Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Education’ Category

This is what I call ” Foot in the Mouth” syndrome. The nurses issue made the headline today in the Star. I still remember about less than 10 years ago, the headline was ” Shortage of Nurses”. Then came the euphoria of private nursing colleges mushrooming in every corner of the country.

As usual our Health Minister does not seem to know what he is talking about. There are 2 group of nurses: the diploma holders and the post basic nurses. All nursing colleges including private and government funded only produce diploma holders and they are known as staff nurses!! Only after they complete their basic nursing board certification, they can apply for post basic training to become specialise nurses in maternity, cardiac, neuro, ICU etc. There is no such thing as specialised training at diploma level even before they can become staff nurses. ALL of them only undergo “general” training”.

So, in order for them to undergo specialise training, they need to get a job in the first place. So, what the hell is the MOH talking about. The short term knee jerk reaction will be to promote some nurses to higher level which is vacant and creat more vacancy at the lower level. Again, this will not be enough to absorb all, as the MOH nursing graduates themselves is more than enough to fill up this post at the moment.

And they are also blamming the private colleges now! I mean, who the hell in the first place approved all these coleges to produce such a large number of nurses, majority of substandard quality? The private colleges are here to make money/profit and not for some social service. This is a well known fact! The same situation is also happening to radiographers, physiotherapist, dispensers etc. Can MOH kindly look into this as well.

Gosh, probably 3-5 years from now, I will writing the same thing as above again, but for doctors!! At least the nurses have Nursing Board examination for quality control!

Mismatch between training and market needs for specialised nurses

PUTRAJAYA: The number of jobless nursing graduates has reached such a state that Health Minister Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai has ticked off private institutions of higher learning for not being in touch with market demand.

The institutions, he said, were the cause of the surplus as they have not delivered on the areas of expertise needed and thus created a mismatch between training and market needs.

Most of the private nursing colleges are offering mere “general training”, which did not cater to the private sector’s requirement for specialised nurses, he said.

Among the measures to rectify the problem:

> The Government to work on creating vacancies at public hospitals.

>The Malaysian Society for Healthcare Delivery wants a system to monitor the quality of nursing graduates.

Health Ministry to hire graduate nurses

By JOSEPH SIPALAN jsipalan@thestar.com.my

PUTRAJAYA: The Health Ministry is working on creating vacancies at government hospitals to absorb the large number of unemployed graduate nurses.

Health Minister Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai said a special committee, led by Health director-general Datuk Seri Dr Hasan Abdul Rahman, had been set up to find a solution to the issue.

“We are working on a programme to promote those who are already in the system and the vacancies can then be filled up by the graduates,” he said yesterday.

Liow pointed out that the proposed programme aimed to train the current crop of nurses to specialise in one of the many fields in government hospitals and in the process, create vacancies in lower-level positions.

In the long run, however, he said private institutions of higher learning would need to streamline their syllabus to match the demands of the local health industry.

Over the past week, The Star ran several reports highlighting the difficulty faced by nursing graduates from private institutes in finding jobs.

A government study found that over 54% of private nursing diploma graduates could not find work three to four months after graduating in 2010, compared to 21.7% in 2008.

Liow said the main factor leading to the surplus of nursing graduates was that private institutes appeared to not be in touch with the areas of expertise that were in demand.

He said the Government currently runs around 30 colleges, whose graduates are trained to meet the needs of public hospitals.

On the other hand, most of the estimated 70 private nursing colleges nationwide were providing general training and in many cases, did not meet private sector demand for specialised nurses.

“We are not looking at it as a surplus. We do need nurses, and so does the private sector because it is also expanding.

“This is mostly an issue of a mismatch between training and market demand. However, we do not control the numbers (of student intake) in private colleges.

“This is something we will have to work out with the Higher Education Ministry, and hopefully all of this (syllabus and market demand) will be streamlined,” he said.

Liow did not give a deadline for the committee to find a solution, saying that it had only just been formed and held its first meeting recently

System needed to monitor quality of nursing grads’

PETALING JAYA: A comprehensive system is needed to monitor the quality of nursing graduates and ensure they remain competent years after, a non-governmental organisation said.

Malaysian Society for Healthcare Delivery president Vimala Suppiah expressed worry that quality levels could be affected given the high number of nursing graduates being churned out at some private institutions.

“Nursing is a technical job. We do not know if they are getting proper practical work training.

“Staff nurses and matrons have complained of poor quality nursing graduates,” she said.

The number of private nursing diploma graduates, who took the Nursing Board examination, had increased from 4,025 in 2008 to 7,665 in 2010 but the passing percentage had decreased from 86.5% to 70.1% for the same period.

However, Health Ministry and public institution graduates had a passing percentage of between 94% and 99%.

The high number of private nursing graduates has resulted in many finding it difficult to get jobs, especially given the limited number of positions available in the private and government sector.

According to government statistics, a total of 37,702 students were enrolled in nursing diploma courses in 61 private institutions of higher learning (IPTS) in 2010.

As at December 2010, the total number of trained working nurses in the country stood at 61,110 with 21,118 working in the private sector.

A check with several IPTS showed that it was easy to enrol for a three-year nursing diploma programme even if the student did not have credits in all Science subjects.

Read Full Post »

Finally, one of the main stream newspaper has brought this issue to the public : http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/2/3/nation/10668315&sec=nation, http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/2/3/nation/10667498&sec=nation. But I am very sure nothing will happen. One of the reason why the government issued a moratorium of nursing colleges in 2010 is because they are well aware that they have put their foot into their mouth. They had approved too many nursing colleges without looking at the actual requirement. A knee jerk reaction in the name of shortage of nurses!! you can’t pull back the license that you had given.

The same will very soon happen to the doctors. I am still hearing a lot of people telling me that doctors will never become jobless. To be frank, there is nothing special about being a doctor. No government promises everyone a job! The government never asked you to become a doctor and thus you cannot blame the government. That’s the reason the government also issued a moratorium for medical schools last year but it is just too late! 36 medical schools for a population of 27 million with almost 40+ medical programmes ( some schools has up to 4 concurrent programmes). We should be in Guinness World Book of Records for having the highest number of medical schools per capita population and the country with the fastest growing medical schools in the world( 28 medical schools in 12 years)!! Malaysia boleh mah………….

The situation of medical graduates is more complicated than any other profession. If you do not get a post for housemanship, you will never be able to work as a doctor. Of course, not forgetting the amount of money that you spend to become a doctor and the fact that if you don’t get a job here, you can’t just apply to any other country as your degree is not recognised anywhere else, something peculiar to the field of medicine.

Jobs in nursing hard to come by for graduates

PETALING JAYA: It is difficult not only for diploma graduates but also degree-holders to get a job in nursing.

Some have ended up becoming insurance agents, tuition teachers and sales assistants while others are involved in part-time businesses as they wait for a nursing vacancy to open.

Hartini Haron, 25, from Sabah, said she graduated one-and-a-half years ago with a nursing degree from a public university but had yet to get a job in the field even though she had sent in “countless” applications.

“I am disappointed with the whole situation. We studied for four years and now, we can’t even get a job,” she said.

A few of her friends got a nursing job almost a year after completing their studies, said Hartini, who does whatever part-time work that she can get.

Hartini said new graduates with no working experience as a nurse found it tough competing with graduate nurses who had working experience.

Nurses from the Health Ministry who continued their studies for a degree were easily absorbed into the system, she added.

Another public university nursing graduate, Khairun Nisa Mohammad, 25, from Ampang said she received an offer from a private hospital after nine months of unemployment.

“The Government must provide job opportunities. If not, why did they provide nursing courses?” she asked, adding that only one of her course mates got a job as a lecturer with the Health Ministry.

Before getting her current job, Khairun Nisa said she worked as an assistant merchandiser.

“Some of my Chinese friends have become nurses in Singapore,” she said.

She said only two of her 30-odd classmates got jobs as nursing lecturers with the Health Ministry while the rest had not been able to get a nursing job and worked as sales assistants, insurance agents and tuition teachers.

Sofia Yusof, 25, who completed her nursing degree in July 2010, said she accepted a nursing job in March last year at a private hospital in Johor but was being paid according to the salary scale for diploma holders She added that she could not get a nursing job via the Public Services Commission.

“I have to support my parents who are old and pay for my study and car loans,” she said.

Another graduate who wanted to be known only as Nooraniza, 25, from Johor, said she had sent her applications to the commission, but there was no vacancy at the moment.

Desperate for a job, she accepted a nursing job at a private hospital which was only willing to pay a “diploma scheme” salary.

“I took up the job because I didn’t want to burden my father,” said Nooraniza, whose father is a crane driver.

S. Gnanapragasam, 62, said his 22-year-old daughter and several of his friends’ children were having difficulty getting nursing jobs after completing their diploma courses.

He added: “They spent several years studying and in the end, they are struggling to find jobs. My daughter finally found a job but she is not doing what she was trained to do.”

Nursing job woes cut deep

KUALA LUMPUR: Private nursing students are in a pickle with many struggling to find jobs after passing their exams.

According to a Government study, more than 54% of the private nursing diploma graduates could not find a job three to four months after graduating in 2010, compared to only 21.7% in 2008.

A total of 37,702 students were enrolled in nursing diploma courses in 61 private institutions of higher learning (IPTS) in 2010.

As of Dec 2010, the total number of trained working nurses in the country stood at 61,110, with 21,118 working in the private sector.

Parti Sosialis Malaysia central committee member Dr Michael Jeyakumar said the party had received many complaints from parents and graduates who could not find a job even after a few years.

He called for a freeze on the intake of new nursing students in private institutions until existing graduates secure jobs.

Jeyakumar said there were graduates who ended up working as receptionists or store clerks.

“With 37,500 students enrolled, we are looking at an average of 12,000 students graduating a year. The need for new nurses in the private sector is only about 1,500 a year, as only 5% to 10% of those working in the private sector will leave their existing jobs.

“It is also not easy for private graduates to get a job in the Government as only 438 IPTS nursing diploma graduates served with the Health Ministry in 2010,” he said at a press conference yesterday.

On average, a three-year nursing diploma programme at an IPTS would cost about RM50,000. Most IPTS offer full PTPTN loans to their nursing students.

Dr Jeyakumar called on the Government to absorb the loans for those who could not find jobs within a year of passing their Nursing Board exams.

He added that private institutions, whose students had low pass rates in the Nursing Board exams, should not be allowed to offer medical courses.

Government statistics showed that the number of graduates who took the Nursing Board examinations had increased from 4,025 in 2008 to 7,665 in 2010.

However, the pass percentage had fallen from 86.5% to 70.1% during the same period. Those studying in public institutions of higher learning had a pass rate of between 94% and 99%.

Higher Education Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin had announced a moratorium on new nursing schools in 2010.

Read Full Post »

Didn’t I say this almost 2 years ago? https://pagalavan.com/2010/04/27/no-more-nursing-schools-from-july/. The government stopped new nursing colleges from July 2010 onwards but this was what I said then:

 “It is good that the government is going to stop new nursing colleges but will this solve the problem? The existing nursing colleges itself are producing thousands of nurses of doubtful quality and they will keep producing them to get profit. So the number of new nurses will continue to be produced by these colleges, or may even increase! Even now, there are fresh nurses who are unable to find a job as the government service seem to be saturated with them.”

This was 2 years ago and now, the article below written by Dr Jeyakumar clearly illustrates the current situation. I predicted this to happen and it is happening. The number of application for nursing job in my hospital is piling up day by day. Many of them are totally below par in quality and not even employable. I was made to understand that you just need 1 credit in SPM to be eligible to do nursing!! You don’t need to pay anything as the college will apply for PTPTN loan for you. And woolah, you will do the course for free and become unemployed later. Who cares about job prospects as the college has already made the money.

The same situation is also happening for radiographers, physiotherapist and pharmacy dispensers. All these private colleges are recruiting students into this courses by giving false information that there is severe shortage. Obviously the Ministry of Higher Education is sleeping or not bothered at all as we are “education hub” , mah…………

What’s next? Unemployed doctors……………………… the same scenario is already happening for medicine and thus the “so-called” moratorium of medical schools last year. BUT every medical college ( 36 of them) seem to be increasing the number of intake year by year, even introducing newer twining programmes. Housemanship is now given on contract basis and I can see some shocking news waiting for them when they finish housemanship in 2 years time.

Thousands of private college nursing grads jobless — Jeyakumar Devaraj

January 14, 2012

JAN 14 — The Higher Education Ministry’s failure to control the greed of private nursing colleges has established a situation in which thousands of their graduates are jobless. And yet, these graduates are burdened with PTPTN loans of as much as RM50,000 to RM60,000.

Here are the facts:

● 61 private institutions have been given the go-ahead by the Higher Education Ministry to conduct nursing courses;

● there are currently more than 37,500 nursing undergraduates enrolled in these 61 private learning institutions. A large percentage of these undergraduates have acquired the PTPTN loan, normally around RM55,000;

● the total amount of staff nurses employed throughout the country as of December 2010 was 61,110. Of that total, 47,992 were stationed in the government sector and the remainder 21,118 in the private sector;

● in 2010, 7,665 nursing graduates from private institutions sat for the Nursing Board examination. Only 70.1 per cent of them passed the examination compared to the passing rate of 98.4 per cent amongst graduates from Health Ministry colleges.

● Only 42.7 per cent of nursing graduates from private higher education institutions in 2010 succeeded in acquiring jobs at hospitals and clinics

Taking all these facts into account, we wish to know the following:

● Is it the Higher Education Ministry that determines the intake quotas for nursing courses in private educational institutions in Malaysia? If so, what is the rationale for allowing an intake quota of 9,000 undergraduates for the year 2011?

● Is the minister aware that every trained nurse must renew his or her professional licence (APC — Annual Practising Certificate) every year? One of the terms that is required to acquire the APC is an occupational status as a nurse in a hospital. Therefore, if one is unable to get employed as a nurse, he or she is not eligible to renew his or her APC.

● Is the minister aware that the marketability of a staff nurse will be adversely affected if she is unable to get a nursing post in a hospital? This is due to the fact that a nurse’s skills will deteriorate if the graduate is not given a chance to practise as a nurse.

● Is the minister aware that a lot of the graduates at nursing private higher education institutions originate from families that are not rich? They are hoping to get a job as a nurse in order to pay back their PTPTN loans and to aid their respective families.

● Is the minister aware that repayment of the PTPTN loan is required even if the graduate is unable to acquire a job as a nurse?

● How many of the 61 private higher education institutions currently offering nursing courses have started or are applying to start medicine courses to train doctors?

Our demands:

● Freeze the intake of new students into private nursing colleges. The market is flooded at this point in time. Do not burden more young girls with PTPTN loans that they will not be able to pay back.

● Look into the other courses that are offered by the private colleges such as physiotherapy, health care, laboratory assistants, and radiology. If there exists a similar situation of over-supply for these other courses as well, please freeze the intake of new students into these courses.

● Reject applications of private higher education institutions to conduct medicine courses if the passing rate in the Nursing Board examination was below 90 per cent for graduates from those institutions in 2010 or 2009.

● Take over the PTPTN debts for all nurse graduates who have not acquired a nursing post in hospitals despite passing the Nursing Board’s examination.

● Conduct an investigation to determine why the market for trained nurses is flooded — 37,500 will graduate in three years, whereas the need for nurses is only 1,500 per year (more or less five per cent of the total currently employed in the private sector). Is this because of poor judgment on the part of officials who determine the quota or is corruption involved? The profits of private higher education institutions are immense!

● Review the validity of the policy of relying on private companies to provide higher education for our younger generation. It is evidently clear from the actions of the private nursing colleges that maximising profits is their main focus! The existence of PTPTN loans has underwritten the income of these private higher education institutions, and they are currently competing to attract as many students as possible without a care as to whether they can provide adequate practical exposure to their students or whether there are sufficient job opportunities for their graduates.

We hope that the Higher Education Ministry officials will study the issues that we have brought up and fix a date within a month’s time to inform us of the steps that will be taken by the ministry to manage the identified problems in this memorandum. — aliran.com

* The above article is a memorandum submitted by Dr Jeyakumar Devaraj to the Higher Education Minister on December 13, 2011 expressing concern about the high number of unemployed nursing graduates.

* Dr Jeyakumar Devaraj is the member of Parliament for Sungai Siput.

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication. The Malaysian Insider does not endorse the view unless specified.

Read Full Post »

A government doctor/specialist is being charged in court for molesting a patient: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/1/12/courts/10244849&sec=courts. Will the government provide the fund? I don’t think so and I am pretty sure that this doctor do not have any indemnity insurance to cover for himself (being a civil servant). BTW this will be a criminal charge and not a medical negligence.

As I have said before, litigation rate is going up everywhere especially in Klang Valley and cases like this are going to increase day by day. As doctors, we should be very careful with what we do. Make sure that we have a chaperone every time in our room or while you are examining a female patient. I am not sure what actually happened in the case below but I presume that he did a pelvic examination on this pregnant patient without first informing the patient and without a chaperone. If they have charged him in court means that the police has found enough evidence.

The government has already advised all government doctors to take their own medical indemnity insurance. It may be made compulsory soon. I will also advise female doctors to have a chaperone when examining a male patient. Vice versa can also happen !!

Doc charged with molesting pregnant patient

KUALA LUMPUR: An obstetrician has been charged at a magistrate’s court here with molesting his pregnant patient.

Dr Mohd Suhaidin Che Ngah, 36, claimed trial to using criminal force to outrage the modesty of a 27-year-old woman by touching her private parts at Hospital Sungai Buloh at 2.15pm on Nov 11 last year.

He seemed unfazed when the charges were read, even smiling throughout the hearing.

The offence, under Section 354 of the Penal Code, carries a maximum 10 years’ jail term or a fine or whipping, or any two such punishments, upon conviction.

DPP Nur Hidayah Raihan Md Nasir proposed bail at RM7,000.

However, Dr Mohd Suhaidin’s brother, who was his surety, sought a lower sum.

Magistrate Namirah Hanum Mohamad Albaki set bail at RM5,500 with one surety and fixed March 26 for mention.

Read Full Post »

Will this situation appear in Malaysia soon? I am afraid the time will come. In fact it has already started to happen. I am beginning to see doctors closing shop and jumping from one hospital to another for survival. With the glut that is coming, the situation will only get worst. This article appeared in CNNMoney  and below this I have attached some info regarding 1Care system.

Small Business: Doctors going broke
By Parija Kavilanz | CNNMoney.com – Thu, Jan 5, 2012 12:37 PM EST 

Doctors in America are harboring an embarrassing secret: Many of them are going broke.

This quiet reality, which is spreading nationwide, is claiming a wide range of casualties, including family physicians, cardiologists and oncologists.

Industry watchers say the trend is worrisome. Half of all doctors in the nation operate a private practice. So if a cash crunch forces the death of an independent practice, it robs a community of a vital health care resource.

“A lot of independent practices are starting to see serious financial issues,” said Marc Lion, CEO of Lion & Company CPAs, LLC, which advises independent doctor practices about their finances.

Doctors list shrinking insurance reimbursements, changing regulations, rising business and drug costs among the factors preventing them from keeping their practices afloat. But some experts counter that doctors’ lack of business acumen is also to blame.

Loans to make payroll: Dr. William Pentz, 47, a cardiologist with a Philadelphia private practice, and his partners had to tap into their personal assets to make payroll for employees last year. “And we still barely made payroll last paycheck,” he said. “Many of us are also skimping on our own pay.”

Pentz said recent steep 35% to 40% cuts in Medicare reimbursements for key cardiovascular services, such as stress tests and echocardiograms, have taken a substantial toll on revenue. “Our total revenue was down about 9% last year compared to 2010,” he said.

“These cuts have destabilized private cardiology practices,” he said. “A third of our patients are on Medicare. So these Medicare cuts are by far the biggest factor. Private insurers follow Medicare rates. So those reimbursements are going down as well.”

12 entrepreneurs reinventing health care

Pentz is thinking about an out. “If this continues, I might seriously consider leaving medicine,” he said. “I can’t keep working this way.”

Also on his mind, the impending 27.4% Medicare pay cut for doctors. “If that goes through, it will put us under,” he said.

Federal law requires that Medicare reimbursement rates be adjusted annually based on a formula tied to the health of the economy. That law says rates should be cut every year to keep Medicare financially sound.

Although Congress has blocked those cuts from happening 13 times over the past decade, most recently on Dec. 23 with a two-month temporary “patch,” this dilemma continues to haunt doctors every year.

Beau Donegan, senior executive with a hospital cancer center in Newport Beach, Calif., is well aware of physicians’ financial woes.

“Many are too proud to admit that they are on the verge of bankruptcy,” she said. “These physicians see no way out of the downward spiral of reimbursement, escalating costs of treating patients and insurance companies deciding when and how much they will pay them.”

Donegan knows an oncologist “with a stellar reputation in the community” who hasn’t taken a salary from his private practice in over a year.  He owes drug companies $1.6 million, which he wasn’t reimbursed for.

Dr. Neil Barth is that oncologist. He has been in the top 10% of oncologists in his region, according to U.S. News Top Doctors’ ranking. Still, he is contemplating personal bankruptcy.

That move could shutter his 31-year-old clinical practice and force 6,000 cancer patients to look for a new doctor.

Changes in drug reimbursements have hurt him badly. Until the mid-2000’s, drugs sales were big profit generators for oncologists.

In oncology, doctors were allowed to profit from drug sales. So doctors would buy expensive cancer drugs at bulk prices from drugmakers and then sell them at much higher prices to their patients.

“I grew up in that system. I was spending $1.5 million a month on buying treatment drugs,” he said. In 2005, Medicare revised the reimbursement guidelines for cancer drugs, which effectively made reimbursements for many expensive cancer drugs fall to less than the actual cost of the drugs.

“Our reimbursements plummeted,” Barth said.

Still, Barth continued to push ahead with innovative research, treating patients with cutting-edge expensive therapies, accepting patients who were underinsured only to realize later that insurers would not pay him back for much of his care.

“I was $3.2 million in debt by mid 2010,” said Barth. “It was a sickening feeling. I could no longer care for patients with catastrophic illnesses without scrutinizing every penny first.”

He’s since halved his debt and taken on a second job as a consultant to hospitals. But he’s still struggling and considering closing his practice in the next six months.

“The economics of providing health care in this country need to change. It’s too expensive for doctors,” he said. “I love medicine. I will find a way to refinance my debt and not lose my home or my practice.”

If he does declare bankruptcy, he loses all of it and has to find a way to start over at 60. Until then, he’s turning away new patients whose care he can no longer subsidize.

“I recently got a call from a divorced woman with two kids who is unemployed, house in foreclosure with advanced breast cancer,” he said. “The moment has come to this that you now say, ‘sorry, we don’t have the capacity to care for you.’ ”

Small business 101: A private practice is like a small business. “The only thing different is that a third party, and not the customer, is paying for the service,” said Lion.

“Many times I shake my head,” he said. “Doctors are trained in medicine but not how to run a business.” His biggest challenge is getting doctors to realize where and how their profits are leaking.

“On average, there’s a 10% to 15% profit leak in a private practice,” he said. Much of that is tied to money owed to the practice by patients or insurers. “This is also why they are seeing a cash crunch.”

My biggest tax nightmare!

Dr. Mike Gorman, a family physician in Loganvale, Nev., recently took out an SBA loan to keep his practice running and pay his five employees.

“It is embarrassing,” he said. “Doctors don’t want to talk about being in debt.” But he’s planning a new strategy  to deal with his rising business expenses and falling reimbursements.

“I will see more patients, but I won’t check all of their complaints at one time,” he explained. “If I do, insurance will bundle my reimbursement into one payment.”   Patients will have to make repeat visits — an arrangement that he acknowledges is “inconvenient.”

“This system pits doctor against patient,” he said. “But it’s the only way to beat the system and get paid.”

— Are you a doctor who has made financial decisions you came to regret? E-mail Parija Kavilanzand you could be part of an upcoming article. Click here for CNNMoney.com comment policy.

 
Salient points – 1Care

1. The government plans to introduce a new healthcare system called 1-Care. It includes an insurance system to fund for healthcare.

2. The National Healthcare Financing Authority will be in charge of 1Care – and …it is likely to be turned into a GLC.

3. Based on available information, every household will be made to pay up to 9.4% of gross household income for social health insurance. The payers will be the individual, the employer and the government via taxes, exact proportion still being worked out)

4. There shall be no choice. Everyone has to pay. There is no opting out. We have to pay upfront. It will no longer be fee-for-service; it is fee-before- service.

5. There has been no information on exactly how this payment will have to be made or how the government will collect from self-employed people.

6. The government will be expected to contribute to the insurance premiums of government pensioners, civil servants and five dependants.

7. But the problem is: 1Care does not cover all your medical expenses. Only for a prescribed basic list of what “you can have” healthcare items. Anything more than basic you will have to pay your own.

8. Your long-serving independent family doctor will have to join the system or will not be allowed to see you under the 1Care scheme. The robust, cost- effective independent clinics serving the country will be replaced by 1Care clinics.
9. You cannot pick your own doctor. 1Care will allocate a doctor to you.

10. If you want to see a doctor of your choice, you’ll need to pay for that from your own pocket. Your allocated doctor will decide when and which specialist you can see if the need arises (a process called gate-keeping).

11. The NHFA will pay GPs RM60 (present proposal) for each patient as consultation fees. It does not include medicine. Compare this with presently, for cough and cold visit, the GP would charge RM20-RM30 for consultation and medicine. With 1Care: consultation for GP visit is RM60 and this does not include medicine

12. You cannot see your doctor as and when you feel the need arises. There will be a rationing system in place as well. There will also be rationing for specialist care with the GP as the gate-keeper. Likewise if you wish to see the specialist of your choice or go to a hospital of your choice, unless referred by your allocated doctor, you will also have to pay out of your pocket.

13. Even if you only see the doctor once in a year, you will not get a refund from 1Care. Your medical costs are prepaid in advance irrespective of whether you become sick or not.
You are also expected to make an additional co-payment for your visit. This is to discourage you from seeing doctors too often.

14. You will be prescribed only medicines from a standardised list of not-the- original medicines in keeping with WHO List of essential Medications.. This will save cost for 1Care and maximise profit for the insurance companies. Insurance companies will have major say in the price and the range of this standardise medicine list. It will likely to be the cheapest medicine.

15. The doctor will only give you injections. You’ll need to get all other medicines from a pharmacist, even if it means hauling three sick children with high fever along a hot, dusty busy street looking for the nearest pharmacy.

16. If you do not like what is given to you, you can get alternative care by paying out of your own pocket.

The Big Picture

Each year, we all pay a total of RM44.24 billion a year for healthcare – now called National Healthcare Hospitals and clinics ( an integration of public hospitals and clinics, private hospitals and private GPs. which in essence is a privatisation of public and nationalisation of private healthcare facilities)
All this will now go under 1Care.
This means 1Care will get almost RM45 billion a year.
The administrative cost is likely to be 10% or about RM 4.5 billion

The poor

Who will then care for the poor and the marginalised population when the private and public healthcare corporatize and turned into independent commercial entities each competing with the other for business and profits?

Public hospitals and clinics are service-driven will become corporatize/privatise and have to be profit-driven
So who will serve the people in remote places?
Who will serve the very poor people?

Situations
What happens when the government introduces 1Care?

The whole system of independent one-stop GPs will be restructured and converted into 1Care clinics like the UK NHS general practitioner system.

Before:

Ali has always having skin rashes for many years. He has to see his doctor once a month to get treatment. That would mean he will have to see his doctor 12 times a year just for this illness. What if he has other illnesses?

Now:

But now, Ali’s doctor has allocated only a budget equivalent to six visits a year. Regardless of how many time Ali would need for his yearly treatment. What happens then? A rationing system will kick in. If the doctor sees Ali too many time, his “P4P” (Pay for Performance) profile will be poor and he will be paid less.

To start with, Ali will probably cannot just walk in and expect to be treated. He will have to make an appointment. There will be a long waiting list. What if Ali needs to be treated for fever or some painful joints? He will also have to wait for his appointment. If he cannot wait and wants immediate treatment from another doctor he will have to pay on his own. This is what the NHS UK system is offering its patients.

Lim has an appointment to see his doctor over a knee ache. Just before his appointment, he has an ingrown toe nail that has become painful. At the clinic, after his doctor treats him for his knee ache, he asks his doctor if he could look into his ingrown nail. His doctor says “No, the system does not allow me to do that. You must make another appointment. This visit I can only treat and bill for your knee ache. 1Care will accuse me of over-servicing my patients. I have no discretion here, all is by SOPs” This is what the NHS UK system is like today.

Mutu lives in a remote rubber estate. One day he had chest pain and went to the nearby 1Care clinic..He has blood pressure problems since young and has had fits. A hospital assistant saw him. Because of a change of his medications to the cheapest not-the-original medications, his blood pressure went out of control and his seizures returned. He developed a fatal stroke and died This is already what is happening when essential original medications are replaced with the cheapest .The cheapest medications is not necessarily the best for the patient and certainly not the safest.See More

Read Full Post »

I picked this from the Star today :http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/1/6/nation/10212570&sec=nation. A direct translation from Malay by our government agency!! What can I say? there goes our standard of English. Probably the person in charge used Google translator and did not check before publishing it on their website.

I wonder how they will translate “plug and play“………………………………………. better than “clothes that poke eyes“, I guess.

laughter is the best medicine, I thought politicians were already giving us jokes everyday………………..and now MINDEF?

Read Full Post »

The letter below appeared in The Sun, 2 days ago: http://www.thesundaily.my/node/77369. I must say that the retiring public university Professor has said it right! I have been saying all theses since I started blogging. The entire medical education in this country is going down, that is the reality. Not only the undergraduate teaching standards is going down but also the postgraduate standards. I am seeing more and more Master’s graduates who are not competent as before. NO wonder our politicians are going overseas to seek treatment!

Again, God save this country! BTW, I don’t think Higher Education Ministry will be bothered. Education Hub mah……………

Urgent issues for Higher Education Ministry

Posted on 16 December 2011 – 05:06am

I WRITE in response to “Sub-standard housemen” (Nov 8) and “Continuous efforts to improve housemanship training” (Letters, Nov 16) as a professor at a public university in Malaysia offering medical courses.

I agree that deteriorating standards among housemen are partly due to their attitude. However, a large part of the blame lies with the Higher Education Ministry and public universities. Poor attitude had existed among medical students since the early days of medical education in Malaysia. Then, they were identified and given proper guidance while still at university so that they emerged responsible doctors, because medical education then was a sort of apprenticeship. These days, the sheer number of students and the lack of suitably qualified medical lecturers make individual attention virtually impossible and the learning experience diluted.

Teaching in public universities for more than 20 years has given me a firsthand perspective of the downward spiral of the standard of medical schools in Malaysia. Many fellow lecturers who are experts in their disciplines quit universities to establish their own practices. They were replaced by recently graduated and inexperienced doctors and foreign lecturers from countries like Myanmar, Indonesia and Pakistan. In the past, specialists from the Health Ministry (MOH) would join universities as lecturers while medical officers would join as trainee lecturers. In the last two years, even local doctors have stopped joining universities as lecturers or trainee lecturers.

There are a few reasons for this, the most important being the salary inequality between doctors working in MOH hospitals and those who are lecturers in public universities. This began in March 2009 when Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak announced a new career pathway with time-based promotion for MOH doctors, giving them an instant increase in salary. This caused a disparity of salaries between the two categories – most marked when comparing a doctor at the MOH (RM6,731.54) with a trainee lecturer at a public university (RM4,907.57), both of the same seniority.

Another reason is the lack of transparency in the promotion of medical lecturers. Some who have worked more than 10 years are still senior lecturers while some junior lecturers have been promoted to associate professors within five years. In contrast, all MOH doctors automatically get promoted after a number of years’ service.

To rub salt into the wound, foreign lecturers at public universities are paid more than locals and most are appointed as associated professors or professors despite being less qualified. Better qualified expatriate doctors would have been appointed as lecturers in countries like the UK, US or even Singapore. A majority of foreign doctors in our public universities are those who have been unsuccessful in their applications to these countries.

In his letter, the director-general of health said the Malaysian Medical Council has set the standard in the recognition of universities offering medical programmes. However, many universities still do not meet these standards. In a recent report by the Malaysian Qualifying Agency, the university at which I currently work failed to conform to these standards.

A lack of urgency by the Higher Education Ministry in addressing these issues will have dire consequences. The next generation of doctors will no longer be the professionals we once held in high esteem. They are going to be the ones caring for us in our old age and our lives will be in their hands.

Retiring Professor
via email

Read Full Post »

The entire Malaysian healthcare system will change soon. The Government started talking about National Healthcare Financing Scheme (NHFS) since the mid 1990s but due to various political reasons it was postponed many times. However, I feel the government will eventually introduce this change after the next general election. All plans are ready on paper, just waiting for the proper time for implementation. It is targeted to start in 2014 under the name of 1Care system. The letter below in Malaysiakini explains the impact of the scheme to the citizens.
 
The 1Care system will start by incorporating the GPs into primary health care system. It is a way for the government to reduce their load in government clinics. Now, before every one gets excited thinking that GPs are going to benefit, please check the system in more detail.
 
Every employed person will have to contribute to this scheme, similar like EPF. Certain percentage of your salary will be deducted monthly as a contribution to this NHFS. I heard government servants will be exempted but they can only seek treatment from government clinics/hospitals. I am sure you will know who will run this scheme, based on past experience of corporatization ! Basically, this scheme will allocate a certain amount of money for each private citizens of Malaysia. I was told that it would be in a range of about RM4K per year. Every citizen need to register with a GP and can only seek treatment from that particular GP whether they like it or not. If you decide to choose someone else, you need to pay on your own. Zoning will be implemented with only certain number of GPs will be included in each zone. GPs must sign a contract with NHFS to become a panel clinic. Each of these GPs will be allocated about 1500-2000 patients. GPs with Primary Care Diploma or Family Physicians Specialist will be given preference. Every GP will only be paid certain amount of fee for each of their consultation and the number of visits per year will be limited. Only certain medications listed as “standard drugs” under the scheme will be allowed to be prescribed and paid by the scheme as mentioned below ( so the GPs may lose the profits from meds). Once the citizen finishes his/her allocation, highly likely, they have to go back to the government clinic. However, I also heard that the GPs may be forced to provide free service for the remaining number of visits as part of social obligation to the community. I am not sure where and how the government clinics are going to be placed in this system.
 
Once the primary healthcare integration is complete under the NHFS, the government hospitals will be corporatised. For those who are new in MOH, the corporatisation of government hospitals were supposed to be implemented in 1998/1999. Most of the new hospitals like Selayang, Ampang, Sg Buloh, Sultan Ismail hospitals were supposed to be run by corporate bodies. Fortunately, due to the 1999 political crisis involving the sacking of Anwar Ibrahim etc, the entire plan was postponed. Soon, it will be revived under the 1Care system. Once corporatised, each hospitals will be an autonomous hospital. Each hospital will decide on how many doctors they will employ, how many housemen they will train and how many specialist they need. There are not obliged to provide job to everyone. All graduates will need to apply to the individual hospitals for a job. Incompetent ones may be kicked out. However, it is a long way to go before this happens as I was informed that the corporatisation of hospitals will only take place about 3-4 years after the primary care integration, if everything goes well. The entire restructuring exercise will take about 15 years from 2014. Once everything is complete, the NHFS will be paying for both public and private sectors(with certain limit), by which time both may become one system. The “semi-government” corporatised hospitals will still be subsidised heavily by the government. Personal insurance will be used to top up the payment for private hospitals once the NHFS limit is achieved.
 
At this point of time, no one knows what will be the final outcome of the implementation of this scheme. What I have written above is from MMA magazines and people who attended the technical workshop on 1Care system. Some facts can be obtained from http://www.mma.org.my/Portals/0/MMA.October%2010.vol.40.issue10%20Web.pdf and the subsequent MMA Magazines till Nov 2011. Whatever it is, young doctors can forget about earning big money as a doctor in the future. Life is not going to be easy and even getting a job is not going to be guaranteed.
 
This is another interesting write up which you may be interested: http://blog.limkitsiang.com/2011/05/18/1care-outpatient-scheme-middlemen-didahulukan/
 
With 1 Care, the choice will not be there
Dr Steven KW Chow
2:42PM Dec 13, 2011

The 1 Care health system transformation plan for Malaysia is now in the process of being sold to the public.

To our knowledge, the development of the blueprint is being fast-tracked and that the detailed plan to implement 1 Care will be ready as early as 2012.

Technical working groups are already hard at work on this. As the term technical working group implies, it is the technical details are being worked out – not the decision for plan for a new health system. Thus, we are way past the “still in planning process” (The Star, May 13, 2011).

We must address certain issues that are raised before implementation.

We are told that the new health system will be in the substance and form of the NHS of the UK. We strongly urge for a critical rethinking of this for the following reasons:

1. Existing Primary Care Provides Better Accessibility and Choice

The primary care model of the NHS has many failings. The picture from the NHS shows that it is not the proven mechanism to facilitate appropriate access to higher level of care. In the UK, this system requires patients to make appointments with the GP, even for acute conditions. As a result, the A&E Departments of hospitals are jammed with patients and waiting lists for cold cases to see the doctor or undergo surgery is long.

On the other hand, Malaysia has a better healthcare system. We had good KPIs reported in the latest National Health Accounts Report. Our health system has been praised in many international reviews and articles published in journals.

In Malaysia, government health facilities have a good system of referral and provide the safety net for the poor. Those who can afford to pay out-of-pocket consult private doctors. This is a good balance of those seeking private and public healthcare.

What the government really needs to do is protect those using private care from exorbitant charges and being over serviced. This can be handled by strict enforcement of the relevant provisions in the existing Private Healthcare Facilities and Services Act1998/Regulations 2006.

There is choice with the present system. With 1-Care this choice will not be there. The patient and public pay upfront in the form of insurance or taxes. If they do not want the doctors or the service that is allocated, they will have to pay again for what they choose.

2. 1 Care will cost more

Worldwide it is recognised that a system based on general taxation is the most efficient and equitable.

Experiences from many countries have shown that the rise of healthcare cost is higher when other forms of healthcare financing are introduced.

Instead of finding another method of financing, including social health insurance, to improve efficiency through provision of greater choice and better control on cost of health care delivery, the MOH should look internally on wastage and efficiency and improve the government system to be better than the private sector as shown by experiences in Singapore and Hong Kong where the public prefers the public system.

The 2002 Report of the Study on “ Healthcare Reform Initiatives in Malaysia” by three Health Ministry-appointed consultants led by Donald S Shepard have clearly diagnosed the important issues of healthcare delivery in Malaysia and proposed solutions.

Cost-wise, the consultants “calculated that in the year 2000, the average ambulatory consultation (public facility) outside of a specialised hospital (including average prescriptions and laboratory services associated with that visit) costs RM91, while the average inpatients stay cost RM1,091 (or RM286 per day).

In contrast, the fee for an amublatory visit, RM1, has not increased in years and covers only one percent of the economic cost of an average visit”. This does not include the economic cost of long waiting time and time off work.

We know that the average cost for a GP outpatient consultation including prescriptions would only be between RM30 to RM50. Waiting time is shorter. Thus it is clearly cheaper and more efficent to just outsource this ambulatory outpatients to the existing robust GP system thereby releasing the public system to concentrate on secondary and tertiary care. The recovery economic cost of a shorter waiting time will also benefit the patient and the community.

3. Transformation versus Evolution

The overall recommendation of this extensive study based on the diagnosis of our healthcare system was for the country to proceed with “limited reform”.

This reform “should improve the management of the public healthcare services so that they can provide better working conditions for their staff,fill critical vacancies,enhance responsiveness to population’s needs and wants, and maintain an equitable basis for financing healthcare services”.

4. Improving stakeholders’ feedback for 1-Care Consultation

The cost and implications of 1-Care affects all. Judging from the concerns expressed by many doctors and the public in the media, it is clear that those so called stakeholders that are invited for discussion are:

1. Either not real representative of the profession
2. Or the stakeholders are not providing feedback
3. Or the stakeholders are some favoured few

It will be good governance to inform the public who the stakeholders are (in name and organisation) to ensure that they are truly representative and to include more public representation like patient groups, consumers, employer representatives and more NGOs.

5. Corporatisation of Public Hospitals.

The 1 Care systems requires corporatisation of public hospitals – the establishment of administratively autonomous hospitals through devolution of authority from federal control, a variant of corporatisation ala IJN. This will be in line with the seamless integration of private and public healthcare facilities.

This is clearly not possible as private facilities are profit-driven as compare to public facilities which is socially-driven. Furthermore this is contradictory to that reassurance given by the health minister in 1998 that the government will not corporatise public hospitals.

At the end of the day one would create a huge profit-driven monster that will be impossible to control as the regulator (i.e. the government) will also be an operator of the industry via its GLCs.

DR STEVEN KW CHOW is president of the Federation of Private Medical Practitioners’ Associations Malaysia.


Read Full Post »

I read the news below in today’s Star and I began to wonder whether this will be the fate of our doctors in the future. I was informed that MOH has already started to give contracts for housemanship. This basically means that after 2 years of housemanship, there is no guarantee that the contract will be renewed for MO. This puts you equivalent to a temporary teacher under contract and the same problems will occur. Most likely, the contract will only be renewed on you accepting where you are going to be posted, as the number of post is going to be very much limited. E.g: if MOH asked you to go to Limbang, Sarawak as a MO and you refuse, MOH will not renew your contract which basically means you are jobless! You also need to apply for a job in government sector after housemanship.Of course, government sponsored students will be given priority.

As David Quek mentioned in his speech (http://myhealth-matters.blogspot.com/2011/11/standards-of-medical-education-in.html), SPA is asking MMC to remove the compulsory service so that the government do not need to provide a job to you after housemanship. There are a lot of implications if all these comes true. Firstly, an inexperienced doctor is not going to be a good GP. With litigations rate going up everywhere, these doctors will not survive with the public demand. They will be sued all the time. Secondly, if you do not get a job in civil service, you can forget about postgraduate training and applying for Master’s. At this point of time, only training in government hospitals is recognised. Even if you get a contract job, it does not mean you will be posted where you want to. Your training can still be compromised. The way I see it, there is going to be a lot of chronic medical officers in near future with little post-graduate opportunities. This is when your basic medical degree recognition is going to be very important in finding a job/postgraduate training somewhere else in this world.

Even Academy of Medicine Malaysia is very much worried about postgraduate opportunities in near future. Residency style training is being considered to shorten the training programme and produce specialist faster but this need to be carefully deliberated. It’s implication to our healthcare system also need to be considered as not all our hospitals are equipped with all speciality.

Soon, the title of the news will be “Temporary doctors protest unfavourable terms in contract!…………………..”

Temporary teachers protest unfavourable terms in contract

By KANG SOON CHEN
educate@thestar.com.my

KAJANG: A group of temporary teachers protested outside the Hulu Langat education district office over new terms in their service contracts.

They claimed they were at a disadvantage with the new terms.

Under the new contract, their salaries will be reduced from RM2,500 to RM2,300 and they will not receive allowances or EPF contributions from the government as of next year.

The terms, effective Oct 15 this year, also pointed out that the teachers had to return the allowances and EPF paid to them for October and November.

They were also disgruntled that they would not get paid for the December school holidays.

“It is unfair,” said the group’s spokesman.

“The terms of the new contract overwrite the earlier one that we signed this year and that was supposed to be effective until the end of the year,” she said, adding that they would lose their jobs if they failed to comply.

“There was also no guarantee that we will be absorbed into permanent positions.”

In March, Education director-general Datuk Seri Abdul Ghafar Mahmud announced that 6,000 of the 13,000 temporary teachers were ready to be absorbed as permanent teachers.

Deputy Education Minister Datuk Dr Wee Ka Siong said the ministry was working on a solution to end their predicament.

Earlier, he had said the government’s decision to absorb temporary teachers into permanent posts had resulted in insufficient funds to pay their salaries.

Read Full Post »

Arrogance or stupidity?

Sometimes I really get annoyed and pissed off with some of the junior doctors and the frontliners. If they are not into treating patients and care for patients, then they should just quit and find another job. Over the last few weeks I have come across few cases that was mismanaged even after being referred by a consultant (obviously from a private sector). Some how, some of these frontliners are arrogant and feel that they should not take any ideas/opinion from private specialist. I will give you these examples:

1) A 60-year-old man who has Mitral stenosis, AF , Diabetes and Gout came to see me for frequent attack of Gout. He is being planned for valve replacement surgery soon. His diabetic is being followed up by a Klinik Kesihatan(KK) and under insulin therapy. I noticed that his diabetes is not well controlled despite being planned for surgery soon within the next 2 months. This is a well-educated english speaking patient. His FBS was 15 and HBA1C was > 10%. Thus I advised him to adjust his insulin dose by himself by educating the patient to monitor his blood sugar at home regularly. I also managed his gout accordingly. 2 weeks later, he came back to see me and what he told me really irritated me. It seems that the MO in the KK refuse to see him since he had seek advise from a private consultant. He claim that the patient must only listen to him!! I wonder why is the blood sugar not well controlled then?  Then I realised another stupidity that this MO is doing! When I looked at the little green book that all diabetics carry, I noted that his so-called “FBS” was always between 4-6.0 mmol/L while his own home GM monitoring was above 10 mmol/L all the time.

So I asked the patient ” Do you go fasting when they take the  blood? ”

Answer:  ” Yes and I also take my insulin before I go to see them???? WTH!! no wonder his blood sugar is low when he goes to KK. Sometimes, he even gets hypoglycaemia symptoms while waiting to take blood.

Is this arrogance or stupidity?

2) A 38 weeks pregnant mother was noted to have IUGR by a KK MO. She was referred to the specialist clinic of a GH. Patient’s referral letter was seen by a MO at the clinic and given appointment in 2 week’s time!! WTH, by then she will be 40 weeks pregnant. Even me, who had not done O&G for 15 years, knows that IUGR need to be delivered by 38 weeks! The patient was shocked and came to my hospital for opinion.

3) A 30 weeks pregnant mother was diagnosed by a private consultant to have Placenta Praevia Type 2 with previous scar, possible placenta accreta was considered. She was referred to a GH after spoken to the MO on call. Now she is 36 weeks pregnant and no proper plan has been made for her. In fact, she has not even seen or followed up by any specialist up to today. Only once it was written ” discussed with DR so ….so” . Such a high risk patient being followed up by MO with no proper delivery plan??? what the hell is happening?

4) A 20-year-old boy who became paraplegic after a MVA was admitted to our hospital for UTI sepsis (Pseudomonas MRO organism). He was on halovest. He was started on Sulperazon and the fever settled on 2nd day. He had appointment at GH the next day for removal of halovest. Our Ortho consultant wrote a letter to the GH doctor to admit this patient and con’t the antibiotic for atleast another 4 days. When the patient saw the doctor at GH, the letter was read but just thrown to the side. The halovest was removed, T unasyn was prescribed and the patient was not admitted. 3 days later, fever spiked again and readmitted at my hospital. Despite a letter from a private consultant, the opinion was ignored! Now, the patient has to spend more money!

 Some how I feel that the newer generation of doctors and even specialist are becoming more uncaring and only interested in finishing their work and going back home. This, along with arrogance is screwing up the system. However, they don’t seem to realise their stupidity and the fact that patients are getting smarter. Sooner or later, lawyer’s letters going to reach their doorstep and the government is not going to cover you!

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »