Feeds:
Posts
Comments
This letter below was written in Malaysiakini by a person who called himself “Professor Kangkong“. We must accept the fact that our universities have become the laughing-stock of the nation. The letter below is a clear example of what is happening in our universities.
 
I was made to understand that in some local universities, you are given an A/Prof post if you just publish 3 papers in any journal or conference publication. This means that if you publish 3 abstracts in any conference (conference publications) you can be considered for an A/Prof post. The same goes if you can publish 3 papers in any journals, it does not matter whether it is an index journal or no impact factor journal! At first I did not believe this untill I saw it with my own eyes! I have even seen so-called “A/Prof” who can’t speak proper English!
 
Compare this with Monash university Australia where almost 80% of their academics retire at the level of Senior Lecturer after years of service! They not only look at the number of publications but the impact factor and the quality of the publications. Conference publications, abstracts, letters to editor, images are not considered. Case reports are also not considered equivalent to a full article.
 
I have given up on our local universities. What is the failure rate of our university students? Any guess? I am sure it is 100% pass rate unless the students drop out by him/herself.
I just hope my children will be able to study in some prestigious universities overseas. For that I need to save lots of money from now onwards…………….. and that’s the reason I am going full-time private from June 2010!
 
UPM – a ‘research university’ condoning plagiarism
//
Professor Kankong
Apr 6, 10
3:34pm
Last year, two Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) academics, a professor and deputy dean and a senior lecturer, were exposed for plagiarism, the most serious offence in academia.

Both of them plagiarised from the Internet and used the material for their ‘book’- ‘Writing an Effective Resume.’

No action was taken against these two, the UPM vice-chancellor Prof Dr Nik Mustapha R Abdullah said a warning was adequate – they both kept their job and titles and did not lose anything.

How can UPM – a research university – condone plagiarism? You call yourself a world-class university and yet allow your staff to plagiarise with impunity. Is it any wonder that standards in Malaysian universities are dropping like stones?

Worse still, the book is still available on the market. It looks like in Malaysian universities, research means copying from the Internet. Worse still, they are both still doing ‘research’.

If Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak wants to improve the standards of our public universities, the first thing he needs to do is to take action and punish these so-called professors. Worse, one of them is now a member of the National Professors Board. What a joke.

What does it take to clean up the monkeys in our public universities? UPM – University of Plagiarists Malaysia?

The recent announcement by PM regarding the promotional prospect of government doctors is something commendable. When I was in SCHOMOS(Governement wing of MMA) from 2002-2006, we had many suggestions and discussion with Ministry of Health(MOH) regarding the promotional prospect of doctors. Many of our suggestions were shot down.

We did suggest that all MOs should be in U44 upon finishing Housemanship. I personally wrote this proposal to the Minister, Dato Dr Chua Soi Lek in 2006 and it became a reality last year.  We also proposed that all MOs of more than 8 years of service should be given U48 after which the promotion should depend on availability of post and the type of job they are doing.

As for specialist we proposed that all specialist should be given U48 from the date of gazettment and U54 upon completing their subspecialty. U52 will be somewhere in between.

Well, the recent announcement says that all specialist will be promoted to U54 within 9 years of service and all MOs will be in U54 after 12 years of service.

Although it is an interesting development and the afford taken by the PM himself on this, is commendable, several problems will arise from this “time-based” promotional scheme. One of the main problems in the civil service is the fact that promotion is never based on merit! this is the phenomenon that is screwing up the system. Furthermore, no action can be taken against these civil servants even though they are hardly doing any job. The commonest action usually taken are “transfers”. They will be transferred from one place to another, making his/her job easier from place to place but receiving the same salary and annual increments. Finally the very same person will be promoted with the rest of the people!

Now, this sickness may be coming into the MOH soon. With the time based promotion introduced into the system, will an MO be interested in doing speciality? wouldn’t it be easy if he just stays as a MO and at the end of 12 years, he will be given U54. The only difference with the specialist will be the “Specialist Allowance” which is about RM 2800 for U54. The MO can easily earn this from doing locums either in MOH or outside. Thus there are no special incentives in encouraging these MOs in doing speciality. They can just park themselves in some rural/semi-rural clinics and continue to enjoy the same salary as with a specialist with less commitments etc. Of course, the good ones will strive to become a specialist but what do they get?

The specialist in the other hand will be at U54 after 9 years of service whether they have subspeciality or not! This is another form of discouragement for specialist. Why must they bother doing subspeciality when there are not going to be any added advantage in civil service. You would have reached U54 by then. In fact, currently there are alot of dissatisfaction among the senior specialist as they are going to be sitting at the same salary scale with their junior specialist who are 3-5 years junior! We have senior consultants who will be at the same salary with their junior trainees. So why bother doing subspeciality!! Those who are really interested will still do it but would they remain in civil service since there is no added appreciation?

These are issues that will be cropping up soon. These steps will definitely retain more doctors in the civil service temporarily. Soon after, frustration will grow again for the senior specialist as they will continue to sit on U54 forever and nothing to hope for anymore. JUSA C post are limited and not everyone will be promoted to JUSA C and thus a bottle neck will appear at U54.  Remember your annual increment in U54 is only about RM 180. It will take about 20 years for the basic starting salary of RM 5000+ to reach RM 7 000+.

This new “time based” promotion definitely benefits the MOs more than anyone else. Thus, the government may be retaining more MOs than specialist in long run, unless they come up with a separate salary scheme for specialists.

Furthermore, with 4000 new doctors coming into the market now, would there be enough post to promote everyone. At the moment this type of promotion may look good as there are many vacant post to play around with but within the next 3-5 years all these posts will be filled and another new problem will arise. No Post No Promotion! Remember, doctors will also lose their critical allowance when all the post have been filled. Medicine will not be considered a critical post anymore. That means a RM 750 pay cut! The critical allowance for pharmacist is going to be removed soon if not already.

Lastly, are we giving these promotion based on merit! We already know that the quality of current doctors are going down the drain. We know that there are many “dead wood” specialist sand consultants in MOH. The good ones get frustrated and leave as they are the one seems to be doing all the work and the HODs seem to be flying around the world attending all sort of conferences. I know some HODs who stays at home most of the time taking care of their children but gets paid a JUSA C salary! We’re going to see a lot of this in near future with this type of “time-based” promotion. Why work when you know that you will get the promotion anyway!

This is another well written article by Mariam Mokhtar. I just hope everyone thinks like her.
As long as the Malays need crutches, they will never improve. After 40 years of NEP we seem to be going down the drain when all our neighbours are outperforming us!
 
Ketuanan Melayu: Am I Alone?
//
Mariam Mokhtar
Mar 30, 10
11:33am
 
When one reads about an organisation led by an insecure, attention seeking leader, who revels in obfuscating remarks to “defend Islam, the special rights of Malays and bumiputeras”, it does seem that the lunatics have taken over the asylum.

So, am I alone in thinking that Malays should debunk ketuanan Melayu (Malay supremacy)? When challenging small, hate-filled groups we must be aware of the risks in talking up the threat they pose.

perkasa publicationThey may hope we would demonstrate or march to the police station and make reports (the police have better things to do) and give the group added gravitas. 

Probably the more invectives that are hurled in retaliation, the happier they would be. No, we are not a hysterical lot.

Clamours for ketuanan Melayu are an insult to me and right-minded Malays. Malays today are knowledgable. Extremist views on race and religion are not our vision of Malaysia. We aim for solidarity by encouraging participation from all sections of society for a truly democratic nation.

Confident Malays are not threatened by other races. Nor do they feel inferior or undermined. They are not spiritually bankrupt and do not get confused when non-Muslims use words like Allah.

Too few benefit

The NEP made a few Malay millionaires into billionaires. It excluded the Malay majority and hence failed spectacularly in its objectives. The government must be more creative in helping Malays attain success. Why stick with a recipe for failure?

Last week’s histrionics demonstrate that you can take the boy out of the kampong but you cannot take the kampong out of the boy. Fortunately, not all Malays live under their tempurung (coconut shell). We don’t need men who profess to be leaders by espousing ketuanan Melayu but in reality are just sabre-rattlers.

perkasa first agm 270310 bannerMalaysians are aware of their surroundings – abuses of power, select Malays selfishly milking the NEP, endemic corruption, public institutions compromising their neutrality by becoming political stooges, no accountability in government bodies and politicians.

There are many disadvantaged people in Malaysia. Our urban and rural folk lead parallel lives, with little overlap. Our society consists of the ‘haves’ and the ‘have-nots’. Racism, sexism and ageism are rife. It is little wonder there is a rise in cynicism. It is amusing to see the ‘1Malaysia’ concept in a mess because of these.

We are a young nation, and we attained independence through the collective effort of the peoples of Malaya: Ordinary Malayans – rubber tappers, tin coolies, jungle clearers, road builders, railway workers, teachers, policemen, port labourers.

They were Malays, Chinese, Indians, Eurasians, Orang Asli. Some made the ultimate sacrifice in the name of independence. Must we now forget their contributions and treat their children and grandchildren not as true Malaysians, but merely as immigrants? Are we not indebted to them?

My great-grandfather was a rubber-tapper and he encouraged his son (my grandfather) to study and lift them out of poverty. At night, he studied by the light of a kerosene lamp. During the day, he escaped being called out to play by the other boys, by hiding and reading in the middle of a patch of long grass.

The daily journey to secondary school in Ipoh was by train and on foot. He then entered the Malayan Civil Service (MCS), worked his way up and was sent to England for various courses and tests. He grabbed every opportunity and was a success.

He worked in the towns and villages, throughout Malaya, but complained that the Malay youth then were indisciplined, were bad at time-keeping and had an attitude problem. Many suffered from kais pagi, makan pagi (living from hand-to-mouth) and lacked motivation to work. The majority considered the bounties from the fruit trees or rivers sufficient for their daily needs.

This lack of incentive is deeply entrenched and will remain entrenched unless there is a brutal effort to exorcise it from the Malay psyche. We must give Malays a way out of poverty and halt their dependence on the NEP. The challenge is for them to break out of the spiral of underachievement and low expectation.

A crutch, not a panacea

The NEP, or its reincarnation, will not help the Malays or Malaysia. Instead of making Malays more competitive, it will make them more reliant on false hopes. It will make them idle and addicted to being the master, the supreme race, with little effort involved. It is a destructive ideology. It destroys their character and robs them of an identity. It is an admission of weakness. It relieves them of pride and dignity.

The Malays have had large amounts of money spent on them. No amount of money will elevate them unless it is put to good use to improve themselves. The desire to improve must come from within. They must understand that ambition and aspiration entails hard work and perseverance.

Malays have a strong cultural identity and family values but the NEP has helped institutionalise underachievement. So how can we offer security to our children if our adults lack ambition?

perkasa first agm 270310 bigger kerisEducation and a strong stable family life must be foremost in policy changes to make a difference. But politicians have messed up our education system. Government must create opportunities. We need investments, both locally and from abroad, but Malaysia’s negative image precludes that.

Those who champion ketuanan Melayu should concentrate on the Malay community and seek answers for the following:- Malays lacking aspiration; Malay girls outperforming boys; Malay men abrogating responsibilities towards their family, spending money on successively younger wives, leaving families severely disadvantaged; high divorce rates in Malay marriages;

Most drug addicts and HIV/AIDS sufferers are Malays; abandoned babies are primarily Malays; incest, rape and sexual crimes are committed mainly by Malays. Why not sort out your priorities, clean up your own house first and stop pointing fingers?

Sadly, few Malays are willing to admit the faults within them but would rather lay the blame on other races. And please stop brandishing the keris about. They are revered items, as any good Malay knows, and should never be used in a cheap publicity gimmick.

 Our politicians have pea sized brains. Mahathir who is known as a “Man in a hurry” wanted to see as many Malay professionals, millionaires and billionaires in the shortest time possible. Thus he dig the grave for the country.

He screwed up the education system of the country, brought down the standards of the public exams and universities so that he can see thousands and thousands of graduates. Who cares about the quality? What he wanted is only numbers. He wanted to see Malay millionaires and thus used the government coffers to feed some UMNO cronies to make them rich and stand as tall as the Chinese businessman but what he forgot is the fact that this type of millionnaire would not last long and would not help the poorer segment of the society. That’s why the widest income disparity are among the Malays currently.

By bringing down the standards of our universities(we have one of the highest number of universities per capita of population in the world), we are producing thousands of unemployable graduates. If you look at the article below which was published in The Malaysian Insider today, you can see clearly what is happening in reality. Yes, we are producing thousands but they got no brains!!!! period! What is the failure rate in our universities? Any Guess? If the lecturer fails the student, the lecturer gets booted out!

These graduates got no interest at the first place in what they have just studied as, they were just told to do the particular course by the powers to be. Secondly, they lack good command of english which prevents them from applying for a job in the private sector. Many of them do not even know how to write a resume for job application!.

At the end they apply for government job and end up as a teacher in schools. That’s why the education standards are dropping! Now, we even have fresh graduates being appointed as lecturer in both public and private universities.  What experience do they have to teach the students especially in fields like engineering, nursing, law etc etc.

It is going into a vicious cycle. Unemployable graduates with no merit getting into teaching profession in both schools and universities which in turn will continue to produce underqualified and unemployable graduates.  This vicious cycle will continue till the country goes down the drain and finally picks itself up or probably never!

How do you expect to pay high salary when you do not have enough brains to do simple job. I heard our engineers can’t even do simple calculation, so don’t expect to be paid high!

Doctors/nurses are next in line for this madness. Please read the article on “Doctor’s too many” in my earlier post.

A tale of twin addictions: ‘Cheap stuff and foreign workers’

By Sheridan Mahavera

BANGI, March 30 — Wanted Urgently: Electronic engineers for Bangi-based multi-national corporation manufacturing capacitors. Starting salary: RM2,500. Benefits: full medical, housing and personal loans, and a RM200 monthly transport allowance.

Sounds like a plum job for our engineering graduates right? The employer in question, Nichicon (Malaysia) sdn Bhd, doesn’t think it was attractive enough.

Its human resources manager Mohd Taufik Abdullah claims despite advertising everywhere and postings on job sites, the company could not get even one Malaysian to fill the 10 posts available.

“In the end, we were forced to hire Filipino engineers through an agent we knew.

“Yes, we hear it all the time too, that universities and colleges produce thousands of engineers a year. But where were they when we were looking for them?” asks Mohd Taufik.

That industries are addicted to foreigners to do the menial, repetitive, tiring, dirty, hazardous but critical jobs is not a new thing. But highly-paid and skilled posts like engineers?

And it’s not just engineers, says Mohd Taufik and his colleague Noor Azman Abdullah of Hosiden Electronics (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd.

Factories in the Bangi area, where most of the big-name electronic factories in Selangor are based, are having problems hiring local clerks, technicians and junior executives.

This is not the tip of the iceberg. This is the iceberg, claims factories and the associations who represent them in Selangor, Malaysia’s most industrialised state.

The government froze new permits for foreign workers in September 2009. It was partly to cure this addiction to foreigners and to protect retrenched Malaysian workers during the economic recession.

But companies say that there are no locals to hire and the freeze is severely crippling them.

To merely say this is a problem that needs a solution is to underestimate the dimensions of the issue. In a way, the addiction to foreigners is intertwined with how the Malaysian economy has grown over the past two decades.

More accurately, the dependency is a result of the tremendous explosion of the middle-class in the 70s and the highly-qualified generation of the 80s and 90s that was born to that strata of society.

The continued need for foreigners has also spawned a cancerous network of agents, corrupt officials and unscrupulous manufacturers that seem to operate behind the formal economy and which feeds its existence.

And if this manpower imbalance is not dealt with really, really soon, it will tighten the snares around Selangor and the rest of Malaysia, and prevent it from ever escaping the middle-income trap.

“It’s not just our graduates who are leaving”

The companies are already leaving, declares Selangor Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers chairman Tan Sri Alfred James.

“At the end of last year, an electronics giant in Bangi could not get the 1,000 workers it requested. They went straight to the government but the minister they met couldn’t help them. In the end, they packed up and left.

“They had wanted to expand their base in Malaysia. They have been here for decades and had established themselves yet they couldn’t expand because they couldn’t get workers,” says James.

The shortage over the past several months after the permit freeze have been the most acute. Though there is a freeze, companies can only apply for foreigners if they can demonstrate that they have tried and failed to hire locals.

According to an FMM survey in September 2009, 94 companies in the state reported that they had a total of 11,580 vacancies for unskilled posts. Of those, 4,991 were in the electrical and electronics sector.

James claims that in the beginning of this year there were up to 13,000 vacancies.

Though the government said that about 100,000 permits had been approved to fill this critical shortage, James says that it is not enough.

“It’s 100,000 workers for the whole of Malaysia. The 13,000 we need is only for the industrial sector in Selangor. It does not count the services sector, the restaurants, the small shops that need workers. “

James contends that there is a lag time between getting permit approvals and actually getting the workers into the factories — a process that can take up to a year.

The companies in the survey claimed that they needed foreigners because locals “shied away or did not stay long” in “3D jobs” — dirty, dangerous and demeaning.

Another reason for not hiring locals was the “high rate of absenteeism and turnover.”

More electronics giants have threatened to move their operations out of Malaysia if the government cannot help them ease their worker shortages.

Electronic and electrical firms are especially important to Selangor as amongst all the state’s industries, they contribute the most to its Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

Industries on a whole contribute about 37.3 per cent to Selangor’s GDP.

“This is a major reason deterring new investments,” claims James. “We’ve had companies who want to open up in Malaysia but who have turned back when they saw the manpower problems.”

The same old tune

Veteran union organiser G. Rajasekaran has heard all of this before and scoffs at them.

“There are 400,000 school leavers every year.,100,000 of them will pursue tertiary education and that leaves 300,000 people entering the job market.

“These are SPM-qualified kids and they are coming to Penang, Johor and the Klang valley for jobs. If you pay them enough they will work in your factory,” insists G. Rajasekaran, secretary-general of Malaysian Trade Union Congress, the umbrella body for all private sector unions.

His point is seen in the wages of 24 of 94 companies in the Selangor FMM survey:

More than half (17) offered a basic salary of between RM400 to RM700 per month. Two of them offered only RM20 to RM50 a day in wages. One company offered between RM800 to RM900 a month and another was prepared to pay RM1,000 a month.

“The government had set the minimum pension for retirees at RM720 per month. The reasoning is that no one can live on less.

“So if it is acknowledged that this is the minimum someone needs to live on, why are these factories only paying an average salary of RM500?”

Though companies claim that with various allowances and overtime, workers can take home close to RM900, Rajasekaran counters that these extras pay for the cost of going to work. The transport allowance, for instance, evaporates like the petrol fumes.

In reality, can you reasonably get someone to live on RM600 a month in the Klang Valley, Penang or Johor since these are where the industries are, asks Rajasekaran.

Which is why he repeats MTUC’s clarion call for the government to set the minimum wage at RM900 a month to suit Malaysia’s cost of living. Thailand and Vietnam, for instance, where some of these companies are threatening to relocate to, have minimum wage rates.

However, Selangor FMM’s James counters this by saying that there is no guarantee that raising wages would get locals to work.

The problem with a minimum wage, James argues, is that it will make employers band together and not raise salaries.

“You must let wages be market-driven,” he says.

The price of more shopping malls

Noor Azman has clocked in close to 30 years as a human resource manager in a few international manufacturers and believes that this is all a cycle.

“When I started out in the 80s, every kid from the kampung and Felda schemes came to Selangor to work in the factories. And then it became harder to hire them in the early 90s and we started sourcing workers from countries poorer than us.

“Our kids on the other hand are now factory workers, cooks and waiters in Singapore and the UK because wages there are higher.”

In other words, we are the “Indons and Banglas” of the UK. And it’s really not hard to figure out how this happened.

Another senior manager of an electronics firm does not say it out right but it would be hard for his company — a component manufacturer for all manner of electronics like remote controls, phones, computers and refrigerators — to raise wages.

The mean salary of production operators he says had been raised to RM650 to better entice locals. But a higher salary would eat into the company’s operating costs and crimp its ability to compete with rivals.

In other words, there is a connection between our love for cheap electronics and Malaysia’s low wages for unskilled labour.

This is not just a Selangor or even a Malaysian problem.

A December 2004 report in BusinessWeek magazine highlighted how US manufacturers of state-of-the-art products such as precision machine tools and circuit boards for military equipment, were literally dying from Chinese imports.

The American businesses interviewed in the report said their Chinese rivals were able to make their products at 30 to 50 per cent less because Chinese workers were paid less than Americans.

The more “developed” Malaysia becomes and the more college and university graduates it produces, the more the country will need foreign workers, Selangor FMM’s James says.

It’s no accident that the country started importing more and more foreigners in the early 90s — when affordable private colleges blossomed everywhere and swallowed the masses of youths born to the New Economic Policy generation.

“Every child wants to study and this creates a vacuum in terms of labour,” says James. The vacuum is not just in factories but seen in the “sales assistant wanted” posters in the numerous shopping malls sprouting all over the country.

“Who is going to fill these jobs? The reality is that there may not be enough Malaysians.

“And if we do not want foreign workers then we must make do with fewer malls, fewer restaurants, fewer hypermarkets and fewer luxuries.”

 

Well, as I wrote in my earlier post, I said Goodbye to my Samsung i780 after almost 2 years. And yes, I bought my new Blackberry Bold 9700 from Celcom on 22nd March 2010.

I must say that so far I am totally satisfied with this phone. It is clear with high-resolution display, super fast and extremely easy to use and handle.

The battery life is excellent. I was playing around with it and downloading few softwares the whole day and the battery was still more than 50% at 10pm!! I just hope the battery life will remain like this forever……… because a new battery will cost about RM 250!!

The phone can pick up GPS satellites signals in less than 30 seconds whereas I need to wait almost 3-5 minutes in my earlier phone. The trackpad is so easy to use and you can adjust the sensitivity based on your needs.

The push email is excellent as well. You will receive the email faster than your desktop. Trust me! This was what I wanted for a long time.

Well guys, I am not sure about iPhone, but Blackberry Bold 2 is superb. If you are frequent web browser, than iPhone will be better for you.

I am still playing with it…………………….

 
The article below was written by Dr.Hsu in The Malaysian Insider today. He is spot on, regarding the problems we are currently facing due to over-supply of doctors from all these medical schools. I wrote an article way back in 2006 in the MMA magazine regarding the impending disaster that was waiting to happen due to the mushrooming of the profit based medical schools in the country(please read my article under My MMA Articles page). I have also written about it again last year regarding the qualities of house officers and this month(out soon), I have also written an article about the future prospects of doctors in this country.
 
Well, whatever I have predicted has become a reality now. There are 50 housemen in each department now with no proper supervision from the consultants. They are of so poor quality that many consultants have totally given up. As one consultant rightly puts it “we are not here to teach the housemen basic medicine”.
 
I am really sad but need to accept the fact that these doctors are going to be running our health sector in the near future. I pity the poor rakyat who will die in the hands of these underqualified and undertrained doctors. They will have the “license to kill” !!!! but then again Malaysia Bolehmah………………..
 The next in line will be the nursing colleges,  have lost count of the numbers. Even if you have failed SPM you can enroll yourself in nursing colleges!!!!Trust me.
 
Soon, in less than 5 years you will be seeing jobless doctors who will be venturing into other fields to stay alive
 
BTW MasterSkills will be opening a medical school at their Pasir Gudang branch soon. They have just advertised in the paper for academic recruitment!
 
 
Dr Hsu Dar Ren is a medical doctor and blogs on socio-economic issues; he believes that a fair and equitable society with good governance is the key to the future of this country.

A doctor too many

MARCH 26 — Malaysia, a country with about 26 million inhabitants, boasts of 24 medical schools now.

Just a few years ago, the number was less than 10. In fact, when my eldest son entered medical school 10 years back, I could count the medical schools with my fingers. Now even with my toes and my fingers, I can no longer. Some of the names are so new that I, as a doctor, did not even know they existed until I did some research for this article.

The list is below:

Public universities:

* University of Malaya, Faculty of Medicine

* Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Faculty of Medicine

* Universiti Sains Malaysia, School of Medical Sciences

* Universiti Putra Malaysia, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences

* Universiti Malaysia Sabah, School of Medicine

* Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences

* International Islamic University Malaysia, Kulliyyah of Medicine

* Universiti Teknologi Mara, Faculty of Medicine

* Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences

* Universiti Darul Iman, Faculty of Medicine

Private Universities and Colleges

* UCSI University, Faculty of Medical Sciences — School of Medicine

* Monash University Malaysia, School of Medicine and Health Sciences

* International Medical University, Faculty of Medicine

* AIMST University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences

* Allianze College Of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine

* Management and Science University, Faculty of Medicine

* Cyberjaya University College of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine

* Royal College of Medicine Perak, School of Medicine

* Melaka Manipal Medical College, School of Medicine

* Penang Medical College, School of Medicine

* MAHSA University College, Faculty of Medicine

* Newcastle University Medicine Malaysia (NuMED)

* Taylor’s University College, School of Medicine

* Utar

These are the medical schools in Malaysia. These schools, when fully functional, will produce about 4,000 doctors a year.  There will be thousands more Malaysian doctors being produced overseas, since many Malaysians are studying medicine in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, India, Indonesia, Russia, Taiwan and even Ukraine.

The sudden mushrooming of medical schools is apparently due to shortages of doctors in the public sectors. This is because most doctors in government service resign after their compulsory services and opt for the supposedly greener pasture in the private sector.

In most other countries, the logical thing to do to counter this brain drain of doctors to the private sector  is to find out why doctors are resigning from government service, and then try to address the woes of the doctors, and hopefully, keep them  in service.  I call this common logic.

The Malaysian solution, like in many other instances, does not take common logic into account but rather uses the sledgehammer approach. After all, we do have Malaysian logic, which is different from common logic practised in most other countries. For example, if we cannot have spacecraft of our own, we can still produce astronauts by sending Malaysians into space, hitchhiking on other countries’ spacecraft.

In most other countries, the common logic will be to try to improve the working conditions in public sector so that doctors will stay back. But Malaysian logic is sledgehammer logic, and is very different.

If the doctors do not want to stay in government service, then Malaysia shall flood the market with doctors, so goes the Malaysian logic. Never mind that setting up of medical schools and training doctors are expensive businesses. We have petroleum and huge amount of development funds.

By building more buildings and buying expensive medical equipment to equip these medical schools, billions will have to be spent and, of course, in the Malaysian context, everyone will be happy, down from the planners, the contractors, the parents  and all others involved, since the perception is that  projects in Malaysia inevitably will have some leakages and wastages, and many people are very happy with these leakages and wastages.

Never mind that we may have the hardware but we may not have enough qualified people to man these medical schools.

The Malaysian logic seems to be like this: If enough doctors are produced, the market will be saturated with doctors, and thus, doctors will have nowhere to go but to stay in government service.

Well, the people may be clapping hands and rejoicing that, with more doctors than are needed, medical costs will come down.

Unfortunately, things do not function like this in medical education. Experience in some countries tells us that some doctors in private practice, when faced with too few patients, will charge higher and do more investigations, some of which may not be needed. So instead of medical cost going down, it will go up.

In any advanced nation, the setting up of a medical school requires a lot of planning and is not done on an ad hoc basis. Planning must include where to source for experienced and qualified teachers; where to build new or source for existing teaching hospitals, which are big enough for the placement of these medical students to do training.

Planning such as facilities, equipment, classrooms, curriculum. In the west, it takes many years of training for a medical school to be set up; whereas in Malaysia, we see more than 10 in the last five years.

In Malaysia, due to the sudden “exponential” increase in medical schools, we have medical schools pinching staff from each other, even the mediocre ones. With that number of qualified teachers only, it is unavoidable that many teachers may not have the experience and qualification to be medical lecturers.

The early birds (medical schools) are more fortunate. Their students are placed in bigger hospitals like the General Hospitals of Kuala Lumpur or Penang. Now, some of the medical schools just opened have to send their students to smaller district hospitals to do their training. The smaller hospitals are often manned by more junior doctors who are not qualified to be medical teachers, and these hospitals have only very basic facilities and equipment.

This is just the beginning of the problems. For a doctor, graduating from a medical school is the beginning of a life long journey, and the basic medical degree is more like a license to start to really learn how to manage and treat patients.

The most important year after a doctor graduates is the houseman-ship. If a doctor does not have proper houseman training, then he would face a lot of problems later on. He or she may know all the medical knowledge in the world (just for argument’s sake, since knowledge of medicine is so vast that no one can know everything), but without the proper houseman training, he or she will not get the hand-on experience so crucial and important to doctors.

A doctor without proper houseman training is not unlike a person who has only ever raced in arcade games, suddenly being asked to race in a real life race. He would not have the hands on experience to do well. A doctor without  proper houseman training would be like a person given a license to kill, and a disaster waiting to happen.

Now, with 4,000 doctors being produced in a year, where do we find so many houseman positions for these young doctors?

Even now, with some of the medical schools just starting and not yet producing doctors, and the number of doctors being produced is much less than the 4,000, the wards in some of the bigger hospitals are filled with so many housemen that, in some wards, there are not enough patients for these housemen to learn management skills.

About a year back, I was told, in HKL some of the units have more than 20 housemen. Recently one doctor told me that in some units, it may have even more than that. I was aghast. Since with that many housemen in a single unit, and so few senior officers to guide them and so few patients for them to learn from, how are they going to learn the skill of doctoring?

When there is not enough training for these housemen, what do you think our policy planners do? In the typical Malaysian style, they increase the length of houseman-ship from a year to 2, hoping that the longer time will help to give better exposure to these doctors.

Compared to Australia, New Zealand, and United Kingdom,  houseman-ship is still one year  only. By increasing the length of the houseman-ship, it is a tacit admission that our one-year houseman training is not as good as the above mentioned countries.

A poorly trained houseman will become a mediocre medical officer, and since now most of the specialists are trained internally, it will be a matter of time before future specialists may not be as well trained as presently.

Many parents do not know about the actual situation and still encourage their children to take up medicine. They are not told of the actual situation. The day will come when there are simply so many doctors that none are adequately trained. There will come a day when a doctor graduating from a medical school cannot even be placed in a houseman position.

And that day is actually very near.

* The views expressed here are the personal opinion of the columnist.

I bought my Samsung i780 PDA phone in April 2008 during a PC fair in Johor Bahru. It worked well in the beginning before I changed my sim card to 3G . The battery life was excellent if you use the phone for just calling without 3G services. The only problem then, was the Windows Mobile 6.0 software that they were using. It hangs frequently especially if you are opening and closing multiple programs.

The 1st problem came about after I changed to 3G service. The battery life sucked! If before, it can last for more than a day, now it lasted for less than 24 hours. If you do overnight charging, it can last till you get home and will need charging again by 10pm. Mind you, this was on minimum usage of 2-3 calls, less than 5 SMS and email synchronization of every 2-4 hours. One of the problem with Windows Mobile software was that it need to synchronize with email service providers to download the messages. Thus, this sucks the battery.

The 2nd problem came after I upgraded the software to Windows Mobile 6.1. Even though it was more stable than the previous version(less hanging I mean) it sucked the battery even further. After upgrading, the battery only lasted for 6 hours. I had to buy a car charger to charge the battery when I am driving. I had to reduce the email synchronization to every 4 hours which defeats the purpose of buying this type of phone. If you use Bluetooth headset or WiFi, then the battery will kaput even faster!

Thus, after using it for almost 2 years, I decided to change my phone. Stay tuned for my next update of my latest phone…………….

After buying my Blu-ray DVD player, I was wondering where to get original blue-ray DVDs cheaper than at Speedy video. The only speedy video shop that sells original Blu-ray DVD is at Tebrau city. An original blue-ray will cost anything between RM 119 -159, almost double the price of original DVD.

I was seaching through the internet and suddenly came across an interesting suggestion. Buy the blue-ray DVD from Amazon.com!

 It seems that there are people in KL who buys these DVDs from Amazon.com in bulk and sells it at cheaper price.

So, I decided to try out amazon.com website and guess what, it is definitely cheaper. I bought an original blue-ray of Transformers 2 and it cost me only RM100, including normal shipment. Initially, I thought it will take about a month for it to reach my house but surprisingly, it reached my doorstep within 2 weeks from the order date!

So if you want to buy original blue-ray at a cheaper price, go to www.amazon.com. I have already pre booked Avatar………………….

This is an interesting piece by Kit Siang in Parliment

Looking at the delays in announcing the so called New Economic Model by our PM clearly shows that the UMNOputras will never allow such a thing to happen. UMNO created PERKASA to do it’s job as they can’t be seen to go against PM’s statement towards the non-bumis.

As long as UMNO is in power, there will be no change in this country and we are bound to be doomed.

 

New Economic Model – has it been hijacked by Neo-NEP Umnoputras like Perkasa

 

When Datuk Seri Najib Razak became Prime Minister last April, he announced that the government would introduce a new economic model for the country to ensure that Malaysia makes a quantum leap to escape the middle-income trap to become a high-income country through greater emphasis on innovation, creativity and competitiveness.

In May last year, the Second Finance Minister, Datuk Seri Ahmad Husni Hanadzlah said the new economic model would be announced in the second half of the year.

Time is clearly of the critical essence to launch a new economic model as Husni subsequently admitted in a very frank speech in December that the country had lost a decade in economic stagnation.

In actual fact, the World Bank had recommended that Malaysia adopt a new economic model three years ago, stressing that industrial countries are already aiming for economic model 3.0, and with competition at economic model 1.0 intensifying, striving to achieve economic model 2.0 is not an option for Malaysia but a necessity.

The question is why the World Bank’s advice that Malaysia migrate to a new economic model 2.0 was ignored for three years, losing more precious time for Malaysia to catch up in the international competitiveness race when the country had become a straggler as compared to other countries.

When the country achieved nationhood in 1957, Malaysia was the second most economically-advanced country in Asia after Japan.

Today, South Korea’s GDP per capita is US$16,450, Singapore US$34,346, Hong Kong US$29,559 while Malaysia is still at US$7,469 – with the disparity between Malaysia and these countries set to become wider in the coming years and even risking of being overtaken by countries like Thailand, Vietnam and even Indonesia!

The time-line for the announcement of the new economic model has been repeatedly deferred, from last year to the beginning of this year, then to this month to coincide with the completion of Najib as Prime Minister and now finally to June when the 10th Malaysia Plan will be presented to Parliament with the NEM to be revealed later this month for public feedback.

The disruption of the plan to announce the new economic model to commemorate Najib’s first year as Prime Minister is a setback for Najib’s 1Malaysia as well as a competitive and innovative new economic model and a success for the plethora of Neo-NEP Umnoputra NGOs and NGIs to whom have been outsourced the agenda of Umno’s NEP-putras.

Malaysians and the world are wondering what new economic model of greater innovation, creativity and competitiveness could be formulated by Najib against the backdrop of reactionary and extremist pressures with irresponsible and baseless alarms like “the Chinese community will take over the country in the next general elections” and that Article 153 of the Constitution would be trampled upon with Malay interests (when they mean Neo-NEP Umnoputra interests) sidelined.

It is also pertinent to ask how Najib could inspire confidence in the Malaysia 2.0 new economic model when he has done nothing in the past year as Prime Minister to stop the brain drain of Malaysia’s talents abroad or to achieve brain gain.

One of the specific proposals made by the World Bank three years ago for Malaysia to migrate to a new economic model Malaysia 2.0 was: “Engaging and attracting back talented, experienced, wealthy and well-connected members of Malaysian diaspora”.

If Najib is incapable of checking Malaysia’s braindrain which had led to the emigration of two generations of the best and brightest overseas as to create a two-million-strong Malaysian diaspora in the world, how can the Prime Minister succeed in achieving “brain gain” or to reverse “brain drain” from the Malaysian diaspora?

It is not only non-Malays but more and more Malays have also joined the emigration trail.

I still remember the ambitious “brain gain” programme of the Eighth Malaysia Plan ten years ago to “reverse brain drain” to transform Malaysia into a K-economy and Information Society through a two-pronged strategy, viz:

  • An annual “brain gain” of 5,000 “extraordinary world citizens of extraordinary talent” to “lure the best brains regardless of race or nationality, from Bangalore to California”; and
  • Encourage 500 skilled Malaysians overseas every year to return home with their expertise from 2001.

This ambitious “brain gain” programme was an unmitigated failure – with Malaysia losing even more talents in the past decade.

Malaysia is not short of proposals for a new economic model Malaysia 2.0 but what is sorely lacking is the political will to implement them.

How can Najib ensure that the new economic model of Malaysia 2.0 to be announced by him will not fail because of the lack of political will to carry out far-reaching government transformation programmes including restoring national and international confidence in the key national institutions and the system of governance in Malaysia?

[Speech (7) by DAP Parliamentary Leader and MP for Ipoh Timor Lim Kit Siang in Dewan Rakyat on the Royal Address on Thursday, 18th March 2010]

A nice way of putting it.

I have written about the failure of our education system in my earlier posts. Please click on my “education” category.

Our ‘rempitised’ education system

Monday, 15 March 2010 

 
 

My definition: Rempitism (noun; also concept and ideology borrow from the neo-Malay word rempit) – a Malaysian phenomenon in which youth uses the public road system to break the speed limit with customised motorbikes in illegal, past-midnight drag-races that rob the restful sleep of peaceful citizens; a phenomena akin to a capitalist economy of a struggling showcasing Third Word nation such a Malaysia that hypermodernises beyond the ability of its people to cope with its sensationalised designs of ‘economic miracles’.

A REPUBLIC OF VIRTUE

Azly Rahman

on facebook: http://www.facebook.compeople/AzlyRahman/689079971
on blog: http://azlyrahman-illuminations.blogspot.com/

Both phenomena rest upon idiotic pride and arrogance that endanger a peaceful, ethical and sustainable future. Both present clear and present danger on the equally dangerous highway of globalisation. See also rempitise (adjective) and Mat Rempit (special noun).

A ‘rempitised’ economic and education system ‘rams’ human beings into different ‘pits’ (hence the term ‘rempit’) of the conveyer belt of the capitalist production system; creating what looks like a natural progression of meritocracy in education and social evolution. The foundation of this system is neo-colonialism, structural violence and the alienation of labour.

(Note: Like participants in the global rat race, Mat Rempit always want to finish first in the deadly race and be the first to do a wheelie for the world to see.)

Is our public education system failing? Is it producing more and more Mat Rempit, Anak Abu (anak-anak angkatan bawah usia), bohsia (bawah usia or the under-aged girls), bohjan (jantan bawah usia or under-aged males), gangsta rappers, hip-hoppers and youth alienated and put at-risk by our education system?

Are we creating class systems in education the way we have created varying types of classrooms that correspond to different classes in society? Why are we seeing the tuition industry becoming a billion-ringgit business, helping our children memorising more and more but understanding less and less of what they learn?

Do we have people in the education ministry well versed enough in analysing the phenomenon of our rempitised economy (speeding it up illegally) and how this is directly related to how we are ‘schooling’ our society?

Do we now have an entire system of higher education inheriting the children of our rempitised economy and contributing to the low quality of graduates – who cannot think critically and are always subjected to the whims and fancies of a totalitarian regime only interested in tightening the stranglehold on our universities?

British and American scholars like Paul Willis, Henry Levin, Peter McLaren and Martin Carnoy who studied the phenomena of schooling in capitalist societies observed the nature of the learning process in countries in which the rapid and unreflective industrialisation and post-industrialisation process have created one-dimensional citizens out of youth.

Schooling teaches these children to become good and obedient workers in a economic system that reduce the larger population into labour, while enriching the upper class into people and property-owners in a rempitised economy.

What’s lacking in teachers

Is our education ministry training teachers well in urban education and in the schooling of our at-risk youth? Do we actually know the root cause of rempitism and gangsterism in schools, and are we able to design better learning systems for those who are already marginalised and left behind by our rempitised economy?

I have a sense that the cases of gangsterism and bullying of teachers will continue to increase. More private schools will be built and Malaysians will lose confidence in their public schools. More private schools mean more divisions in society. The rich will produce better schools and the poor will be left behind in this rempitised system we have all created in the name of the New Economic Policy.

Teachers do not have the necessary concepts and skills to deal not only with the Millennial children (high-tech, high gadgetry, low attention span, low school-tolerance) but also the rempitised children who have low skills of reading, writing and computing.

Children left behind will be those who become Mat and Minah Rempit. They will be destructive to the classroom process and will translate their social anger into counter-productive and destructive activities. These are the ones who will be made criminals as a result of an uncaring education system that criminalises the human mind by placing unmotivated, uncreative and unprepared teachers to develop the untapped geniuses in our classrooms.

Should we rename the Mat and Minah Rempit as Mat Cemerlang (Excellent/Glorious Ones) as suggested by an Umno leader? Should we build a racing circuit for them to continue drag racing?

I do not think we should. I think those who propose such names and measures of glorification need radical counseling and education on the meaning of education. I think it shows a clear lack of understanding of the root of the problem. Wrong diagnosis of social ill.

Rehabilitation programme

I think we should beef up the highway police force and stop illegal drag racing, round up the Mat Rempit and send them for six-month rehabilitation in rempit camps near Perlis, guarded by graduates of the National Service. We should build a somewhat safe motor-cross clearings/zones and let them drag-race happily in these areas until they are exhausted.

In between these sessions we ought to give them a good and safe motorcycle education so that they will understand what it means to ride safely and not endanger the life of others. We can have the Biro Tata Negara write the module so that good indoctrination programmes will be used more on these rempitised and rempitising youth instead of those who do not need to be indoctrinated into any form of totalitarianism.

Peace-loving, rest-needing, night-sleeping citizens affected by the activities of rempitism will appreciate this radical programme of reconfiguring the mind of the rempitised youth.

How to de-rempitise our schools

In the meantime, how do we deal with the leadership of the public education system? We need to start by selecting only those who are well-versed in the entire spectrum of education.

We have ministers, educational experts, specialists and educational representatives who either have minimal classroom experience or none at all – let alone have much-needed knowledge in the history, theory, post-structurality and possibilities of education.

We place them in this ministry based on political considerations. They mess things up and show their inability to understand where our youth are heading, or how to design an education system good enough to reflect the dream we have – a dream of a just, equitable, environmentally sustainable, intellectual and ethical society.

We are more concerned with having our students and teachers pledge blind loyalty to the signs and symbols of power; one-dimensional thinking; and politically correct behaviour instead of developing, celebrating and further grooming good teachers who can radicalise the minds of the youth of tomorrow.

We force our university students to ceremoniously recite the Pledge of Loyalty, and round on those who protest against corruption and social injustice.

We do this against the backdrop of our speeded-up, hypermodernised economy – one we rempitised in the name of the New Economic Policy.

The question for us now is: how do we de-rempitise our society?

OUR USUAL REMINDE