appeared in the Sun yesterday http://www.thesundaily.my/news/257153. It will always benefit the juniors and the seniors will always lose out and forced to leave. When SSM was introduced in 2003, I was one of the casualty. I was gazetted 2 weeks after SSM was introduced and just because of that I did not get my promotion to U48. People who were gazetted just 2 weeks before me were given promotion. It took me another 4 years after much discussion between SCHOMOS, MOH and JPA for me to get my U48 promotion. By this time, even my juniors who were just gazetted in 2006 were also given U48!! So, in terms of salary, I was sitting at the same salary as my juniors of 4 years. That was one of the reason I quit civil service and joint Monash University then. 

As I had written before https://pagalavan.com/politics/government-doctors-promotion/, when the time based promotion was introduced in 2010, the same situation happened. The senior consultants were given U54 at the same time with junior specialist. Basically a consultant who has been in service for almost 15 years was sitting at the same salary as a junior specialist of 9 years of service. A consultant and his subspeciality trainee was at the same salary. Again, this chased away a lot of senior specialist from civil service.

Now, with the introduction of the new salary scheme for civil servants (SBPA), the same issue is happening again. The seniors who were in U54 will be at the same salary with junior specialist of U54. Everyone will be getting the same salary except for those who are in JUSA scale. There is a huge bottleneck at U54 that not many are going to be promoted to JUSA in near future. IT is really demoralising to be in their situation and I felt the same when I was stuck at U41 grade for almost 4 years after gazettement.

These are the many frustration that you will face in civil service. It only chases away all the good hardworking senior consultants, leaving behind the “world travellers” and apple polishers. Unfortunately, the private sector is also getting saturated with lower incomes. So, if you can’t beat them, join them lah…………

Senior medical specialist in distress

Posted on 4 January 2012 – 07:40pm
Last updated on 4 January 2012 – 08:19pm

I AM a senior specialist practising in one of the busiest hospitals in the country. I’m in my 10th year of service as a specialist and 19th year of service as a doctor.

The introduction of “Sistem Saraan Baru Perkhidmatan Awam” or SBPA has been unfair to me and other senior specialists and consultants who are stuck at maximum salary scale in the UD54 post.

First, based on the SBPA salary adjustment formula, I and many other senior specialists will see an increment of 3.9% from our previous scale of P1T8 (Sistem Saraan Malaysia) to UD1-6 T1 scale (SBPA scale).

However, a different formula is used for salary adjustment of junior specialists that does not make any sense.
Ironically, these junior specialists were automatically promoted in 2010 through a “time-based” promotion exercise. Junior specialists who are holding the UD54 post will be paid the same salary as senior specialists and consultants in SBPA.

Some of these junior specialists were my former house officers and medical officers when I was a specialist. As an example, a junior specialist who holds a UD54 post in my department draws a salary of RM5,465.42 (P1T2). After SBPA is implemented on Jan 1, his or her salary is increased by 30.1% to a scale of UD1-6 T1.

According to media reports and PSD, civil servants were supposed to enjoy an increase of 7-13% in pay rise but how do you explain the big jump for junior specialists? Isn’t this unfair to senior specialists and consultants? I understand that those in JUSA post will also enjoy a big increase in pay rise and thus, making us a breed that is easily dismissed, expendable and easily forgotten.

Today, with the introduction of SBPA, we will all be lumped together and thus, senior ones like me will lose our years of service. I do not know if anyone realises that we are the ones who perform the bulk of specialist work, train the junior specialists, train the medical officers, Masters candidates and house officers, involved in various ISO and accreditation activities and come up with ideas that benefit the department and hospitals in general.

We also perform activities that fulfil Key Performance Indexes (KPI) and make sure our services satisfy our customers. With the implementation of SBPA, it makes us feel as if, all our services are unappreciated.

I also noted that there has been no promotion exercise at all for us clinicians in 2011. Most senior specialists and consultants can’t imagine what is in store for them after looking at such unfair practices in salary adjustment. I believe that the lack of proper career development paths that we see in SBPA will compel more senior specialists to leave government service.

As a senior specialist, I have sacrificed my precious time to gain knowledge and skills and have continued to serve the Health Ministry diligently. I hope the higher authorities including the ministry will look into our plight and save whatever little dignity that is left of us.

Doctor
Shah Alam

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2011 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

London Olympic Stadium holds 80,000 people. This blog was viewed about 300,000 times in 2011. If it were competing at London Olympic Stadium, it would take about 4 sold-out events for that many people to see it.

Click here to see the complete report.

It has been almost 2 weeks since I last posted. It has been quite a busy 2 weeks with a lot of things to settle before the new year. Year 2011 has been a relatively good year for me, being my first full year in private practise. So far everything seem to be going on well.

Same can’t be said about the future of medical education and practise in Malaysia. The mushrooming of medical schools is a big screw-up. Unemployed  doctors are going to become a reality. The ministry has already started to give housemanship on contract basis indicating that the system is bursting. I can only say that the situation will get worst soon.

I had given enough advise to many budding doctors to decide on their fate. It is all up to them to analyse and decide on their future. Being a doctor is no more prestigious, money-making or easy life. The salary in government sector after the recent introduction of the new salary scheme (SBPA) is fairly good but getting a job in civil service is going to be the major problem in near future. On the other hand, the income of doctors in private sector is gradually dropping and unethical practises are increasing as a mode of survival. I will write more about this soon.

Well, whatever said, I hope 2012 will be a better year for everyone. I hope it will not turn out to be like the 2012 movie.

Happy New Year 2012 to everyone………………………

The letter below appeared in The Sun, 2 days ago: http://www.thesundaily.my/node/77369. I must say that the retiring public university Professor has said it right! I have been saying all theses since I started blogging. The entire medical education in this country is going down, that is the reality. Not only the undergraduate teaching standards is going down but also the postgraduate standards. I am seeing more and more Master’s graduates who are not competent as before. NO wonder our politicians are going overseas to seek treatment!

Again, God save this country! BTW, I don’t think Higher Education Ministry will be bothered. Education Hub mah……………

Urgent issues for Higher Education Ministry

Posted on 16 December 2011 – 05:06am

I WRITE in response to “Sub-standard housemen” (Nov 8) and “Continuous efforts to improve housemanship training” (Letters, Nov 16) as a professor at a public university in Malaysia offering medical courses.

I agree that deteriorating standards among housemen are partly due to their attitude. However, a large part of the blame lies with the Higher Education Ministry and public universities. Poor attitude had existed among medical students since the early days of medical education in Malaysia. Then, they were identified and given proper guidance while still at university so that they emerged responsible doctors, because medical education then was a sort of apprenticeship. These days, the sheer number of students and the lack of suitably qualified medical lecturers make individual attention virtually impossible and the learning experience diluted.

Teaching in public universities for more than 20 years has given me a firsthand perspective of the downward spiral of the standard of medical schools in Malaysia. Many fellow lecturers who are experts in their disciplines quit universities to establish their own practices. They were replaced by recently graduated and inexperienced doctors and foreign lecturers from countries like Myanmar, Indonesia and Pakistan. In the past, specialists from the Health Ministry (MOH) would join universities as lecturers while medical officers would join as trainee lecturers. In the last two years, even local doctors have stopped joining universities as lecturers or trainee lecturers.

There are a few reasons for this, the most important being the salary inequality between doctors working in MOH hospitals and those who are lecturers in public universities. This began in March 2009 when Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak announced a new career pathway with time-based promotion for MOH doctors, giving them an instant increase in salary. This caused a disparity of salaries between the two categories – most marked when comparing a doctor at the MOH (RM6,731.54) with a trainee lecturer at a public university (RM4,907.57), both of the same seniority.

Another reason is the lack of transparency in the promotion of medical lecturers. Some who have worked more than 10 years are still senior lecturers while some junior lecturers have been promoted to associate professors within five years. In contrast, all MOH doctors automatically get promoted after a number of years’ service.

To rub salt into the wound, foreign lecturers at public universities are paid more than locals and most are appointed as associated professors or professors despite being less qualified. Better qualified expatriate doctors would have been appointed as lecturers in countries like the UK, US or even Singapore. A majority of foreign doctors in our public universities are those who have been unsuccessful in their applications to these countries.

In his letter, the director-general of health said the Malaysian Medical Council has set the standard in the recognition of universities offering medical programmes. However, many universities still do not meet these standards. In a recent report by the Malaysian Qualifying Agency, the university at which I currently work failed to conform to these standards.

A lack of urgency by the Higher Education Ministry in addressing these issues will have dire consequences. The next generation of doctors will no longer be the professionals we once held in high esteem. They are going to be the ones caring for us in our old age and our lives will be in their hands.

Retiring Professor
via email

The entire Malaysian healthcare system will change soon. The Government started talking about National Healthcare Financing Scheme (NHFS) since the mid 1990s but due to various political reasons it was postponed many times. However, I feel the government will eventually introduce this change after the next general election. All plans are ready on paper, just waiting for the proper time for implementation. It is targeted to start in 2014 under the name of 1Care system. The letter below in Malaysiakini explains the impact of the scheme to the citizens.
 
The 1Care system will start by incorporating the GPs into primary health care system. It is a way for the government to reduce their load in government clinics. Now, before every one gets excited thinking that GPs are going to benefit, please check the system in more detail.
 
Every employed person will have to contribute to this scheme, similar like EPF. Certain percentage of your salary will be deducted monthly as a contribution to this NHFS. I heard government servants will be exempted but they can only seek treatment from government clinics/hospitals. I am sure you will know who will run this scheme, based on past experience of corporatization ! Basically, this scheme will allocate a certain amount of money for each private citizens of Malaysia. I was told that it would be in a range of about RM4K per year. Every citizen need to register with a GP and can only seek treatment from that particular GP whether they like it or not. If you decide to choose someone else, you need to pay on your own. Zoning will be implemented with only certain number of GPs will be included in each zone. GPs must sign a contract with NHFS to become a panel clinic. Each of these GPs will be allocated about 1500-2000 patients. GPs with Primary Care Diploma or Family Physicians Specialist will be given preference. Every GP will only be paid certain amount of fee for each of their consultation and the number of visits per year will be limited. Only certain medications listed as “standard drugs” under the scheme will be allowed to be prescribed and paid by the scheme as mentioned below ( so the GPs may lose the profits from meds). Once the citizen finishes his/her allocation, highly likely, they have to go back to the government clinic. However, I also heard that the GPs may be forced to provide free service for the remaining number of visits as part of social obligation to the community. I am not sure where and how the government clinics are going to be placed in this system.
 
Once the primary healthcare integration is complete under the NHFS, the government hospitals will be corporatised. For those who are new in MOH, the corporatisation of government hospitals were supposed to be implemented in 1998/1999. Most of the new hospitals like Selayang, Ampang, Sg Buloh, Sultan Ismail hospitals were supposed to be run by corporate bodies. Fortunately, due to the 1999 political crisis involving the sacking of Anwar Ibrahim etc, the entire plan was postponed. Soon, it will be revived under the 1Care system. Once corporatised, each hospitals will be an autonomous hospital. Each hospital will decide on how many doctors they will employ, how many housemen they will train and how many specialist they need. There are not obliged to provide job to everyone. All graduates will need to apply to the individual hospitals for a job. Incompetent ones may be kicked out. However, it is a long way to go before this happens as I was informed that the corporatisation of hospitals will only take place about 3-4 years after the primary care integration, if everything goes well. The entire restructuring exercise will take about 15 years from 2014. Once everything is complete, the NHFS will be paying for both public and private sectors(with certain limit), by which time both may become one system. The “semi-government” corporatised hospitals will still be subsidised heavily by the government. Personal insurance will be used to top up the payment for private hospitals once the NHFS limit is achieved.
 
At this point of time, no one knows what will be the final outcome of the implementation of this scheme. What I have written above is from MMA magazines and people who attended the technical workshop on 1Care system. Some facts can be obtained from http://www.mma.org.my/Portals/0/MMA.October%2010.vol.40.issue10%20Web.pdf and the subsequent MMA Magazines till Nov 2011. Whatever it is, young doctors can forget about earning big money as a doctor in the future. Life is not going to be easy and even getting a job is not going to be guaranteed.
 
This is another interesting write up which you may be interested: http://blog.limkitsiang.com/2011/05/18/1care-outpatient-scheme-middlemen-didahulukan/
 
With 1 Care, the choice will not be there
Dr Steven KW Chow
2:42PM Dec 13, 2011

The 1 Care health system transformation plan for Malaysia is now in the process of being sold to the public.

To our knowledge, the development of the blueprint is being fast-tracked and that the detailed plan to implement 1 Care will be ready as early as 2012.

Technical working groups are already hard at work on this. As the term technical working group implies, it is the technical details are being worked out – not the decision for plan for a new health system. Thus, we are way past the “still in planning process” (The Star, May 13, 2011).

We must address certain issues that are raised before implementation.

We are told that the new health system will be in the substance and form of the NHS of the UK. We strongly urge for a critical rethinking of this for the following reasons:

1. Existing Primary Care Provides Better Accessibility and Choice

The primary care model of the NHS has many failings. The picture from the NHS shows that it is not the proven mechanism to facilitate appropriate access to higher level of care. In the UK, this system requires patients to make appointments with the GP, even for acute conditions. As a result, the A&E Departments of hospitals are jammed with patients and waiting lists for cold cases to see the doctor or undergo surgery is long.

On the other hand, Malaysia has a better healthcare system. We had good KPIs reported in the latest National Health Accounts Report. Our health system has been praised in many international reviews and articles published in journals.

In Malaysia, government health facilities have a good system of referral and provide the safety net for the poor. Those who can afford to pay out-of-pocket consult private doctors. This is a good balance of those seeking private and public healthcare.

What the government really needs to do is protect those using private care from exorbitant charges and being over serviced. This can be handled by strict enforcement of the relevant provisions in the existing Private Healthcare Facilities and Services Act1998/Regulations 2006.

There is choice with the present system. With 1-Care this choice will not be there. The patient and public pay upfront in the form of insurance or taxes. If they do not want the doctors or the service that is allocated, they will have to pay again for what they choose.

2. 1 Care will cost more

Worldwide it is recognised that a system based on general taxation is the most efficient and equitable.

Experiences from many countries have shown that the rise of healthcare cost is higher when other forms of healthcare financing are introduced.

Instead of finding another method of financing, including social health insurance, to improve efficiency through provision of greater choice and better control on cost of health care delivery, the MOH should look internally on wastage and efficiency and improve the government system to be better than the private sector as shown by experiences in Singapore and Hong Kong where the public prefers the public system.

The 2002 Report of the Study on “ Healthcare Reform Initiatives in Malaysia” by three Health Ministry-appointed consultants led by Donald S Shepard have clearly diagnosed the important issues of healthcare delivery in Malaysia and proposed solutions.

Cost-wise, the consultants “calculated that in the year 2000, the average ambulatory consultation (public facility) outside of a specialised hospital (including average prescriptions and laboratory services associated with that visit) costs RM91, while the average inpatients stay cost RM1,091 (or RM286 per day).

In contrast, the fee for an amublatory visit, RM1, has not increased in years and covers only one percent of the economic cost of an average visit”. This does not include the economic cost of long waiting time and time off work.

We know that the average cost for a GP outpatient consultation including prescriptions would only be between RM30 to RM50. Waiting time is shorter. Thus it is clearly cheaper and more efficent to just outsource this ambulatory outpatients to the existing robust GP system thereby releasing the public system to concentrate on secondary and tertiary care. The recovery economic cost of a shorter waiting time will also benefit the patient and the community.

3. Transformation versus Evolution

The overall recommendation of this extensive study based on the diagnosis of our healthcare system was for the country to proceed with “limited reform”.

This reform “should improve the management of the public healthcare services so that they can provide better working conditions for their staff,fill critical vacancies,enhance responsiveness to population’s needs and wants, and maintain an equitable basis for financing healthcare services”.

4. Improving stakeholders’ feedback for 1-Care Consultation

The cost and implications of 1-Care affects all. Judging from the concerns expressed by many doctors and the public in the media, it is clear that those so called stakeholders that are invited for discussion are:

1. Either not real representative of the profession
2. Or the stakeholders are not providing feedback
3. Or the stakeholders are some favoured few

It will be good governance to inform the public who the stakeholders are (in name and organisation) to ensure that they are truly representative and to include more public representation like patient groups, consumers, employer representatives and more NGOs.

5. Corporatisation of Public Hospitals.

The 1 Care systems requires corporatisation of public hospitals – the establishment of administratively autonomous hospitals through devolution of authority from federal control, a variant of corporatisation ala IJN. This will be in line with the seamless integration of private and public healthcare facilities.

This is clearly not possible as private facilities are profit-driven as compare to public facilities which is socially-driven. Furthermore this is contradictory to that reassurance given by the health minister in 1998 that the government will not corporatise public hospitals.

At the end of the day one would create a huge profit-driven monster that will be impossible to control as the regulator (i.e. the government) will also be an operator of the industry via its GLCs.

DR STEVEN KW CHOW is president of the Federation of Private Medical Practitioners’ Associations Malaysia.