Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

Racism/Quality & Transfers

2 weeks ago we had 2 principals asking the non-Malays to go back to their forefather’s country and now we have a police officer who have said the same thing! I wonder where this country is heading to…….. This incident below clearly tells us the standard of English among our civil servants. Basically this police officer do not understand English and asked the complainant to speak in BM. This is a common phenomenon now. I had many teachers who were my patients but were unable to speak English when I explain to them in English. The best part was when I asked them what subject are they teaching in school, answer : Maths/Science!!! Aren’t this subject thought in English!

What happened to the 2 principals? Well, I heard one was transferred to office work and the other is on leave till completion of investigations. Why is it taking so long to take any action against these individuals? In our bloated civil service, it is a common phenomenon that any non-performing staffs are just transferred to another department. He/She receives the same salary but got to do lesser amount of jobs. Subsequently he/she will be promoted as anyone else based on seniority of service rather than performance. This is the reason why our civil service is rotting away, coupled with poor product of our education system.

I just had a retired ex-senior nurse who told me above the misery she has to undergo at a first class ward of a government hospital. Medications not served, no proper nursing and totally no caring attitude from the current generation of nurses! This is not a common findings if you are in a government hospital nowadays, poor quality of nurses. This retired nurse just asked me one question ” This happened to me in a first class ward, i wonder what the patients are undergoing in the 3rd class ward!” . I share the same feelings with her. Imagine, you can become a nurse with just 3 credits in SPM nowadays! What quality do you expect? And it is happening everywhere in our country. That is the reason why the FDI is dropping as we can’t provide enough human resource for any companies who wants to invest in this country. The good and hardworking ones will leave the country as they can’t tolerated these non-sense!

Sunday September 5, 2010

Racism: Cop under probe

By ANDREW SAGAYAM
saggy@thestar.com.my

KUALA LUMPUR: A police inspector who allegedly told a 51-year-old snatch theft victim to “balik China” (return to China) if she could not speak Bahasa Malaysia is being investigated.

City police chief DCP Datuk Muhammad Sabtu Osman said the inspector, in his 30s, was from the Sentul district police headquarters. He is being investigated by the city police headquarters disciplinary committee headed by the Chief Police Officer.

The officer, who is attached to the Criminal Investigation Depart­ment, has been temporarily relieved of his duties pending investigations. He is now handling administrative work.

He allegedly made the remark to housewife Loh See Moi, who was a snatch theft victim on Aug 24 in Kepong.

“The police force will not defend and protect any policemen, if they are guilty of wrongdoing,” said DCP Muhammad Sabtu.

Loh, from Selayang, lodged a police report against the inspector at the Jinjang police station yesterday, alleging that he had uttered these words: “Jika tak tahu cakap Bahasa Melayu, balik China” (go back to China if you can’t speak Bahasa Malaysia).

In her report, Loh said she had gone to the Kepong police station accompanied by her daughter Fong Ay Lian, 26, to lodge a report following the snatchtheft.

She said at the inspector’s office, her daughter spoke to the officer in English but he refused to entertain her as she was not the complainant.

Then as Loh began to relate her ordeal in English, the inspector made the remark.

Loh said she asked him in Bahasa Malaysia why he made the remark, saying that she was a Malaysian.

DCP Muhammad urged the public to lodge a report or complaint with their respective district police chiefs if they encountered problems with policemen or officers.

“I will be very disappointed if the allegations against my officer are true. We will investigate the matter thoroughly,’’ he added.

Read Full Post »

This was an interesting article written by Azmi Sharom in the Star today. Malaysia is probably the only country in the world who still practises institutionalised racism! Quotas everywhere which is not based on needs but based on skin colour and race. Since when Bumi discounts of houses became a Malay right! It is not stated anywhere in the constitution, as what PERKASA claims. Tun Razak introduced this discount scheme to encourage Malays to buy houses, especially in towns but unfortunately, as I said before, anything that is too long is detrimental. Now it has become a Malay right!. Remember, NEP was clearly drafted to last for only 20 years but now it is being hijacked by the Malay elites to benefit them. As what Tony Pua said, why a person who can buy a house worth RM500 000, need a discount? Why a person who earns millions as a director need scholarship for his children?This is what I call total misuse of the system. God is watching!

Stand up and be counted, Malaysia

Brave New World (The Star)
26 August 2010

It is strange that in the 21st century, we are still having to face the problem of institutionalised racism.

______________________________

OVER the past week or so, there have been some developments in our country which are more disturbing than usual.
In particular, the two cases of alleged racist remarks by school heads; the accusations that Penang mosques have replaced the Yang di-Pertuan Agong with the Chief Minister’s name in their prayers; and the continued insistence that Article 153 of the Constitution is equal to an inalienable right that could not be questioned.
These events are interrelated and it seems to me that they indicate that there is a battle of ideology going on in the country now.
On one side is the idea that a person’s ethnicity and religion entitles him to be treated better than anyone else who is different. On the other side is the idea that equality is an aspiration that is both noble and necessary for nation building.
It is strange that in the 21st century we are still having to face the problem of institutionalised racism.
Looking at our history, one can see why this has occurred. The combination of race-based politics and poorly interpreted constitutional provisions have meant that the idea of racial and religious superiority has been allowed to grow and become the norm rather than something undesirable and out of the ordinary.
How else can one explain the possibility that teachers, the very people to whom we entrust the education of our children, can have such warped values and also have the gall to express those views publicly?
How else can we explain the near rabid attack on the Penang Chief Minister for something which he and the state religious department have vehemently denied and in fact would have been insane to attempt?
Let’s analyse this one step at a time. When the dominant political parties in this country do not have any political ideology to speak of and are instead, based on the principle that each race-based component has a duty to safeguard the interest of its community, what one has is a recipe for the kind of policy and rhetoric that divides rather than unites.
Historically, one can see the reasons why the politics of the nation was forged in this way. It was a necessary evil in the face of the divide-and-rule policy by the British to show that even when separate, the three major communities of the nation can still work together politically.
However, it is an unsustainable model and what started life as a fairly rosy example of racial cooperation too easily descended into crude racialist type politics.
Which is why the early aspirations that our founding fathers had for a society treated with equality has now been all but buried by the idea that one race is superior to others and in fact is the only race with any right to be here in Malaysia.
This is because in the battlefields of politics, it is easiest to appeal to base racialist emotions, especially when without those types of ideas, a party based on race will have no collateral to work with.
In this kind of political atmosphere, it is of no surprise that what has been forgotten is that the basis of this nation was one of justice and equality. And the document that is meant to protect that, the Federal Constitution, has been misinterpreted to the extent that there is no longer any trace of this aspiration in the mainstream discourse of the day.
Let us be absolutely clear on this matter, the Constitution does give powers to the government to take affirmative action and it does acknowledge the fact that Islam has a special place in the public life of the nation.
What it does not intend to do however is create a perpetual system of ethnic-based favourable treatment nor does it advocate the idea that all other religious beliefs must be subservient to Islam.
However, instead of this reasonable position, what we have today is the idea that affirmative action for Malays is unquestionable and to be continued in perpetuity becoming the norm.
This cannot be further from the truth as there are no legal justification for it at all.
Article 153 of the Federal Constitution is seen as the holy grail for those who hold this view. However, if we examine the provision closely we will notice two things.
Firstly, affirmative action is not a Malay right. Article 153 does not endow a right. What it does is to merely give government the power to take affirmative action despite the overarching ideal of equality which is enshrined in Article 8 of the Constitution.
To support this contention, we see that Article 8 clearly states that all citizens in this country are equal except for situations specifically provided for in the Constitution. Those “specific provisions” are found in Article 153 and there are not many of them.
They include the power to establish quotas for the civil service, permits and licences, scholarships and education.
Therefore anything other than these areas should not be subjected to affirmative action.
Furthermore, any affirmative action has to be reasonable. The idea of what is reasonable must surely be open to research and debate otherwise there will always be the risk of abuse and wastage of resources.
This being the case, although questioning the existence of such a power to have affirmative action is moot, discussion on the efficacy of affirmative action policies and programmes surely is not.
The way the discourse is today, and not merely by the racialist fringe but by mainstream politicians in power, is that even the implementation of Article 153 is not to be questioned at all.
This is surely wrong based both on the meaning of the Constitution as well as the principle held by the founding fathers that Article 153 was an unfortunate but necessary aberration from the ideals of equality and that it was to be used not in perpetuity.
With these kinds of distortion of law, is it any wonder then that we still get people actually classifying whole swathes of the citizenry as having no right to be here?
Is it any wonder then that a crazy accusation against a Chief Minister whose government has given twice as much money to the Islamic bodies in the state than the previous administration, can give rise to the belief that he is a threat to the faith?
If this country is to have any future as a true nation, the time has come for those who believe in the ideals of equality, ideals which were held by the political founding fathers of the country as well as the traditional Rulers of that time, to stand up and be counted.
To not be cowed by the bigots and to say that this is our country and it stands on noble humanitarian ideals, not opportunistic racialist thinking.

Read Full Post »

MM:Life in the Malay Utopia

This is an excellent write-up by Mariam Mokhtar(below).

Well, Ibrahim Ali and the UMNO goons have asked the non-Malays to go back wherever they came from. I have said this before, that there will come a time when the population of non-Malays will be less than 10% in Malaysia. I predict this will happen sooner than expected, probably by 2050. I may not be around by that time or probably still around but in some other country, perhaps!
I would love to see where this country will be at that point of time and how the Malays will be cheating their own race and the widening gap of the rich and the poor Malays, which is already happening. 
I just hope the Orang Asli’s will say the same to Ibrahim Ali, Najib Razak,  Ahmad Ismail , the school headmistress etc etc to go back to the Indonesian islands!
 
They screw up this country and keep using the non-Malays as their punching bag to divert the attention. Fighting for Malay rights konon, pooooooooooooooooooodah…………………………
  
Life in the Malay Utopia
//
Mariam Mokhtar
Aug 23, 10
12:59pm

If Tunku Abdul Rahman were alive today, he would weep at the destruction of bridges he had built between the races in Malaysia.

In a speectunku abdul rahmanh to the Foreign Correspondents Association in May 1961, he warned us about “a small minority who did not think, feel, believe and work for the good of Malaya”. Referring to national unity, he said: “This goal would not be achieved if the Chinese continued to think and talk of everything Chinese.”

Ironically, some Malays and a misguided Chinese convert have let the Tunku down, while the non-Malays have embraced his vision wholeheartedly.

The Tunku was passionate about loyalty: “We, who are here, have only our little Malaya. The Chinese, Malays and others have to make the best of our home here. Malaya, our one and only home”. He explained that without unity, “there would be conflict and hell will break loose”.

Fast forward to 2010 and the two school principals who allegedly told their Chinese students to “return to China”. They’ve aped the anti-Chinese rhetoric of Ibrahim Ali, Ahmad Ismail and Ridhuan Tee Abdullah. They are egged-on by a former prime minister, who refuses to retire gracefully, and whose constant meddling will destroy this country. 

barisan nasional rais yatimNot content at being sidelined, Information, Communication and Culture Minister Rais Yatim has condemned the MCA president for demanding the gradual reduction of the 30 percent bumiputera economic equity.

However, let’s forget about 30 percent bumiputera equity.

Let’s imagine a ‘Ketuanan Melayu Utopia’ with 100 percent Malay bumiputera equity, with all the Chinese ‘banished’ to China and the Indians to India.

Will we be socially, economically, morally and religiously content, in Malay brotherhood?

In this Utopia, will the handful of individuals who used to control the wealth of the nation, relinquish their economic stranglehold and share it?

Their actions could eradicate poverty across the country and lift the economic status of the Malays, especially the rural Malays.

But I doubt that they will give up control and power.

Will the government-linked companies or the companies ‘belonging’ to powerful politicians share projects with the other 97 percent of the population? Would projects be put to open tender? Would the Ali Baba companies that used to exist be disbanded? Or will clones of these Ali Baba firms emerge?

Lifestyle changes?

How will our schools fare? Teachers, especially principals, need not go into racist rants. Will bullying and harassment manifest itself in other forms?

Out will go the subject called ‘Moral’ for the non-Malays. Sports, especially for girls, would probably cease; Westernised activities like boy-scouts or girl-guides would stop.

As music is Pakistan imposes syariah law religious school studentsanathema to Muslim teachings, unless they are nasyid songs, students who appreciate music and want to learn a musical instrument would have to stop harbouring foolish ideas.

There will be even less emphasis on English. A nephew at a Mara boarding school tried to improve his English, by speaking English to his friends. Unfortunately, both his schoolmates and teachers teased him, “Kamu-ni action-nya, nak jadi Mat-Salleh kah?” (Why are you showing off, do you want to be a Westerner?) so he stopped.

With universities attended and staffed by Malays only, standards should be expected to rise, because there is no competition to slow them down and distract them.

With this new Ketuanan Melayu Utopia, there will be open season on polygamy. Men will be able to marry whenever and whoever they like. There will be no equality for women.

A man can opt to marry girls as soon as they reach the age of puberty. He can get around the laws prohibiting sex with a minor, by marrying in Malacca. When he tires of her, there is always the option of a second, third or fourth wife.

He need not worry about his children’s welfare, or breakdown of the family-unit, as the courts rarely enforce maintenance payments. Women being responsible mothers, will always work harder, to subsidise his lifestyle and support his family.

Places that used to sell alcohoalcohol banl, and entertainment establishments like nightclubs or karaoke bars, will cease to exist and ‘social ills’ should disappear. The ‘moral police’ who used to look for drinkers like Kartika, may be downsized. Unemployment figures could rise as a result.

Will the khalwat squads still turn a blind eye to immoral VIPs? Having a 100 percent Malay nation will not stop illicit sex.

As there will be no more Gregorian New Year and Valentine’s day celebrations, there will be no more abandoned babies.

How will the Malays decide between employment in the cushy civil service or a job in the private sector? Will the government machinery become leaner and more efficient?

Identity, cultural crises

With religious fervor, will the Malays become fully Arabicised or Islamicised? Our Malay architectural heritage has long been abandoned for Arabic domes.

The kebaya has bmalay muslim islam womeneen usurped by the jubah. Tudung or mini-telekung have replaced ordinary head scarves. Even Malay men parade in white Arab robes. War memorials are banned and logos on football jerseys are subject to scrutiny.

Malay weddings have long since become politically correct and institutionalised. Apart from the customary vulgar display of wealth, there is no more joget or mingling among guests. Men and women have neglected how to behave in each other’s presence because of segregation. Basically, everyone has forgotten how to have fun.

The Malays are suffering from an identity and cultural crisis. They are stuck in a time-warp and refuse to move with the times. They lack a strong leader. They have been held back by leaders who do not understand their needs but who were content to use them indiscriminately. Malays have been conditioned to be suspicious of each other and kept in check by fear.

All the Ibrahim Alis, azlanAhmad Ismails, Ridhuan Tee Abdullahs and racist school-principals of Malaysia are simply ‘dark-skinned’ neo-Nazis. If these ‘pseudo Aryans’ believe that 100 percent bumiputera equity, or banishing non-Malays from Malaysia will improve our social and economic outcomes, then their heads need examination.

When their experiment for a 100 percent Malay nation-state fails to lift the rural Malays out of poverty and creates a wider gap between rich and poor Malays, what then? When their ill-conceived ‘social-engineering’ creates more Malay disunity, who will they blame?

In our Malay Utopia, will Dr Mahathir Mohamad be sent back to Kerala, will Ridhuan Tee be returned to China and will the other ‘Indonesian Malays’ like Dr Mohd Khir Toyo and Najib Abdul Razak be sent packing?

//

 

MARIAM MOKHTAR is a non-conformist traditionalist from Perak, a bucket chemist and an armchair eco-warrior. In ‘real–speak’, this translates into that she comes from Ipoh, values change but respects culture, is a petroleum chemist and also an environmental pollution-control scientist.

 

Read Full Post »

This is an interesting write-up by AB Sulaiman. Very well written.

No flag-waving on Merdeka Day

//
AB Sulaiman
Aug 19, 10
12:18pm
Share 17

COMMENT August 31st is coming and our leaders are already instigating all of us to show our patriotism, loyalty, love and respect for our beloved nation by way of planting the Jalur Gemilang everywhere – on our car top, roof of our homes and factory or office buildings.

NONEI did not do it last year or the year before.

I am not inclined to do so this year either for I am suffering from a disease known as ‘malangitis’. I just coined this word, so don’t bother looking up the dictionary for its meaning.

It’s from the word malang or bad luck or cursed in Malay. It infers sakit Ketuanan Melayu, thus the cursed Ketuanan Melayu disease. I am having the bad luck of suffering from the excesses of the Ketuanan Melayu leadership as they run the country, so I won’t be in a festive mood come Merdeka Day.

Apparently malangitis took root when the Malay leadership took absolute control over the running of the country after the May 13th 1969 debacle. 

The Malays were like the proverbial hungry fishermen among other not-so-hungry ones.

The leaders meaningfully wanted to preserve the honour and dignity of the Malays by formulating and instituting policies that would catapult the Malays into the not-so-hungry fishermen category; into the Malaysian economic mainstream.

NONESo they did what had been thought a wonderful idea – by giving the Malays a lot of fish. But of course for a limited period of twenty years, according to its architect, the second PM, Abdul Razak Hussein (right).

In other words by 1990 they wanted to see the Malays in control of thirty percent of the Malays from a very low two. We all know the name of the policy is the NEP.

But giving fish to a bunch of hungry fishermen has proven to be a short-sighted way of solving the problem. Better had they been given some materials like wood, some tools like axes, saws, nails, ropes, threads and such and teach them how to make boats and nets. They would soon be able to fish again! It’s a sustainable solution so they won’t be hungry ever again!

This would amount to changing a mindset, of jumping out of the paradigm box.

But changing the mindset is a tough exercise. It requires a good injection of technical knowledge, skill, ability and experience, and quite possibly involves a lot of sacrifice and hard work.

It takes a lot of time too, not to mention good old fashioned luck. More importantly perhaps, it takes a lot of mental attitude to want to jump out of the box, to change, in the first place. A quick fix might provide short term relief to a deep-seated problem but not sustainable long-term ones.
 
Stagnant level

Well, we all know that the targeted twenty years had passed by and Malay involvement in the economy had been, well, lacklustre – at 18.9 percent in 1990 and apparently at this stagnant level in around 2005 by the government’s own admission. I am wondering what the figure is now.

And here came the first symptom of malangitis. In 1990 the leaders did not call the country’s stakeholders (that’s us) in the country to sit down, have a close look and analysis at the situation, and to come up with some fresh ways of going forward.

Had they done so, at this point they might discover the truth that the Malays might have the wish to change but have not got the mental and technical wherewithal, capability, and the courage to undertake painful sacrifices beyond just hard work. Appropriate plans and programmes would have been formulated.

But instead the leaders did not even have the intelligence to seek feedback. They went on doing exactly what they have been doing in the past twenty years: continue with the (already proven) ineffective quick fix. They gave the Malays more and more fish!

Since then and for two decades now, the country went into a tailspin.

Well, well. All modern pundits and philosophers say that we all must learn from our mistakes for if we don’t we are bound to repeat it. And repeat it we have. We are now paying the price for our folly.

For a start democracy has become a dirty word. It used to be the system of government of the people by the people and for the people, but now to a system of government of BN, by Umno and for the Malays.

It used to be a system of rule of law but now it’s rule by law (i.e. for private individuals). It used to be a system where justice and fairness is the norm, and where meritocracy is supreme.

Now it is a system of autocracy where cronyism and nepotism are rife.

The government prestige and reputation has reached new lows. Just witness the following comment expressed by a FairMind on a report regarding the sudden presentation of a purported ‘note’ by the AG’s Chambers in the Teoh Beng Hock case, which I take liberty to quote:

mongolian woman bombed altantuya 081106“In Malaysia, we have the immigration department obliterating Altantuya’s (left) immigration records, the government hospital’s doctor doctoring Kugan’s post mortem record, the military covering up for the lost jet engine, the AG, PDRM and the MACC fabricating evidence for the powers-that-be, the judges acquitting the crooks and BN cronies, the customs close one eye on politicians and royalties, etc. Not only thieves and robbers are involved in dishonesty any more; in Malaysia even the government does it – yes, big time! Can we believe in the government any more?”

Belligerent tone

As a people, the Malays were becoming arrogant. Leaders like Ahmad Ismail are known to have said publicly that “If you don’t the country, just leave”. Others say something like “Don’t test our patience”, again on the principle of quick fix, albeit on a belligerent tone.

Others, many others, wave the kris menacingly in the air to dramatise and underscore their perceived grievances against the (more stable and rational) non-Malay population.

Meanwhile any and every Malay would make full use of the fact that the Malays are in control; they make full use of the might is right principle of government knowing that Big Brother is lending total support. Any and every article that smells of anti-government, anti-religion and anti-Agong sentiments would be declared ‘seditious’.

As such a police report at the very least would be made against the author. Helen Ang suffers from this case when Perkasa Youth chief Arman Azhar Abu Hanifah launched a police report against her partly for expressing anti-Agong sentiments.

NONE(But when Tun Mahathir Mohamad amended the constitution in an obvious anti-monarchy binge in 1993, well… that is ok; perhaps Perkasa was not yet around).

The imams or ulama too were becoming arrogant. They make the claim that this country is constitutionally an Islamic state (which it is not), and then force their archaic versions of Islamic values to well nigh everyone. Under this ambit suddenly S Banggarma (right), a Hindu from birth, found herself caged as a Muslim!

But at least she is still alive. Recently two unfortunate souls jumped out from the window of their respective apartments when the morality police came knocking; they were inside with their female partners. They died upon hitting ground several floors below.

The questions here are: is it justifiable for the morality police to be watchful over private morality? Are they not in some way culpable for any physical injury including death in their pursuit of upholding morality? I believe somehow that they are and at the very least an inquest should have been organised. In the event I did not detect any expression of remorse or regret on the part of the causers of these unfortunate loss of life.

NONEThe civil servants, another ‘branch’ of the Ketuanan Melayu leadership, too have their arrogance or misplaced philosophies.

Sidek Hassan (right), the chief secretary to the government said in a Malaysiakini interview that civil servants “have to be loyal” to the government of the day because “the government serves the people… the government have to be answerable to the people”.

He is absolutely correct at this point.

But he added “And if the government thinks that the best way to serve (the people) is to do it in a certain way, as civil servants we follow what the government tells us to do,” which effectively nullifies his first point.

Civil servants should stand up against any excesses shown by the government for their loyalty must always be directed to their paymasters, the people.

String of Cs

I have listed string of Cs prevailing in the country which demonstrating other symptoms of malangitis in my previous article, some of them being confusion, contradiction, conflict, and coercion in describing the social political and economic environment.

In this current writing consider this following case to illustrate two of the many Cs, confusion and contradiction, the case of the touted ‘The Government Transformation Programme’, otherwise known as ‘1Malaysia’.

Apparently the goal of 1Malaysia is “a nation where, it is hoped, every Malaysian perceives himself or herself as Malaysian first, and by race, religion, geographical region or socio-economic background second”.

It was a definition clear and concise, even a reasonable secondary schoolboy could or would understand what this means. We were all geared to internalize this worthwhile mission.

But when DPM Muhyiddin Yasin was asked about his stand on this vital issue he insisted that he is ‘Malay first’! He continued with by now famous “How can I say I’m Malaysian first and Malay second? All the Malays will shun me… and it’s not proper.”

NONEThen take the case of the august YB Mustapa Mohamed (right) speaking at a press conference on Aug 7 after opening a 10th Malaysia Plan seminar at a hotel in Kuala Lumpur.

Apparently he mentioned that the people, especially Malays, should not disregard the NEP because it has brought about “many achievements” since its inception in 1971. It breaks my heart when I hear that Malays say they don’t need the NEP,” he apparently said further.

He cleverly did not say that many Malays are essentially tired not of the original principles and visions of NEP but on the inability to respond adequately psychologically to the changing demands, to the subsequent abuse of its implementation (like nepotism), and to the endemic corruption it has brought along.

Affirmative action

Mustapa then talked about the non-bumiputeras having to accept the reality that Malays have rights to affirmative action, that the dignity, pride and honour of the Malay must be protected.

A series of confusion immediately here for he mentioned two famous words – rights and reality. Rights and reality? What rights and what reality?

Is it the right to steal and plunder the nation’s treasury? Or to smash into pieces public institutions like education (and producing graduates who could not interact) and the judiciary (where we revert to tribal laws)?

Or, fragmenting of the people into bumis and non-bumis, filthy rich and dirt poor Malays, Muslims and non-Muslims? Between open-minded freedom-loving and close-minded mentally enslaved citizens?

jalur gemilang 090905Or, FDI to dwindle by 89 percent in 2009 alone and with Mustapa saying not to worry, this is ok? Or, the running away of domestic capital abroad? Or the more than 300,000 talented, experienced, knowledgeable and trained people running away to other climes in the last two years? Are these the rights and reality Mustapa mentioned in the pursuit and preservation of Malay dignity and honour?

Hang Tuah wouldn’t agree to this, nor would Tun Abdul Razak, or the ordinary well-meaning but manipulated Malay mainstream.

In the meantime my acute malangitis prevents me from planting the jalur gemilang come this August 31st.

 

//

 

AB SULAIMAN is an observer of human traits and foibles, especially within the context of religion and culture. As a liberal, he marvels at the way orthodoxy fights to maintain its credibility in a devilishly fast-changing world. He hopes to provide some understanding to the issues at hand and wherever possible, suggest some solutions. He holds a Bachelor in Social Sciences (Leicester, UK) and a Diploma in Public Administration, Universiti Malaya.

 

Read Full Post »

I was stuck in a traffic jam on the LDP last week. Nothing moved for half an hour when suddenly a man knocks on my window. So I roll down my window and ask, “What’s going on?”

”Terrorists down the road have kidnapped  a few UMNO politicians. They’re asking for a  RM10 million ransom or they’re going to douse them with petrol and set them on fire.  We are going from car to car, taking up a collection.”

I innocently asked, “How much is everyone giving on average..?”

“Most people are giving about a gallon”

Read Full Post »

This is a good speech by a Malay from Singapore. I have worked in Singapore before and what I can see is that there is no special preference for anybody in Singapore. Everything is done by fair and transparent manner. If you are poor, you get everything free, including healthcare and education. The race that benefits the most are the Malays since they are still the lowest socioeconomic group but definitely better than the Malays in Malaysia. But as what this article says, they are independent, good, speaks good english and able to compete globally.

I have seen Malays in Singapore in top positions of multinational companies, Malays who are married to foreigners and staying in US etc etc. Even though they form the minority in Singapore, they are abundant of them in Singapore’s civil service which is the opposite from what is happening in this country of ours!

As the writer has clearly said , crutch mentality only makes you “manja” and “malas”……………………. and forgot “Ketuanan Melayu!”………………

The Malays in Singapore – no crutch mentality

 

(Speech by Berita Harian Singapore editor Guntor Sadali, at the Berita Harian Singapore Achiever of the Year Awards ceremony on July 28, 2010)

It is a fact known to all that Malays in Singapore are a minority.

However this minority is quite different from other minorities in the world.

Similarly, to some, Singapore is just a red dot in this vast Asian region.

But it is no ordinary red dot.

It is a grave mistake to equate size with ability, just as it is wrong to assume that being small and in the minority is to be weak and insignificant.

The recent World Cup proved this. While Spain may be the world champion, it was minnow Switzerland that became the only country in the tournament that was able to defeat Spain.

Forty-five years have passed since Singapore left Malaysia, yet every now and then we still hear non-complimentary comments from across the Causeway about the Malay community here.

The latest came from former Malaysian Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad, who casually reminded Malaysian Malays not to become like Singaporean Malays.

He did not make it clear what he actually meant, but the comment was made in the context of the possibility of Malaysian Malays losing their power in Malaysia.

Again he did not specify what type of power, but it could safely be interpreted as political power.

Now, what could have happened to the Malays here in the last four decades?

What could have driven Dr Mahathir to voice his concern and to caution the Malaysian Malays?

I wonder.

The Malay community in Singapore, of course, know what has become of us here.

First and foremost, we have become a completely different community from what we were 45 years ago.

We have developed our own identity and philosophy of life that are distinct from our relatives across the Causeway.

We may wear the same clothes, eat the same food, speak the same language and practise the same culture.

However, the similarities end there.

We are now a society that upholds the philosophy of wanting to stand on our own feet, or what is known in Malay as ‘berdikari’ or ‘berdiri atas kaki sendiri’.

We do not believe in being spoon-fed or being too dependent on government help.

In other words, we do not have a crutch mentality.We firmly believe that a community with such a crutch mentality will soon become a “two M” community – the first ‘M’ stands for ‘manja’ (spoilt), and the second for ‘malas’ (lazy).

We definitely do not want to be labelled as a pampered and lazy community.

That is why our Malay community here constantly work hard to raise funds to build our own mosques, madrasahs and other buildings in expensive and land-scarce Singapore.

Over the years we have raised millions of dollars to become proud owners of these buildings.

Through our own efforts and with the help of other organisations, we have also helped the needy not only financially, but also in equipping them with new skills so that they can earn their living.

For Dr Mahathir, however, all that we have done and achieved so far are not good enough.

He takes a negative view of our changed attitudes and different mindset, and has therefore cautioned Malaysian Malays not to be like us.

What about power? For Malays in Singapore, power is not about wielding the keris.

For us, knowledge is power. In fact we believe that knowledge is THE real power.

The constant emphasis by the community on the importance of education and acquiring knowledge has led to the formation of institutions such as Mendaki, Association of Muslim Professionals (AMP), the Prophet Mohamad Birthday Memorial Scholarship Board (LBKM) and many others.

These self-help organisations not only provide financial help to needy students, but also strive to nuture our students to their full potential.

At the same time, these organisations help to tackle various social ills faced by the community.

Again, we do these all on our own. Malay children here attend the same schools as other Singaporeans with a shared aim – to obtain a holistic education and, of course, achieve good examination results.

Yes, it is tough. Like all other children, our Malay students have no choice but to work hard.

It is a reality of life in Singapore that we have come to accept – that there is certainly no short cut to success.

We do not believe in getting any special treatment, because it would only reduce the value of our achievements and lower our dignity.

The meritocratic system that we practise here is, without doubt, a tough system but it helps us to push ourselves and prevent us from becoming ‘manja’ and ‘malas’.

Still, Dr Mahathir and some Malay leaders across the Causeway do not like the way we do things here and have therefore warned Malaysian Malays not to be like us.

On our part, there is certainly no turning back.

Meritocracy has proven to be a good and fair system.

It pushes us to work hard and makes us proud of our achievements.

We can see how it has benefited us by looking at the growing number of doctors, lawyers, magistrates, engineers, corporate leaders and other professionals among us.

It is the successes and achievements of some of these people that Berita Harian wants to highlight and celebrate when we launched this Achiever Award 12 years ago.

Tonight, we have another role model to present to our community.

So, the question is: Shouldn’t our friends and relatives across the Causeway be like us – Malays in Singapore?

It is definitely not for us to suggest or decide.

And we too have no intention of asking our own community if we would like to be like them either, because we have already chosen our very own path for the future.

We, the Malays in Singapore, should be proud of our achievements, because we have attained them through hard work.

It is true that what we have achieved so far may not be the best, and that we are still lagging behind the other races.

There are large pockets in our community facing various social problems.

We have achieved so much, and yet there is still a long way to go. But we should not despair.

We can do a lot more on our own if the community stay united and cohesive.

In critical issues, we should speak with one voice.

We need to help and strengthen each other while at the same time reach out to the other communities in multi-racial, multi-religious Singapore. A successful and prosperous Singapore can only mean a successful and prosperous Malay community.

Can we do it? Well, to borrow US President Barack Obama’s campaign slogan, “ Yes, we can”.

Read Full Post »

Sometimes I wonder whether our politicians have any brains! First they say NO to sex education claiming that it will only increase sex related activities. Then, when they realise that the number of “official” unwed mothers and baby dumping activities has gone up, without looking at the root of the problem, our Malacca government decided to take a “knee-jerk” reaction. Why worry, just ask them to get married lah………………….
 
I have said in my earlier post some time ago that sweeping the problem under the carpet is not going to solve anything. Everyone of us knows the severity of these premarital sex issues among our people. It is a global phenomenon. Despite that, our politicians, due to political pressure, decided to ignore the fact. Each one of them wants to be more Islamic than the other. The official figure that is quoted is probably not even 1/5 of the actual numbers. In my wife’s government clinic, situated in a suburban area, there is atlest 1-2 unwed single mothers almost every week or two. Of course don’t forget those who abort and hide the pregnancy!
 
Now, our genius Malacca CM have decided to get them married. Firstly, how is he going to decide who is the father of the unborn child? Interesting question! Then he finds one guy who supposedly the father of the unborn child and ask him to marry her. She is 14 years old and he is 16 years old. Great , now they get married and live happily ever after……………………… story closed??????????????? But Oh NO!!!! he just realised that both of them are still studying and have no income!!! WTH, nevermind, leave the baby with your mother and con’t studying. Since you have legalised child marriage, the husband can continue to make babies (no contraception mah, NO SEX EDUCATION PLS). She will get pregnant again and again and there goes her education. Then when the husband finishes his “so-called” education, he will marry someone else. The first child bride will be abandoned to survive on her own! But of course, our CM is happy as no baby dumping and no unwed mothers, everything is solved from statistical point of view
 
Interesting movie to make, I hope Yasmin Ahmad was still alive to make such movies………………………..
 
 
 
Outcry as Malacca allows child marriages
//
Aug 4, 10 4:05pm
Share 22

Malacca’s decision to allow child marriages caused an outcry today, with rights groups condemning new rules that allow Muslim girls below 16 years to wed. 

ivy josiah interview 051208 3The decision by the Islamic religious council in Malacca has been billed as an attempt to curb premarital sex and baby dumping, after a string of cases of newborns being abandoned.

“Child marriage amounts to paedophilia. We should not condone child marriages,” said Ivy Josiah (left), executive director of leading activist group Women’s Aid Organisation.

Malacca Chief Minister Mohamad Ali Rustam reportedly said that marriages for Muslims below the current minimum age of 16 years for females and 18 for males would be allowed with the permission of parents and religious courts.

ALI RUSTAMAli Rustam (left), who is the chairman of the influential state Islamic council, said the plan would reduce the number of cases of babies born out of wedlock and cut incidents of adultery.

“It is a practical move in preventing cases of unwed teenage mothers and other social problems,” he was was quoted as saying by the New Straits Times newspaper Wednesday.

The report said that in the first six months of the year, 174 Muslim women gave birth outside wedlock in the state. All were below 20 years old.

‘Morally and socially unacceptable’

In Malaysia, Muslims make up about 60 percent of the 28 million population and are subject to religious syariah law which operates in parallel with the civil legal system.

Malacca earlier announced that the state would open a special school for Muslim girls who become pregnant out of wedlock, a move that also came under fire from rights groups.

“This is a knee-jerk reaction, and such policies should not be carved out by state religious authorities but the federal Ministries of Women, Education, and Health,” said Josiah.

Josiah said that Malaysia recognises those aged under 18 years as children, and that allowing them to marry early would deprive them of an education and the right to choose a partner.

“It is really a regressive move. It is turning back the clock. This man (the chief minister) should resign,” she said.

rafidah shahrizat wanita umno mt pwtc 021208 shahrizatShahrizat Abdul Jalil (right), the minister for women, family and community development, said that underage marriage was “morally and socially unacceptable”.

“Placing the heavy burden and responsibility of parenthood on children can deprive them of their rights to a full and harmonious development,” she said.

The number of underage pregnancies in Malaysia rose to 111 in the first four months of this year from 107 in 2008, according to government numbers.

Recent cases of babies being abandoned by their unwed mothers have led the Malaysian government to set up its first baby “hatch”, where mothers can drop off unwanted children anonymously.

Meanwhile, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Jamil Khir Baharom said that permission to marry for under-aged students is not across the board but determined on a case-by-case basis.

“Under Islamic enactments for marriage, the minimum age is 18 for males and 16 for females but there can be exceptions.

“As such, the action by the Melaka Islamic Religious Council to permit under-age marriage is provided for under the law but has to be done on a case-by-case basis,” he told reporters after witnessing the signing of a memorandum of agreement (MOA) between the Malaysian Islamic Development Department (Jakim) and 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).

The MOA allows Jakim to manage 1MDB scholarships for students from religious schools.

Agencies

Read Full Post »

An excellent speech from K u LI
 
We were once ‘Malaysians’
//
Razaleigh Hamzah
Jul 31, 10
2:36pm
Share 55

The following keynote speech was given by Gua Musang parliamentarian and former finance minister Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah at the 4th Annual Malaysian Student Leaders Summit (MSLS) today.

I have played some small role in the life of this nation, but having been on the wrong side of one or two political fights with the powers-that-be, I am not as close to the young people of this country as I would hope to be.

History and the 8 o’clock news are written by the victors. In recent years, the government’s monopoly of the media has been destroyed by the technology revolution.

You could say I was also a member of the United Kingdom and Eire Council for Malaysian Students (UKEC). Well I was, except that I belonged to the predecessor of the UKEC, by more than 50 years, the Malayan Students Union of the UK and Eire. I led this organisation in 1958/59.

asli forum tengku razaleigh economy 150109 02I was then a student of Queen’s University at Belfast, as well as at Lincoln’s Inn. In a rather cooler climate than Kota Bharu’s, we campaigned for decolonisation. We demonstrated in Trafalgar Square and even in Paris. We made posters and participated in British elections.

Your invitation to participate in the MSLS was prefaced by an essay that calls for an intellectually informed activism. I congratulate you on this. The youth of today, you note, “will chart the future of Malaysia.” You say you “no longer want to be ignored and leave the future of our Malaysia at the hands of the current generation.” You “want to grab the bull by the horns… and have a say in where we go as a society and as a nation.”

I feel the same, actually. A lot of Malaysians feel the same. They are tired of being ignored and talked down to.

You are right. The present generation in power has let Malaysia down. But also you cite two things as testimony of the importance of youth and of student activism to this country, the election results of 2008 and “the prime minister’s acknowledgement of the role of youth in the development of the country.”

So perhaps you are a little way yet from thinking for yourselves. The first step in “grabbing the bull by the horns” is not to require the endorsement of the prime minister, or any minister, for your activism. Politicians are not your parents. They are your servants. You don’t need a government slogan coined by a foreign PR agency to wrap your project in. You just go ahead and do it.

At ease with himself

When I was a student, our newly independent country was already a leader in the post-colonial world. We were sought out as a leader in the Afro-Asian Conference that inaugurated the Non-Aligned Movement and the G-77. 

The Afro-Asian movement was led by such luminaries as Zhou En Lai, Nehru, Kwame Nkrumah and Soekarno. Malaysians were seen as moderate leaders capable of mediating between the more radical leaders and the West. We were known for our moderation, good sense and reliability.

We were a leader in the Islamic world, as ourselves and as we were, without our leaders having to put up false displays of piety. His memory has been scrubbed out quite systematically from our national consciousness, so you might not know this or much else about him, but it was Tunku Abdul Rahman who established our leadership in the Islamic world by coming up with the idea of the OIC (Organisation of Islamic Conference) and making it happen.

tunku abdul rahmanUnder his leadership, Malaysia led the way in taking up the anti-apartheid cause in the Commonwealth and in the United Nations, resulting in South Africa’s expulsion from these bodies.

Here was a man at ease with himself, made it a policy goal that Malaysia be “a happy country”. He loved sport and encouraged sporting achievement among Malaysians. He was owner of many a fine race horses. He called a press conference with his stewards when his horse won at the Melbourne Cup.

He had nothing to hide because his great integrity in service was clear to all. Now we have religious and moral hypocrites who cheat, lie and steal in office, who propagate an ideology that shackled the education system for all Malaysians, while they send their own kids to elite academies in the West.

Days when we were on top

Speaking of football – you’re too young to have experienced the Merdeka Cuphe 60s and 70s. Teams from across Asia would come to play in Kuala Lumpur: teams such as South Korea and Japan, whom we defeated routinely.

We were one of the better sides in Asia. We won the bronze medal at the Asian Games in 1974 and qualified for the Moscow Olympics in 1980. Today our FIFA ranking is 157 out of 203 countries.

That puts us in the lowest quartile, below Maldives (149), the smallest country in Asia, with just 400,000 people living about 1.5 metres above sea level who have to worry that their country may soon be swallowed up by climate change. Here in Asean we are behind Indonesia, Thailand, Singapore, whom we used to dominate, and now only one spot above basketball-playing Philippines.

The captain of our illustrious 1970’s side was Soh Chin Aun, R Arumugam, Isa Bakar, Santokh Singh, James Wong and Mokhtar Dahari. They were heroes whose names rolled off the tongues of our schoolchildren as they copied them on the school field. It wasn’t about being the best in the world, but about being passionate and united and devoted to the game.

It was the same in badminton, except at one time we were the best in the world. I remember Wong Peng Soon, the first Asian to win the All-England Championship, and then just dominated it throughout the 1950. Back home every kid who played badminton in every little kampung wanted to call himself Wong Peng Soon.

There was no tinge of anybody identifying themselves exclusively as Chinese, Malays or Indian. Peng Soon was a Malayan hero. Just like each of our football heroes. Now we do not have an iota of that feeling. Where has it all gone?

Capital flight troubling


I don’t think it’s mere nostalgia that makes us think there was a time when the sun shone more brightly upon Malaysia. I bring up sport because it has been a mirror of our more general performance as a nation.

When we were at ease with who we were and didn’t need slogans to do our best together, we did well. When race and money entered our game, we declined. The same applies to our political and economic life.

Soon after independence, we were already a highly successful developing country. We had begun the infrastructure building and diversification of our economy that would be the foundation for further growth. We carried out an import-substitution programme that stimulated local productive capacity.

From there, we started an infrastructure build-up that enabled a diversification of the economy leading to rapid industrialisation. We carried out effective programmes to raise rural income and help the landless with programmes such as Felda.

Our achievements in achieving growth with equity were recognised around the world. Our peer group in economic development were South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan, and we led the pack. I remember we used to send technical consultants to advise the South Koreans.

Bmalaysia stock exchange market klse 141008 05y the late 90s, however, we had fallen far behind this group and were competing with Thailand and Indonesia. Today, according to the latest World Investment Report, FDI into Malaysia is at a 20-year low.

We are entering the peer group of Cambodia, Burma and the Philippines as an investment destination. Thailand, despite a month-long siege of the capital, attracted more FDI than we did last year. Indonesia and Vietnam far outperform us, not as a statistical blip but consistently. Soon we shall have difficulty keeping up with the Philippines.

This, I believe, is called relegation. If we take into account FDI outflow, the picture is even more depressing. Last year, we received US$1.38 billion in investments but US$8.04 billion flowed out. We are the only country in Southeast Asia that has suffered net FDI outflow.

I am not against outward investment. It can be a good thing for the country. But an imbalance on this scale indicates capital flight, not mere investment overseas.

Time to wake up

Without a doubt, Malaysia is slipping. Billions have been looted from this country, and billions more are being siphoned out as our entire political structure crumbles. Yet we are gathered here in comfort, in a country that still seems to ‘work’ – most of the time. This is due less to good management than to the extraordinary wealth of this country.

You were born into a country of immense resources, both natural, cultural and social. We have been wearing down this advantage with mismanagement and corruption. With lies, tall tales and theft. We have a political class unwilling or unable to address the central issue of the day because they have grown fat and comfortable with a system built on lies and theft.

It is time to wake up. That waking up can begin here, right here, at this conference. Not tomorrow or the day after but today. So let me, as I have the honour of opening this conference, suggest the following:

1) Overcome the urge to have our hopes for the future endorsed by the prime minister. He will have retired, and I’ll be long gone, when your future arrives. The shape of your future is being determined now.

2) Resist the temptation to say “in line with” when we do something. Your projects, believe it or not, don’t have to be in line with any government campaign for them to be meaningful. You don’t need to polish anyone’s apple. Just get on with what you plan to do.

3) Do not put a lid on certain issues as ‘sensitive’ just because someone said they are. Or it is against the ‘social contract’. Or it is ‘politicisation’.

You don’t need to have your conversation delimited by the hyper-sensitive among us. Sensitivity is often a club people use to hit each other with. Reasoned discussion of contentious issues builds understanding and trust. Stress test your ideas.

4) It’s not ‘conservative’ or ‘liberal’ to ask for an end to having politics, economic policy, education policy and everything and the kitchen sink determined by race. It’s called growing up.

5) Don’t let the politicians you have invited here talk down to you.

Don’t let them

Don’t let them tell you how bright and ‘exuberant’ you are, that you are the future of the nation, etc. If you close your eyes and flow with their flattery, you have safely joined the caravan, a caravan taking the nation down a sink hole.

If they tell you the future is in your hands, kindly request that they hand that future over first. Ask them how come the youngest member of our cabinet is 45? Our Merdeka cabinet had an average age below 30.

You’re not the first generation to be bright. Mine wasn’t too stupid. But you could be the first generation of students and young graduates in 50 years to push this nation through a major transformation. And it is a transformation we need desperately.

You will be told that much is expected of you, much has been given to you and so forth. This is all true. Actually much has also been stolen from you. Over the last twenty five years, much of the immense wealth generated by our productive people and our vast resources has been looted. This was supposed to have been your patrimony.

The uncomplicated sense of belonging fully, wholeheartedly, unreservedly, to this country, in all its diversity, that has been taken from you. Our sense of ourselves as Malaysians, a free and united people, has been replaced by a tale of racial strife and resentment that continues to haunt us. The thing is, this tale is false.

Reclaim your history

The most precious thing you have been deprived of has been your history. Someone of my generation finds it hard to describe what must seem like a completely different country to you now.

Malaysia was not born in strife but in unity. Our independence was achieved through a demonstration of unity by the people in supporting a multiracial government led by Tunku Abdul Rahman.

That show of unity, demonstrated first through the municipal elections of 1952 and then through the Alliance’s landslide victory in the elections of 1955, showed that the people of Malaya were united in wanting their freedom. We surprised the British, who thought we could not do this.

Today we are no longer as united as we were then. We are also less free. I don’t think this is a coincidence. It takes free people to have the psychological strength to overcome the confines of a racialised worldview. It takes free people to overcome those politicians bent on hanging on to power gained by racialising every feature of our life including our football teams.

Hence while you are at this conference, let me argue, that as an absolute minimum, we should call for the repeal of unjust and much abused Acts of Parliament which are reversals of freedoms that we won at Merdeka.

I ask you in joining me in calling for the repeal of the ISA (Internal Security Act) and the OSA (Official Secrets Act). These draconian laws have been used, more often than not, as political tools rather than instruments of national security. They create a climate of fear.

I ask you to join me in calling for the repeal of the Printing and Publications Act, and above all, the Universities and University Colleges Act (UUCA). I don’t see how you can pursue your student activism with such freedom and support in the UK and Eire while forgetting that your brethren at home are deprived of their basic rights of association and expression by the UUCA. The UUCA has done immense harm in dumbing down our universities.

We must have freedom as guaranteed under our constitution. Freedom to assemble, associate, speak, write, move. This is basic. Even on matters of race and even on religious matters we should be able to speak freely, and we shall educate each other.

Make BN multiracial

It is time to realise the dream of Hussein Onn and the spirit of the Alliance and of Tunku Abdul Rahman. That dream was one of unity and a single Malaysian people. They went as far as they could with it in their time. Instead of taking on the torch, we have reversed course. The next step for us as a country is to move beyond the infancy of race-based parties to a non-racial party system.

Our race-based party system is the key political reason why we are a sick country, declining before our own eyes, with money fleeing and people telling their children not to come home after their studies.

So let us try to take 1Malaysia seriously. Millions have been spent putting up billboards and adding the term to every conceivable thing. We even have ‘Cuti-cuti 1Malaysia’. Can’t take a normal holiday anymore. This is all fine.

Now let us see if it means anything. Let us see the government of the day lead by example. 1Malaysia is empty because it is propagated by a government supported by a racially-based party system that is the chief cause of our inability to grow up in our race relations.

Our inability to grow up in our race relations is the chief reason why investors, and we ourselves, no longer have confidence in our economy. The reasons why we are behind Maldives in football, and behind the Philippines in FDI, are linked.

So let us take 1Malaysia seriously, and convert Barisan Nasional into a party open to all citizens. Let it be a multiracial party open to direct membership. Pakatan Rakyat will be forced to do the same or be left behind the times. Then we shall have the vehicles for a two party, non-race-based system.

If Umno, MIC or MCA are afraid of losing supporters, let them get their members to join this new multiracial party. Pakatan Rakyat should do the same. Nobody need feel left out. Umno members can join en masse. The Hainanese Kopitiam Owners’ Association can join whichever party they want, or both parties en masse if they like.

We can maintain our cherished civil associations, however we choose to associate. But we drop all communalism when we compete for the ballot. When our candidates stand for elections, let them ever after stand only as Malaysians, for better

Read Full Post »

 An excellent view from Ku Li. As I have said before, we are going in the direction of the Philipines. The only thing that is sustaining us is oil and oil palm. Soon Indonesia will overtake us.

Najib can go around begging everyone to invest in Malaysia but our “Little Napoleons” and UMNO warlords are not making these people’s life any easier!! where is my commission mah……………..? I want to sign papers and earn 10% kind of mentality but do not want to do any work! 

Malaysia’s economy being ‘looted’, says Ku Li

By Asrul Hadi Abdullah Sani
July 31, 2010

KUALA LUMPUR, July 31 — Former finance minister Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah today claimed that billions of taxpayer’s money have been “looted” from the country.The outspoken politician also criticised the “political class” and its refusal to address the issue.

“Without a doubt, Malaysia is slipping. Billions have been looted from this country, and billions more are being siphoned out as our entire political structure crumbles.

“Yet we are gathered here in comfort, in a country that still seems to ‘work.’ Most of the time. This is due less to good management than to the extraordinary wealth of this country,” the Gua Musang MP said during the 4th Annual Malaysian Student Leaders Summit here.

The Kelantan prince, popularly known as Ku Li, said that public must not be deceived with the mismanagement and corruption of the economy.

“You were born into a country of immense resources both natural and cultural and social. We have been wearing down this advantage with mismanagement and corruption. With lies, tall tales and theft.

“We have a political class unwilling or unable to address the central issue of the day because they have grown fat and comfortable with a system built on lies and theft,” he said.

Ku Li stressed that the recent World Foreign Investment Report (WIR) which showed a drop in the country’s foreign direct investment (FDI) was not a statistical blip.

“Today, according to the latest World Investment Report, FDI into Malaysia is at about a twenty year low. We are entering the peer group of Cambodia, Myanmar and the Philippines as an investment destination. Thailand, despite a month-long siege of the capital, attracted more FDI than we did last year. Indonesia and Vietnam far out perform us, not as a statistical blip but consistently. Soon we shall have difficulty keeping up with the Philippines,” he said.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has come under fire from opposition parties for Malaysia’s lacklustre FDI rates, which have fallen faster than regional counterparts such as Singapore and China even while capital outflows dampened private domestic investment.

The WIR 2010 released by the United Nations showed that FDI in Malaysia plunged 81 per cent last year, trailing behind countries like the Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia and Singapore.

The report revealed that Malaysia suffered a large 81.1 per cent drop in FDIs compared to far healthier figures in Thailand (30.4 per cent), Vietnam (44.1 per cent) and Indonesia (44.7 per cent).

In May, Minister of International Trade and Industry Datuk Seri Mustapa Mohamed announced that investments in the country for Q1 2010 amounted to RM5.2 billion.

FDIs made up RM3.2 billion of this total, with Singapore, Taiwan and Japan being the biggest contributors.

Mustapa said the investment amount was still relatively low against the total amount of RM32.6 billion in investments received last year.

Najib has been trying to lift Malaysia’s profile as a destination for foreign investment to help the country achieve an average GDP growth of at least 6 per cent per annum over the next five years.

However, his administration has insisted that the GDP growth target is still achievable despite warning that the economy may slow down in the second half of the year due to external factors.

“This, I believe, is called relegation. If we take into account FDI outflow, the picture is even more interesting. Last year we received US$1.38 billion (RM4.07 billion) in investments but US$ 8.04 billion flowed out. We are the only country in Southeast Asia which has suffered nett FDI outflow.

“I am not against outward investment. It can be a good thing for the country. But an imbalance on this scale indicates capital flight, not mere investment overseas,” said Tengku Razaleigh.

 

 

 

Read Full Post »

  Brain drain is a huge problem in Malaysia. The government led by UMNO knows very clearly about this but of course, they are not bothered since the outflow is mainly non-Bumis. ” You tak Suka, you keluarlah!”, remember this famous word from a parliamentarian? UMNO’s hidden agenda since the early 1970s is to shrink the non-Malay population and to increase the Malay population. Thus they created all the frustration for the non-Malays which in turn will make the non-Malays to leave the country. I have written about this before in my post titled “Where have all the chinese gone?”  

Unfortunately what they did not realise is the fact that most of the people who left the country are the best brains that the country could have used to become a developed nation. Most of the people who received the citizenship from UMNO were Indonesian immigrants who are unskilled labourers which did not bring any good for this nation except increasing the number of “Malays” in the country. Indonesians who receive citizenship becomes instant Bumiputeras where as a non-Malays who sloughed for this country for centuries become “second” class citizens till today.  

The article below is well written about the seriousness of the Brain Drain problem for this country. As far as I am concerned, as long as Malaysia practises racial policies, it is bound to be doomed. God is watching!  

Foreign spouses and the brain drain

Sideways by Deborah Loh | 23 July 2010    

 (Pic by lusi / sxc.hu)   

WORSE than Malaysia’s brain drain problem is the fact that little is coming in to replace what goes out. Losing skilled local talent to other countries is not unique to Malaysia, as statistics show. After all, the world was built on migration.But what is unique, and not in a good way, is that we can’t seem to attract enough foreign skilled labour to equalise the outflow. “We’re a failed brain transplant,” said Dr Toh Kin Woon, a former Gerakan and Penang state exco member, at a 13 July 2010 public forum in Kuala Lumpur on Malaysia’s brain drain.Part of this lack of inflow can be attributed to immigration rules that make it difficult and arbitrary for foreign spouses of Malaysians, and the children of such unions, to obtain permanent residency (PR), citizenship and employment. And yet, adjusting these rules would be the most sensible and practical immediate solution to the brain drain problem. So why aren’t we doing it?Malaysians abroadMalaysians have long been going abroad ever since independence for tertiary education in Commonwealth countries. Between 1960 and 2005, a hundred-fold increase was recorded in emigration numbers. There were 9,576 Malaysians residing abroad in 1960. In 2005, the number rose to 1,489,168, according to World Bank statistics, said former Human Resources Minister Tan Sri Dr Fong Chan Onn, who was also a presenter at the public forum.The figure in 2005, however, shows how alarming the outflow of human capital for Malaysia is when compared with the 919,302 world average migration per nation. Malaysia is losing people at a higher rate than other nations.A high percentage of this outflow is skilled labour. Fong said there were 102,321 Malaysian graduates residing in Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries in 2000. This represented 77.24% of total Malaysian migrants in these countries. They also represent a 40.84% increase from the number of tertiary-educated migrants since 1990. 

Fong Fong at the forum

We could comfort ourselves that Malaysia is not alone in losing skilled talent to other countries. Fong said data from OECD countries in 2000 showed that Singapore had 67,560 migrants in these countries, of whom 74.04% were graduates. Of Thailand’s 222,550 migrants, 41.7% were tertiary-educated. South Korea lost 885,885 people, of whom 73.7% were graduates; and India had 1.5 million of its citizens abroad, of whom 69% had degrees.And Malaysia isn’t the only one losing doctors, nurses and other medical personnel to other countries. There were 4,129 Malaysian doctors and 7,431 nurses in OECD countries in 2000. Other Asian neighbours with higher figures in the same year were Taiwan (5,332 doctors) and the Philippines (15,859 doctors and 110,557 nurses).The reasons why Malaysians leave are varied, and have been discussed repeatedly in various other forums. But it is of little comfort when we realise that while our neighbours are able to draw an inflow of skilled talent through immigration-friendly policies, attractive rewards and open environments, Malaysia is only able to draw low-skilled foreign labour. There are an estimated 2.5 million foreign workers in the country, both legal and illegal, all largely holding menial jobs in agriculture, manufacturing, construction and low-paying service sectors. In contrast, the New Economic Model report has noted that the number of expatriates from first-world countries, which was 90,000 in 2000, was halved by 2008.If government reverse-brain drain programmes have only had minimal success, then it is time that due consideration be given to other approaches. For a start, as suggested by Fong at the forum, by relaxing immigration and employment rules for foreign spouses and children.   

Malaysians and their foreign spouses are flocking to other shores (Pic by Patrick Doheny @ Flickr) Why are Malaysians and their foreign spouses flocking to other shores? (Pic by Patrick Doheny @ Flickr) Runaround  

 What turns highly-trained Malaysians and their highly-skilled foreign spouses away? For one, the foreign spouse, whether the husband or wife, is not entitled to immediate Malaysian citizenship or PR status despite adopting Malaysia as their new home. Instead, they have to go through a repeated and tiresome application process, which involves the runaround with immigration authorities, endless waiting, and unexplained rejections. Their existence in the country, meanwhile, is validated by a renewable social visit pass that restricts their employment. Children of a Malaysian woman married to a foreign husband also do not qualify for PR status or citizenship, until recently when the government announced a “new mechanism” to let such mothers obtain Malaysian citizenship for their children abroad. How well this is working out is unclear given that it was just announced. There is also the inconvenience of having to travel back to Malaysia to appear in person at the National Registration Department headquarters with the baby. Foreign spouses have documented their difficulty and emotional trauma of being left in limbo over their PR applications, much less citizenship. These stories are many, and some end with Malaysians making the painful decision to uproot to settle in their foreign spouse’s country. Cold War mentality    

At the public forum, even Fong himself, a former cabinet minister, seemed bewildered as to why Malaysian immigration policies remain the way it is in this day and age. He described such policies as “Cold War mentality”. To be less polite, the policies are actually xenophobic. For lack of any rational explanation from the government, people are left to conclude that at worst, the snail’s pace of processing applications is part of moves to ensure a certain racial balance in the country. At best, it is just plain inefficiency if foreign spouses have had to wait for up to two decades or more.   

Vijay Singh (Pic by Siyi Chen / Wiki commons) Vijay Singh (Pic by Siyi Chen / Wiki commons) If Malaysia weren’t so xenophobic, imagine the talent we could have possibly laid claim to. Could former world number-one golfer Vijay Singh, a Fijian married to a Malaysian, be playing as a Malaysian instead? What other talents among the nearly 1.5 million Malaysians who have migrated, and their spouses, have we let slip through our fingers?  

 In his last interview on the subject in September 2009, Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein offered little new insight into reasons for the lengthy and arbitrary process of approving PR and citizenship applications. But he did understandably say that vetting thousands of such applications to ensure they were bona fide cases and not “marriages of convenience” was a time-consuming and difficult process. Fair enough. But when it comes to highly-qualified and skilled human capital, it doesn’t make sense that the government would still be as finicky and slow. If a foreign spouse has all the right academic and professional qualifications to contribute to Malaysia, why can’t PR or citizenship approvals be sped up for them? Isn’t it obvious to the policymakers that spouses with such experience and potential can be part of the solution to Malaysia’s brain drain? The government was certainly clear on Indonesian badminton champion Rexy Mainaki‘s contribution to Malaysia, when he coached the national doubles team, that it gave him and his family Malaysian PR status. Why can’t there be ways, then, to filter foreigners who are in marriages of convenience from those who can contribute to the skilled labour pool in Malaysia? For one, it is obvious that foreign spouses who are highly qualified and who have an established professional track record would not need to be so economically needy as to require the “convenience” of a Malaysian spouse to live here. Throughout history, immigrants who have made good in places where they were given the opportunity to do so not only became giants in their fields of expertise, but added to the lustre of the countries and institutions they joined. Albert Einstein, a German Jew, migrated to the US to escape Nazism and joined Princeton University. He died a US citizen. Julia Gillard was born Welsh and migrated to Australia as a child, where she is currently the prime minister. So really, the government should realise that simply clearing the backlog of citizenship and PR applications isn’t cause for applause. It simply was a job they failed to do earlier. And having done so isn’t enough. What’s needed is a reformed and unbiased way of approaching the issue of foreign spouses. Especially if the national issue at stake is to stem the bleeding of human capital.  Deborah Loh wonders when the government will appreciate the diversity of Malaysians, their spouses, and what they can contribute to the country.

   

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »